United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 07 September 2026

Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics

Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Brooklyn FC played Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Brooklyn FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Brooklyn FC 47%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. Over 2.5: Brooklyn FC 60%, Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Brooklyn FC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.24. Brooklyn FC: 11.1 shots per match, Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7.

Match halves

Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (5 goals). Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pittsburgh Riverhounds sit in 10th place, while Brooklyn FC are only 24th, and across the season the visitors have won 9 matches compared with just 3 wins for the hosts. Brooklyn have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 4 goals and conceding 11, whereas Pittsburgh have recorded 2 wins over the same period, with their defense allowing only 3 goals. At home, the hosts average 0.75 goals and fail to score in 50% of their matches, which could be an issue against a visiting side that keeps a clean sheet in 33% of away games. Pittsburgh average 1.00 goals away from home but have a significantly better shot conversion rate, 13% compared with Brooklyn’s 6%. However, the visitors’ advantage is not overwhelming, as their away xG stands at just 1.05, while Brooklyn create chances worth 1.52 xG at home, making a draw a realistic alternative.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal share of matches in which both teams scored is just 36% for Brooklyn FC and 44% for Pittsburgh Riverhounds, clearly below the league average of 53%. Pittsburgh have conceded only 0.6 goals per game over their last five matches, kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches this season, while Brooklyn have scored just 4 goals during this period, averaging 0.8 per game. The visitors have also averaged 0.8 goals per game recently, while Brooklyn have recorded clean sheets in 27% of their matches, limiting confidence in Pittsburgh to score. The hosts have created slightly more, with an xG of 1.41 over their last five matches compared with their opponents’ 1.05, but their poor finishing and the visitors’ solid defence support a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is not more likely than BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profiles of both teams point to a moderate number of goals: Brooklyn average 1.27 goals, while Pittsburgh average 1.00. The 3.5 line was not exceeded in 73% of Brooklyn’s matches and as many as 89% of Pittsburgh’s games, while only 27% and 11% of their matches respectively ended with at least four goals. The average xG figures support a result in the region of 2 goals, standing at 1.30 for the home side and 1.05 for the visitors, with 1.33 and 1.20 xG conceded by their opponents. Pittsburgh have also conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, limiting the outlook for a high-scoring home performance despite Brooklyn’s 11 goals conceded during this period. The strongest pick is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data and attacking potential of both sides clearly favor a scenario with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Brooklyn were level at the break in 64% of their matches and conceded just 0.18 goals per game in the first half. Pittsburgh have better recent form, averaging 1.4 points per game over their last five fixtures compared with Brooklyn’s 0.4, but their attack has scored only 0.8 goals per match during that period. The visitors are also highly stable defensively, conceding an average of 0.6 goals in their last five matches and just 0.2 after the break, which limits the hosts’ chances of a turnaround. Brooklyn have a slightly higher season xG, 1.30 compared with 1.05, but have scored only 0.8 goals across their last five outings and have not recorded a single win. The low conversion rate of both sides, combined with Pittsburgh’s cautious defensive profile, therefore points towards an evenly matched result at full-time as well.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Shots-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Shots on target-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0xG0
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Corners-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0Dangerous attacks0
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Fouls-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Cards-1
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.13Goals scored / match1.27
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.73Goals conceded / match1.2
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
50%Average possession49%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
4.73Shots on target / match3.47
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.13Shots per match9.67
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
4.73Shots on target3.47
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
10.2%Shot conversion13.1%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
50%Possession49%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.43xG for1.24
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.64xG against1.29
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Shooting quality

Brooklyn FC: BalancedPittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishing
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Brooklyn FC
DDLWD
Season result split
20% W27% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-8
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 44% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Brooklyn FC scoring profile: strong

Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: very strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

17Goals scored (season)19
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
26Goals conceded (season)18
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
2.87Average goals in match2.47
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%2 goals40%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
7%3 goals20%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0%4 goals0%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal73%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
60%2 goals40%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
27%3 goals7%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
7%4 goals0%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time7%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%BTTS in both halves7%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
20%Scored in both halves27%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
60%BTTS - last 540%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Brooklyn FC - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.27
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.73
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
60%No goal before half-time67%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.47
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
47%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds
53%No goal after half-time40%
Brooklyn FCPittsburgh Riverhounds

Brooklyn FC - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Brooklyn FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Brooklyn FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Brooklyn FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Brooklyn FCLigaPittsburgh Riverhounds
Average goals in match 2.872.79 2.47
Both teams scored 47%58% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%52% 47%
Clean sheets 20%26% 27%
Goal before half-time 80%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardOwen Thomas Mikoy
  2. Brooklyn FCSubstitutionOn: Pierre Da SilvaOff: Stefan Stojanovic
  3. Brooklyn FCSubstitutionOn: Jaden Enrique ServaniaOff: Thomas McNamara
  4. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardJackson Walti
  5. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsGoalSamuel Bassett
  6. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Guillaume VacterOff: Samuel Bassett

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Brooklyn FC 1 - 0 - 0 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 0:1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's.

What form are Brooklyn FC and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in?

Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

The statistical background for Brooklyn FC vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.