Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: match statistics
Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Busan I'Park played Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Busan Gudeok Stadium. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Busan I'Park: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Paju Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Busan I'Park scores 2.00 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Paju Citizen scores 1.17 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Busan I'Park 75%, Paju Citizen 50%. Over 2.5: Busan I'Park 67%, Paju Citizen 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Busan I'Park has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.17. Busan I'Park: 12.3 shots per match, Paju Citizen: 9.1.
Match halves
Busan I'Park: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.00. Paju Citizen: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Busan I'Park: 31-45+ (7 goals). Paju Citizen: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Busan I'Park are the favorites: at home they score on average 1.8 goals and concede only 0.6 goals per match, with 4.2 shots on target on average and a conversion rate of 16%, and in home games they have an 80% win rate and 0% of matches without scoring. Paju Citizen away scores on average 1.2 goals and concedes 1.2 goals, has 4.0 shots on target and a lower conversion of 12%, with 20% of matches without a goal, indicating lower offensive efficiency. Pay attention to xG: Busan generates 1.25 xG at home versus 1.33 xG for the visitors away, but Paju allows on average 1.58 xG on the road, while Busan concedes 1.22 xG at home, which means the visitors create chances but are also more exposed defensively. Form is also on the hosts’ side — in the last 5 home matches they have a sequence 'dwwww' (4 wins, 1 draw) and 1.8 points per match in that run, while Paju averages 1.0 point in their last 5 matches ('wlddl'). On that basis I predict a Busan win, mainly due to superior defense (0.6 vs 1.2 goals conceded) and higher offensive efficiency (16% vs 12%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal for BTTS - Yes comes from league and seasonal context: 62% of league matches see both teams score, Paju has a seasonal BTTS of 60%, while Busan’s seasonal BTTS is 43% but 60% in the last 5 matches. Counterpoint is Paju’s poor scoring form in the last 5 — only 0.6 goals on average and 20% BTTS in that period — which reduces confidence they will score at least once. However, their xG in the last 5 is 1.06 versus an actual 0.6 goals, suggesting Paju can create chances and may improve finishing; additionally, season-long xG against Paju is 1.58, meaning they often concede quality chances. Busan, meanwhile, averages 1.6 goals and 1.36 xG in their last five, and opponents generate an average 1.54 xG against them, increasing the opponent’s scoring probability. Considering the league 62%, Paju’s seasonal 60% and Busan’s recent signals, against the counter-argument of Paju’s 20% BTTS in the last 5, I assess BTTS at 62% vs 38% and select 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG and defensive xG breakdown suggests approximately 2.63 goals in the match: attacking xG for Busan is 1.04, attacking xG for Paju 1.33, and xG against is 1.31 (Busan) and 1.58 (Paju), which averaged gives 1.31 for the home side and 1.32 for the away side (total 2.63). A Poisson model with lambda=2.63 indicates ~74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which aligns with seasonal Over 1.5 rates: 57% for Busan and 60% for Paju. For the 2.5 line Poisson gives ~49% for Over 2.5, but the league average goals of 2.73 and seasonal Over 2.5 figures (43% Busan vs 60% Paju, average ≈51.5%) provide a moderate edge for Over around 51%. The chance of Over 3.5 is low (~27%) and recent form supports this: the home side scored 8 goals in 5 matches (avg. 1.6), the away side 3 goals in 5 (avg. 0.6), so 4+ goals are unlikely. Consequently the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 1.5 with an estimated probability of 74%, based on combined xG of 2.63 and consistency with seasonal metrics.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the last 5 matches Busan I'Park led at the break in 60% of games and won 60% of those, indicating a strong start from the home side. In the same sample Busan averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for Paju, with overall half-time goals averaging 1.8 vs 0.6, so the first-half advantage is clear. Paju posts a higher xG (1.33 vs 1.04 for Busan) and attempts more shots (10.0 vs 8.43), so the visitors do create danger, but their recent form shows only a 20% win rate in 5 matches. At the same time Busan conceded as many as 6 goals in minutes 76–90 in the aggregated data, which raises the risk of draws or a turnaround late on; however, considering Busan’s 13 points earned by half-time (1.86 per match) versus Paju’s 6 points and 1.2 per match, the most likely scenario is Busan leading at 45' and winning to the final whistle (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Busan I'Park | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Busan I'Park is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1 pts / match - Paju Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Busan I'Park is 71% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.17 goals / match - Paju Citizen
Busan I'Park is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.25 goals / match - Paju Citizen
Busan I'Park scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
Paju Citizen scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Busan I'Park
Over / Under - Paju Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Busan I'Park is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1.58 pts / match - Paju Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Busan I'Park - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Busan I'Park
Paju Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Busan I'Park | Liga | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.17 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 75% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Busan I'Park 4:1 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?
Busan I'Park score 2.00 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.17. The K League 2 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Busan I'Park's matches and 50% of Paju Citizen's.
What form are Busan I'Park and Paju Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Busan I'Park have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paju Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


