Bunyodkor vs Pakhtakor: match statistics
Bunyodkor vs Pakhtakor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bunyodkor played Pakhtakor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: JAR Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Bunyodkor: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Pakhtakor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bunyodkor scores 1.08 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Pakhtakor scores 1.92 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.63 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bunyodkor 46%, Pakhtakor 69%. Over 2.5: Bunyodkor 46%, Pakhtakor 54%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Pakhtakor has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.19. Bunyodkor: 10.0 shots per match, Pakhtakor: 13.4.
Match halves
Bunyodkor: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.54. Pakhtakor: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Bunyodkor: 31-45+ (3 goals). Pakhtakor: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pakhtakor are the favorites: the visitors sit 2nd in the table versus the hosts' 7th place and have 9 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss this season, while Bunyodkor have 6 wins, 1 draw and 6 losses; the visitors have scored 25 goals compared to the hosts' 14. The attacking superiority of the visitors is clear — Pakhtakor away averages 12.4 shots and 4.8 on target per match with a 15% conversion, translating to an average of 1.8 goals, whereas Bunyodkor at home average 9.67 shots and 3.5 on target and 1.17 goals per match with a 12% conversion. Defensively the difference is significant: Pakhtakor concede only 0.8 goals on average away and have 40% clean sheets, while Bunyodkor concede 1.67 goals at home on average and have 17% clean sheets. In terms of chance quality Pakhtakor generate 1.44 xG away, while the hosts allow 1.92 xG in home matches; additionally Pakhtakor convert an average xG of 1.44 into 1.8 goals, indicating high efficiency. Considering form (visitors in their last five away: 4 wins and a draw), a zero percent rate of goalless away matches for Pakhtakor versus 17% goalless games for Bunyodkor and the hosts' weaker defensive metrics, I predict a win for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators favor a Both Teams To Score scenario — Bunyodkor has 75% matches with both teams scoring, Pakhtakor 60%, and the league average is 56%. The home side scores 2.0 goals per match (xG 1.65) and concedes 1.25, the visitors average 1.8 goals (xG 1.44) and concede only 0.8, indicating both sides can create and convert chances. In the last 5 matches Bunyodkor scored 9 and conceded 5 (avg 1.8 and 1.0), Pakhtakor 10 and 5 (2.0 and 1.0); recent xG is 1.73 for Bunyodkor and 1.92 for Pakhtakor with xG against 1.37 and 1.22, so both teams generate opportunities. The counterargument is Pakhtakor’s higher clean sheet rate 40% versus the home side’s 13%, but Pakhtakor also has 0% matches without scoring (i.e. they rarely fail to score), which offsets that factor. Considering season-long 75% vs 60% BTTS, the low share of home clean sheets and recent xG, I estimate a 68% chance for 'yes' and 32% for 'no' and recommend a "yes" (BTTS - Yes) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Considering xG, Bunyodkor has an offensive xG of 1.65, Pakhtakor 1.44, and their conceded xG are 1.23 and 1.06 respectively; the average of these pairs yields expected goals of 1.36 (Bunyodkor) and 1.33 (Pakhtakor), total 2.69. A Poisson model with λ=2.69 prices the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) at roughly 75%, which aligns with seasonal metrics: Bunyodkor has 100% of matches over 1.5, Pakhtakor 60%. At the 2.5 line seasonally Bunyodkor has 63% of matches over 2.5, Pakhtakor 40% (average ~51%), and the xG-sum 2.69 gives about a 50% chance of ≥3 goals, so the situation is balanced. The chance of over 3.5 goals is low (~28%) and season values confirm this: 38% for Bunyodkor and 20% for Pakhtakor. Additionally both teams create chances (Bunyodkor 14 shots and 5 on target, Pakhtakor 12.4 and 4.8) and BTTS is 75% and 60%, which reinforces a goals scenario at the low 1.5 line; therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Bunyodkor led at the break in 50% of their matches and scored an average of 1.13 goals in the first half while conceding just 0.38 by half-time, indicating their advantage at the break. Pakhtakor, however, have an excellent full-time record: they won 80% of away matches and on average concede only 0.8 goals per game, giving them a tangible advantage in final results. Second-half performance is crucial — the visitors score an average of 1.2 goals in the second half and have 60% wins in second halves, whereas Bunyodkor most frequently concede between the 46th and 60th minute (3 goals conceded). On this basis the most likely scenario is Bunyodkor leading at the break and Pakhtakor winning after the final whistle (HT/FT = 1/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bunyodkor | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pakhtakor is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Bunyodkor · 1.8 pts / match - Pakhtakor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pakhtakor is 78% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Bunyodkor · 1.92 goals / match - Pakhtakor
Pakhtakor is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Bunyodkor · 1.08 goals / match - Pakhtakor
Bunyodkor scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Pakhtakor keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Pakhtakor scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Bunyodkor keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bunyodkor
Over / Under - Pakhtakor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pakhtakor is 118% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Bunyodkor · 1.85 pts / match - Pakhtakor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bunyodkor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pakhtakor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bunyodkor
Pakhtakor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Bunyodkor | Liga | Pakhtakor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.23 | 2.63 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 57% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 53% | • 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 69% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Bunyodkor 0 - 1 - 1 Pakhtakor. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bunyodkor vs Pakhtakor?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Bunyodkor 0:1 Pakhtakor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bunyodkor and Pakhtakor?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Bunyodkor won 0, Pakhtakor won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bunyodkor vs Pakhtakor?
Bunyodkor score 1.08 goals per game on average and Pakhtakor 1.92. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Bunyodkor's matches and 69% of Pakhtakor's.
What form are Bunyodkor and Pakhtakor in?
Over the last 5 games Bunyodkor have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Pakhtakor 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bunyodkor vs Pakhtakor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


