BUL vs Kitara: match statistics
BUL vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
BUL played Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 19 May 2026. Venue: Kakindu Municipal Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
BUL: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kitara: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
BUL scores 1.04 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.37 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: BUL 43%, Kitara 33%. Over 2.5: BUL 32%, Kitara 30%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.63. BUL: 11.1 shots per match, Kitara: 11.4.
Match halves
BUL: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Kitara: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
BUL: 31-45+ (12 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uganda Premier League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The analysis indicates an advantage for Kitara: the team sits 3rd in the table versus BUL in 8th and has 16 wins this season compared to the hosts' 9. Defensively Kitara is more stable — they concede on average 0.86 goals away versus 1.14 conceded by BUL at home, and over the season the hosts have conceded 28 goals versus 18 for the visitors. BUL, however, creates more chances at home: on average 14.54 shots and 4.92 on target per match with xG 1.86, while Kitara away records 11.15 shots, 4.31 on target and xG 1.61; the hosts' issue is efficiency — only 8% conversion and 43% of matches without scoring versus 36% for the visitors. The last 5 matches for both teams yield an identical record (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses, 1 point per match each), so form does not favor the hosts. Due to a better win record (16 vs 9), a lower goals-against rate and 50% away win rate, I forecast an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS as more likely 'No' due to the home side's defensive strengths: BUL has a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.46 and as many as 62% of matches ending in a clean sheet. Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates below the league average — BUL 31% and Kitara 36% versus league 38% — indicating a lower-than-average frequency of both teams scoring. Arguments for 'Yes' exist: Kitara has xG_for 1.61 and scored 5 goals in the last 5 matches (1.0 average) with BTTS in 40% of their last 5, while BUL scores 1.77 goals seasonally with xG 1.69 and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20%, with 12.54 shots and 5.31 on target per home game. Consequently, despite some risk from the visitors' form (Kitara) and a short-term increase in BUL’s goals conceded to 1.2 per game over the last 5, the dominant seasonal figures (0.46 and 62%) and lower seasonal BTTS rates (31%/36%) favor 'No' (70%) over 'Yes' (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG indicators for both teams are high: xG for BUL is 1.69 and for Kitara 1.61 (total 3.30). After accounting for defensive factors I project 1.56 goals for BUL and 1.44 for Kitara, i.e. roughly 3.00 goals in total. BUL averages 12.54 shots per match with 5.31 on target and a 14% conversion rate; Kitara averages 11.15 shots and 4.31 on target with a 9% conversion, which confirms both sides’ ability to create chances. Although BUL has 62% clean sheets and season over-2.5 rates are low (BUL 31%, Kitara 29%), the gap between xG (3.30) and actual scoring averages (BUL 1.77, Kitara 1.00, total 2.77) indicates potential for more goals in this fixture. A Poisson model on an expected total of 3.00 goals yields ~80% for Over 1.5, ~58% for Over 2.5 and ~35% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest and most likely signal from the data is a play on Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The hosts dominate at the break: they led at half-time in 10 of 13 matches (77%) and average 1.38 goals in the first half while conceding just 0.08, indicating strong control before the break. Over the full match they win 69% of games and average 1.77 goals per match versus the visitors' 1.00, while keeping a clean sheet in 62% of matches, which increases the likelihood of holding on to a lead. xG is similar (1.69 vs 1.61), but the hosts have better conversion (14% vs 9% for the visitors) and more shots on target (5.31 vs 4.31), supporting their efficiency. The visitors score only 0.50 goals on average by half-time and concede 0.50 by half-time, and the hosts have not been losing at half-time in any match (0%), so the scenario of the hosts leading after 45 minutes is dominant. Based on this I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal with about a 62% probability, while other options are much less likely (1/X 9%, X/X 15%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| BUL | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kitara is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - BUL · 1.4 pts / match - Kitara
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitara is 32% better for: goals scored per match.
1.04 goals / match - BUL · 1.37 goals / match - Kitara
Kitara is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - BUL · 0.67 goals / match - Kitara
BUL scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).
Kitara scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while BUL keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - BUL
Over / Under - Kitara
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - BUL · 2.04 pts / match - Kitara
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BUL - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
BUL
Kitara
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| BUL | Liga | Kitara | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.04 | 2.07 | • 2.04 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 34% | ▼ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 59% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 46% | 61% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: BUL 0 - 0 - 1 Kitara. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of BUL vs Kitara?
The Uganda Premier League match finished BUL 1:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before BUL vs Kitara?
BUL score 1.04 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.37. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 43% of BUL's matches and 33% of Kitara's.
What form are BUL and Kitara in?
Over the last 5 games BUL have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kitara 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BUL vs Kitara?
The statistical background for BUL vs Kitara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


