Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueKakindu Municipal StadiumData current as of 03 November 2026

BUL vs Kitara: match statistics

BUL crest
BUL
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Kitara crest
Kitara

BUL vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BUL played Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 19 May 2026. Venue: Kakindu Municipal Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

BUL: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kitara: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

BUL scores 1.04 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.37 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BUL 43%, Kitara 33%. Over 2.5: BUL 32%, Kitara 30%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.63. BUL: 11.1 shots per match, Kitara: 11.4.

Match halves

BUL: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. Kitara: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

BUL: 31-45+ (12 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The analysis indicates an advantage for Kitara: the team sits 3rd in the table versus BUL in 8th and has 16 wins this season compared to the hosts' 9. Defensively Kitara is more stable — they concede on average 0.86 goals away versus 1.14 conceded by BUL at home, and over the season the hosts have conceded 28 goals versus 18 for the visitors. BUL, however, creates more chances at home: on average 14.54 shots and 4.92 on target per match with xG 1.86, while Kitara away records 11.15 shots, 4.31 on target and xG 1.61; the hosts' issue is efficiency — only 8% conversion and 43% of matches without scoring versus 36% for the visitors. The last 5 matches for both teams yield an identical record (1 win, 2 draws, 2 losses, 1 point per match each), so form does not favor the hosts. Due to a better win record (16 vs 9), a lower goals-against rate and 50% away win rate, I forecast an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assess BTTS as more likely 'No' due to the home side's defensive strengths: BUL has a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.46 and as many as 62% of matches ending in a clean sheet. Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates below the league average — BUL 31% and Kitara 36% versus league 38% — indicating a lower-than-average frequency of both teams scoring. Arguments for 'Yes' exist: Kitara has xG_for 1.61 and scored 5 goals in the last 5 matches (1.0 average) with BTTS in 40% of their last 5, while BUL scores 1.77 goals seasonally with xG 1.69 and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20%, with 12.54 shots and 5.31 on target per home game. Consequently, despite some risk from the visitors' form (Kitara) and a short-term increase in BUL’s goals conceded to 1.2 per game over the last 5, the dominant seasonal figures (0.46 and 62%) and lower seasonal BTTS rates (31%/36%) favor 'No' (70%) over 'Yes' (30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG indicators for both teams are high: xG for BUL is 1.69 and for Kitara 1.61 (total 3.30). After accounting for defensive factors I project 1.56 goals for BUL and 1.44 for Kitara, i.e. roughly 3.00 goals in total. BUL averages 12.54 shots per match with 5.31 on target and a 14% conversion rate; Kitara averages 11.15 shots and 4.31 on target with a 9% conversion, which confirms both sides’ ability to create chances. Although BUL has 62% clean sheets and season over-2.5 rates are low (BUL 31%, Kitara 29%), the gap between xG (3.30) and actual scoring averages (BUL 1.77, Kitara 1.00, total 2.77) indicates potential for more goals in this fixture. A Poisson model on an expected total of 3.00 goals yields ~80% for Over 1.5, ~58% for Over 2.5 and ~35% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest and most likely signal from the data is a play on Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The hosts dominate at the break: they led at half-time in 10 of 13 matches (77%) and average 1.38 goals in the first half while conceding just 0.08, indicating strong control before the break. Over the full match they win 69% of games and average 1.77 goals per match versus the visitors' 1.00, while keeping a clean sheet in 62% of matches, which increases the likelihood of holding on to a lead. xG is similar (1.69 vs 1.61), but the hosts have better conversion (14% vs 9% for the visitors) and more shots on target (5.31 vs 4.31), supporting their efficiency. The visitors score only 0.50 goals on average by half-time and concede 0.50 by half-time, and the hosts have not been losing at half-time in any match (0%), so the scenario of the hosts leading after 45 minutes is dominant. Based on this I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal with about a 62% probability, while other options are much less likely (1/X 9%, X/X 15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
BULKitara
5Shots7
BULKitara
3Shots on target5
BULKitara
1xG1.34
BULKitara
3Corners6
BULKitara
63Dangerous attacks74
BULKitara
21Fouls12
BULKitara
0Cards0
BULKitara

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.04Goals scored / match1.37
BULKitara
1Goals conceded / match0.67
BULKitara
47%Average possession46%
BULKitara
4.18Shots on target / match4.59
BULKitara

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.07Shots per match11.37
BULKitara
4.18Shots on target4.59
BULKitara
9.4%Shot conversion12.1%
BULKitara
47%Possession46%
BULKitara
1.63xG for1.65
BULKitara
1.3xG against1.34
BULKitara

Shooting quality

BUL: BalancedKitara: Counter-attacking
BULKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitara is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - BUL · 1.4 pts / match - Kitara

BUL
LWLDD
Season result split
32% W32% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-10
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Kitara
DWWLL
Season result split
59% W19% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-6
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - BUL · 1.37 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - BUL · 0.67 goals / match - Kitara

BUL scoring profile: mixed

BUL scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: strong

Kitara scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while BUL keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).

29Goals scored (season)37
BULKitara
28Goals conceded (season)18
BULKitara
2.04Average goals in match2.04
BULKitara
4Goals scored (last 5)6
BULKitara
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
BULKitara

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal74%
BULKitara
21%2 goals41%
BULKitara
7%3 goals15%
BULKitara
4%4 goals7%
BULKitara

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal52%
BULKitara
25%2 goals11%
BULKitara
11%3 goals4%
BULKitara
4%4 goals0%
BULKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time7%
BULKitara
4%BTTS in both halves4%
BULKitara
11%Scored in both halves22%
BULKitara

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
BULKitara
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
BULKitara
20%BTTS - last 540%
BULKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
BULKitara
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
BULKitara
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
BULKitara

2nd half

46%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
BULKitara
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
BULKitara
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
BULKitara

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - BUL · 2.04 pts / match - Kitara

BUL - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
59% leading26% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)2.04
BULKitara
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.93
BULKitara
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
BULKitara
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.22
BULKitara
61%Clean sheet before half-time81%
BULKitara
54%No goal before half-time37%
BULKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.15
BULKitara
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
BULKitara
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.37
BULKitara
0.86Average goals (2nd half)0.81
BULKitara
71%Clean sheet after half-time63%
BULKitara
68%No goal after half-time67%
BULKitara

BUL - second-half results

18% W64% D18% L
38
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

19% W59% D22% L
55
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BUL - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BUL
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
4
3
16-30
12
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
2
4
16-30
11
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BUL

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.67
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

BULLigaKitara
Average goals in match• 2.042.07• 2.04
Both teams scored▲ 43%38%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 32%34%▼ 30%
Clean sheets▲ 43%38%▲ 48%
Goal before half-time▲ 64%59%▲ 74%
Goal after half-time▼ 46%61%▼ 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
0.81
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: BUL 0 - 0 - 1 Kitara. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of BUL vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished BUL 1:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before BUL vs Kitara?

BUL score 1.04 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.37. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 43% of BUL's matches and 33% of Kitara's.

What form are BUL and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games BUL have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kitara 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BUL vs Kitara?

The statistical background for BUL vs Kitara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.