Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics
Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Brooklyn FC played Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Brooklyn FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Brooklyn FC 47%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. Over 2.5: Brooklyn FC 60%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Brooklyn FC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.24. Brooklyn FC: 11.1 shots per match, Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7.
Match halves
Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87.
Goals by minute
Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (5 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pittsburgh Riverhounds sit in 10th place, while Brooklyn FC are only 24th, and across the season the visitors have won 9 matches compared with just 3 wins for the hosts. Brooklyn have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 4 goals and conceding 11, whereas Pittsburgh have recorded 2 wins over the same period, with their defense allowing only 3 goals. At home, the hosts average 0.75 goals and fail to score in 50% of their matches, which could be an issue against a visiting side that keeps a clean sheet in 33% of away games. Pittsburgh average 1.00 goals away from home but have a significantly better shot conversion rate, 13% compared with Brooklyn’s 6%. However, the visitors’ advantage is not overwhelming, as their away xG stands at just 1.05, while Brooklyn create chances worth 1.52 xG at home, making a draw a realistic alternative.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal share of matches in which both teams scored is just 36% for Brooklyn FC and 44% for Pittsburgh Riverhounds, clearly below the league average of 53%. Pittsburgh have conceded only 0.6 goals per game over their last five matches, kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches this season, while Brooklyn have scored just 4 goals during this period, averaging 0.8 per game. The visitors have also averaged 0.8 goals per game recently, while Brooklyn have recorded clean sheets in 27% of their matches, limiting confidence in Pittsburgh to score. The hosts have created slightly more, with an xG of 1.41 over their last five matches compared with their opponents’ 1.05, but their poor finishing and the visitors’ solid defence support a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is not more likely than BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The season profiles of both teams point to a moderate number of goals: Brooklyn average 1.27 goals, while Pittsburgh average 1.00. The 3.5 line was not exceeded in 73% of Brooklyn’s matches and as many as 89% of Pittsburgh’s games, while only 27% and 11% of their matches respectively ended with at least four goals. The average xG figures support a result in the region of 2 goals, standing at 1.30 for the home side and 1.05 for the visitors, with 1.33 and 1.20 xG conceded by their opponents. Pittsburgh have also conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, limiting the outlook for a high-scoring home performance despite Brooklyn’s 11 goals conceded during this period. The strongest pick is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data and attacking potential of both sides clearly favor a scenario with a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Brooklyn were level at the break in 64% of their matches and conceded just 0.18 goals per game in the first half. Pittsburgh have better recent form, averaging 1.4 points per game over their last five fixtures compared with Brooklyn’s 0.4, but their attack has scored only 0.8 goals per match during that period. The visitors are also highly stable defensively, conceding an average of 0.6 goals in their last five matches and just 0.2 after the break, which limits the hosts’ chances of a turnaround. Brooklyn have a slightly higher season xG, 1.30 compared with 1.05, but have scored only 0.8 goals across their last five outings and have not recorded a single win. The low conversion rate of both sides, combined with Pittsburgh’s cautious defensive profile, therefore points towards an evenly matched result at full-time as well.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Brooklyn FC | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
Over / Under - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Brooklyn FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Brooklyn FC | Liga | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.87 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 58% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 26% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Brooklyn FC 1 - 0 - 0 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 0:1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's.
What form are Brooklyn FC and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in?
Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?
The statistical background for Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


