Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: match statistics
Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Brooklyn FC played Charleston Battery in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Brooklyn FC: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Charleston Battery: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.
Goal statistics
Brooklyn FC scores 0.40 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Charleston Battery scores 1.75 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Brooklyn FC 20%, Charleston Battery 50%. Over 2.5: Brooklyn FC 60%, Charleston Battery 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Brooklyn FC has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.36. Brooklyn FC: 12.4 shots per match, Charleston Battery: 11.3.
Match halves
Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20. Charleston Battery: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Brooklyn FC: 16-30 (1 goals). Charleston Battery: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Charleston holds a clear advantage in standings and form: the visitors sit 7th versus Brooklyn 20th, with Charleston’s away record 3-0-1 compared to the hosts’ 1-0-4 at home. The difference over the last 5 matches is significant — Charleston averages 1.8 points per game and has scored 9 goals, while Brooklyn averages only 0.6 points and 2 goals in that period. Brooklyn dominates possession (60%) and creates many chances (avg. 15 shots and 6 on target at home, xG 1.74) but suffers from low efficiency — only 0.67 goals per game and a conversion rate of ~4%. Charleston is far more clinical with fewer attempts (3.5 shots and 2.5 on target away), has xG 0.66 but converts at a rate yielding 1.0 goal per game with ~29% conversion, and defensively concedes just 0.5 goals away with 50% clean sheets. Considering the higher points average (1.8 vs 0.6), superior finishing (29% vs 4%) and the visitors’ defensive stability, I predict a Charleston win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal stats for Brooklyn strongly support BTTS: an average of 2.5 goals scored and xG 2.76 per home match, while at home they still have no clean sheets (0% clean sheets) and their home games have ended Goal/Goal in 100% of cases. Charleston presents mixed signals: season away xG is only 0.66 and season away BTTS is 0%, but in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.8 goals, had last5 xG 1.74 and BTTS in 60% of those games. Short-term Brooklyn is weaker in attack — in the last 5 they averaged 0.4 goals scored and conceded 1.8 (total 2 scored and 9 conceded), yet seasonally they create many chances (8.5 shots on target and 18.5 shots overall per match) which suggests goal-scoring potential exists. Charleston concedes little on the season (avg 0.5 goals per away match), but their last 5 matches show higher defensive vulnerability and xG against around 1.14–1.4, making both teams realistically likely to score. Considering Brooklyn’s dominant home BTTS history (100%) and Charleston’s form with 1.8 goals and 60% BTTS in the last 5, I assign 70% to BTTS - Yes and 30% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 2.11 goals for Brooklyn and 0.95 for Charleston (total 3.06), calculated as the average of the home attack (xG 2.76) and away defence (xGA 1.45) and vice versa (xG 0.66 and xGA 1.23). Brooklyn strongly dominates in chance creation — averaging 18.5 shots and 8.5 on target versus Charleston’s 3.5 and 2.5 — which, given xG 2.76 and a 14% conversion rate, gives a realistic chance of at least 2 goals for the home side. Charleston has a low attacking xG of 0.66 and averages 1.0 goal per game, and although they statistically concede 0.5 goals on the road and keep 50% clean sheets, their xGA of 1.45 suggests a risk of conceding. A Poisson model with aggregate λ=3.06 yields probabilities of over 1.5 = 81%, over 2.5 = 59% and over 3.5 = 37%, and additionally Brooklyn have 100% of home matches over 2.5 goals this season, which strengthens the argument for the over. The strongest and most unambiguous signal is over 1.5, therefore I recommend backing the over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Brooklyn has a clear advantage in chance creation: xG 2.76 vs 0.66, averaging 18.5 shots per game vs 3.5 and 8.5 shots on target vs 2.5, indicating home dominance over 90 minutes. However, the half-time data show a weaker start from the hosts — Brooklyn averages 0.5 goals scored and concedes 1.0 by the break, while Charleston averages 0.5 scored and 0.0 conceded (seasonal clean sheet rate at half-time for the away side 100%). In the last 5 matches Brooklyn scores only 0.4 goals per game (form: lllll), whereas Charleston has 1.8 goals in the last 5 with form wwllw, so a draw or an away lead at the break is realistic. Considering the xG advantage and the hosts’ 8.5 shots on target, the most justified scenario is a draw at half-time and a Brooklyn win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Brooklyn FC | Charleston Battery | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.09 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Charleston Battery is 275% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 2.25 pts / match - Charleston Battery
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Charleston Battery is 338% better for: goals scored per match.
0.4 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.75 goals / match - Charleston Battery
Charleston Battery is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.8 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1 goals / match - Charleston Battery
Brooklyn FC scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Charleston Battery keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Charleston Battery scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
Over / Under - Charleston Battery
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Charleston Battery is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.75 pts / match - Charleston Battery
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Charleston Battery - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Brooklyn FC
Charleston Battery
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Brooklyn FC | Liga | Charleston Battery | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.20 | 2.55 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 62% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?
The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 3:0 Charleston Battery. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?
Brooklyn FC score 0.40 goals per game on average and Charleston Battery 1.75. The USL Championship average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 50% of Charleston Battery's.
What form are Brooklyn FC and Charleston Battery in?
Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Charleston Battery 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Brooklyn FC vs Charleston Battery: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.