Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: match statistics
Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Brooklyn FC played San Antonio in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Brooklyn FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. San Antonio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. San Antonio scores 1.31 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Brooklyn FC 47%, San Antonio 50%. Over 2.5: Brooklyn FC 60%, San Antonio 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Brooklyn FC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. Brooklyn FC: 11.1 shots per match, San Antonio: 11.7.
Match halves
Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60. San Antonio: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (5 goals). San Antonio: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Antonio appears to be the favorite: they sit 5th in the table versus Brooklyn’s 23rd and have 6 wins this season compared to the hosts’ 3. The visitors average 1.25 goals on the road and have a 12% shot conversion, while Brooklyn score only 0.86 at home with a 7% conversion, despite the hosts producing higher xG (1.54 at home vs 1.12 xG for the visitors). Brooklyn attempt more shots (12.0 average and 4.86 on target) than San Antonio (10.13 and 3.0 on target), but lower conversion and 43% of matches without a goal limit their efficiency. Brooklyn’s defense concedes 1.0 goal at home on average versus 1.5 conceded by San Antonio away, however the hosts lose 57% of home matches compared to only 25% defeats for the visitors on the road. Considering better shot conversion, higher away goals average and superior average points in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 1.2), San Antonio have the greater probability of victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS - Yes with an approximate probability of 55% vs 45% because xG indicates the home side expect around 1.49 goals (Brooklyn xG for 1.53 vs San Antonio xG allowed 1.45), and the visitors about 1.23 goals (San Antonio xG for 1.12 vs Brooklyn xG allowed 1.33). With those expectations the probability Brooklyn scores at least once is roughly 77% and San Antonio about 71%, which roughly yields ~55% chance for BTTS. Supporting the 'Yes' case are shot metrics: Brooklyn averages 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target versus 10.13 and 3.0 for San Antonio, so despite the visitors' higher conversion (12% vs 10%) San Antonio still generate enough xG to score. Offsetting signals include that San Antonio fail to score in 50% of matches and Brooklyn keep a clean sheet in 50% of home games, which reduces BTTS certainty. Overall, given the xG edge on both sides and a league BTTS rate of 57%, I give a moderate edge to the 'Yes' scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate the total goals in this match at approximately 2.72 (expected goals: Brooklyn 1.49 and San Antonio 1.23), calculated as Brooklyn’s attack xG 1.53 vs San Antonio’s conceded xG 1.45, and conversely San Antonio’s attack xG 1.12 vs Brooklyn’s conceded xG 1.33. Seasonal indicators support goal propensity: Brooklyn have 63% of matches over 1.5 goals, San Antonio 75%, and the league average goals per match is 2.79. Brooklyn average 13.38 shots and 4.63 on target with a conversion rate of 10%; San Antonio 10.13 shots and 3.0 on target with a 12% conversion — figures consistent with the projected xG. Given the combined expectation of 2.72 goals and strong seasonal rates of 63–75% for >1.5, I recommend Over 1.5 (model probability ≈75%); the 2.5 line is only marginally favored (~51%) and Over 3.5 carries low probability (~29%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Brooklyn FC holds a clear lead at the break: the home side led at halftime in 50% of their home matches and average 0.75 goals by the break while conceding only 0.13. Over full matches Brooklyn records an xG of 1.53 versus San Antonio’s 1.12 and scores an average of 1.38 home goals per game while conceding 0.88, with the home side averaging 4.63 shots on target against the visitors’ 3.0, confirming an offensive and creative edge. San Antonio as the away team posts weaker figures: 25% away wins, an average of 1.25 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match, and led at halftime in only 25% of games, so a scenario where the visitors lead after 45 minutes is unlikely. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet at halftime in 88% of home matches and collect an average of 1.88 points per game this season versus San Antonio’s 1.25, which favors maintaining the halftime lead and converting it into a win. On this basis the most probable and strongest signal is the home side leading at halftime and winning the match (1/1), with lower chances of a draw after the break or a turnaround by San Antonio.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Brooklyn FC | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Brooklyn FC is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1 pts / match - San Antonio
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Antonio is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.31 goals / match - San Antonio
San Antonio is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.19 goals / match - San Antonio
Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
San Antonio scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Brooklyn FC
Over / Under - San Antonio
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Brooklyn FC · 1.63 pts / match - San Antonio
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Brooklyn FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Brooklyn FC
San Antonio
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Brooklyn FC | Liga | San Antonio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.87 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 26% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 67% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 80% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
The USL Championship match finished Brooklyn FC 0:1 San Antonio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
Brooklyn FC score 1.13 goals per game on average and San Antonio 1.31. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Brooklyn FC's matches and 50% of San Antonio's.
What form are Brooklyn FC and San Antonio in?
Over the last 5 games Brooklyn FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and San Antonio 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio?
The statistical background for Brooklyn FC vs San Antonio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.