United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: match statistics

Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Brooklyn FC play Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Brooklyn FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.94 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Brooklyn FC 47%, Charleston Battery 50%. Over 2.5: Brooklyn FC 60%, Charleston Battery 56%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Charleston Battery has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.43. Brooklyn FC: 11.1 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 13.1.

Match halves

Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (5 goals). Charleston Battery: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Charleston holds a clear advantage in standings and form: the visitors sit 7th versus Brooklyn 20th, with Charleston’s away record 3-0-1 compared to the hosts’ 1-0-4 at home. The difference over the last 5 matches is significant — Charleston averages 1.8 points per game and has scored 9 goals, while Brooklyn averages only 0.6 points and 2 goals in that period. Brooklyn dominates possession (60%) and creates many chances (avg. 15 shots and 6 on target at home, xG 1.74) but suffers from low efficiency — only 0.67 goals per game and a conversion rate of ~4%. Charleston is far more clinical with fewer attempts (3.5 shots and 2.5 on target away), has xG 0.66 but converts at a rate yielding 1.0 goal per game with ~29% conversion, and defensively concedes just 0.5 goals away with 50% clean sheets. Considering the higher points average (1.8 vs 0.6), superior finishing (29% vs 4%) and the visitors’ defensive stability, I predict a Charleston win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

29Possession (%)71
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
10Shots13
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
7Shots on target4
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.59xG1.87
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
8Corners10
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
65Dangerous attacks104
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
11Fouls13
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
4Cards1
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.13Goals scored / match1.94
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.73Goals conceded / match1.38
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
50%Average possession56%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
4.73Shots on target / match5.44
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.13Shots per match13.06
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
4.73Shots on target5.44
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
10.2%Shot conversion14.8%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
50%Possession56%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.43xG for1.61
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.64xG against1.27
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Shooting quality

Brooklyn FC: BalancedCharleston Battery: Efficient finishing
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Charleston Battery is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 2 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Brooklyn FC
DDLWD
Season result split
20% W27% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-8
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Charleston Battery
WWWLD
Season result split
50% W19% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-5
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Charleston Battery is 72% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.94 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Charleston Battery is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.38 goals / match - Charleston Battery

Brooklyn FC scoring profile: very strong

Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Charleston Battery scoring profile: very strong

Charleston Battery scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

17Goals scored (season)31
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
26Goals conceded (season)22
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
2.87Average goals in match3.31
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
8Goals scored (last 5)15
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal69%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
40%2 goals56%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
7%3 goals31%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
0%4 goals25%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal81%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
60%2 goals38%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
27%3 goals13%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
7%4 goals6%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Charleston Battery - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 16 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time13%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
13%BTTS in both halves6%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
20%Scored in both halves38%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
60%BTTS - last 580%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Charleston Battery is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.69 pts / match - Charleston Battery

Brooklyn FC - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing
Charleston Battery - half-time state
44% leading38% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.69
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.94
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.38
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
40%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
60%No goal before half-time56%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.94
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
47%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery
53%No goal after half-time38%
Brooklyn FCCharleston Battery

Brooklyn FC - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Charleston Battery - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Brooklyn FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Charleston Battery - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Brooklyn FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Charleston Battery
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Brooklyn FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Charleston Battery

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Brooklyn FCLigaCharleston Battery
Average goals in match 2.872.79 3.31
Both teams scored 47%58% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%52% 56%
Clean sheets 20%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 80%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?

The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 3:0 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?

Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.94. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 50% of Charleston Battery's.

What form are Brooklyn FC and Charleston Battery in?

Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.