Broń Radom vs Swit: match statistics
Broń Radom vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Broń Radom play Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Broń Radom: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Swit: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Broń Radom scores 1.18 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Broń Radom 53%, Swit 59%. Over 2.5: Broń Radom 47%, Swit 65%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Broń Radom has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.29. Broń Radom: 9.1 shots per match, Swit: 6.9.
Match halves
Broń Radom: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.53. Swit: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Broń Radom: 46-60 (10 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Broń Radom has a clear superiority in chance creation: the hosts average 1.72 xG at home versus Świt’s 1.16 xG away, and Broń averages 15.09 shots per match (5.45 on target) compared to 9 shots (3.38 on target) for the visitors. Defensively the hosts are better as well — Broń concedes 1.31 goals per home match, while Świt concedes 2.69 goals on the road and has a negative away goal difference of -20. In the last 5 matches both teams are in a slump, but Broń posts slightly better figures: the hosts average 0.6 points per match (1 win, 4 losses) and have conceded 8 while scoring 6, whereas Świt averages 0.4 pts per match (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses) and in that period conceded 13 and scored 6. Although Świt has a higher finishing efficiency (conversion 13% vs Broń’s 9%), their lower shot volume (9 vs 15.09) and greater defensive vulnerability away (2.69 goals conceded) favor the hosts; Broń failed to score in only 15% of home matches, while Świt were goalless in 23% of away games. Considering the xG advantage (1.72 vs 1.16), higher shot volume (15.09 vs 9) and superior defensive metrics at home, I predict a Broń Radom victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Broń Radom | Swit | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Swit is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Broń Radom · 1.2 pts / match - Swit
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Swit is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Broń Radom · 1.5 goals / match - Swit
Broń Radom is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.68 goals / match - Broń Radom · 1.94 goals / match - Swit
Broń Radom scores in 62% of matches (21 of 34 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
Swit scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Broń Radom keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Broń Radom
Over / Under — Swit
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Broń Radom - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Swit - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Broń Radom
Swit
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Broń Radom | Liga | Swit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.85 | 3.33 | ▲ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 66% | • 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 20% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 83% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Broń Radom 1 - 0 - 0 Swit. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Broń Radom vs Swit?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Broń Radom 0:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Broń Radom vs Swit?
Broń Radom score 1.18 goals per game on average and Swit 1.50. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Broń Radom's matches and 59% of Swit's.
What form are Broń Radom and Swit in?
Over the last 5 games Broń Radom have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Swit 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Broń Radom vs Swit?
The statistical background for Broń Radom vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.