South Korea - K League 2Busan Gudeok StadiumData current as of 08 September 2026

Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: match statistics

Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen

Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Busan I'Park played Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Busan Gudeok Stadium. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Busan I'Park: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Paju Citizen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Busan I'Park scores 2.00 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Paju Citizen scores 1.17 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Busan I'Park 75%, Paju Citizen 50%. Over 2.5: Busan I'Park 67%, Paju Citizen 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Busan I'Park has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.17. Busan I'Park: 12.3 shots per match, Paju Citizen: 9.1.

Match halves

Busan I'Park: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 1.00. Paju Citizen: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Busan I'Park: 31-45+ (7 goals). Paju Citizen: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Busan I'Park are the favorites: at home they score on average 1.8 goals and concede only 0.6 goals per match, with 4.2 shots on target on average and a conversion rate of 16%, and in home games they have an 80% win rate and 0% of matches without scoring. Paju Citizen away scores on average 1.2 goals and concedes 1.2 goals, has 4.0 shots on target and a lower conversion of 12%, with 20% of matches without a goal, indicating lower offensive efficiency. Pay attention to xG: Busan generates 1.25 xG at home versus 1.33 xG for the visitors away, but Paju allows on average 1.58 xG on the road, while Busan concedes 1.22 xG at home, which means the visitors create chances but are also more exposed defensively. Form is also on the hosts’ side — in the last 5 home matches they have a sequence 'dwwww' (4 wins, 1 draw) and 1.8 points per match in that run, while Paju averages 1.0 point in their last 5 matches ('wlddl'). On that basis I predict a Busan win, mainly due to superior defense (0.6 vs 1.2 goals conceded) and higher offensive efficiency (16% vs 12%).

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The dominant signal for BTTS - Yes comes from league and seasonal context: 62% of league matches see both teams score, Paju has a seasonal BTTS of 60%, while Busan’s seasonal BTTS is 43% but 60% in the last 5 matches. Counterpoint is Paju’s poor scoring form in the last 5 — only 0.6 goals on average and 20% BTTS in that period — which reduces confidence they will score at least once. However, their xG in the last 5 is 1.06 versus an actual 0.6 goals, suggesting Paju can create chances and may improve finishing; additionally, season-long xG against Paju is 1.58, meaning they often concede quality chances. Busan, meanwhile, averages 1.6 goals and 1.36 xG in their last five, and opponents generate an average 1.54 xG against them, increasing the opponent’s scoring probability. Considering the league 62%, Paju’s seasonal 60% and Busan’s recent signals, against the counter-argument of Paju’s 20% BTTS in the last 5, I assess BTTS at 62% vs 38% and select 'Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG and defensive xG breakdown suggests approximately 2.63 goals in the match: attacking xG for Busan is 1.04, attacking xG for Paju 1.33, and xG against is 1.31 (Busan) and 1.58 (Paju), which averaged gives 1.31 for the home side and 1.32 for the away side (total 2.63). A Poisson model with lambda=2.63 indicates ~74% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which aligns with seasonal Over 1.5 rates: 57% for Busan and 60% for Paju. For the 2.5 line Poisson gives ~49% for Over 2.5, but the league average goals of 2.73 and seasonal Over 2.5 figures (43% Busan vs 60% Paju, average ≈51.5%) provide a moderate edge for Over around 51%. The chance of Over 3.5 is low (~27%) and recent form supports this: the home side scored 8 goals in 5 matches (avg. 1.6), the away side 3 goals in 5 (avg. 0.6), so 4+ goals are unlikely. Consequently the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 1.5 with an estimated probability of 74%, based on combined xG of 2.63 and consistency with seasonal metrics.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches Busan I'Park led at the break in 60% of games and won 60% of those, indicating a strong start from the home side. In the same sample Busan averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for Paju, with overall half-time goals averaging 1.8 vs 0.6, so the first-half advantage is clear. Paju posts a higher xG (1.33 vs 1.04 for Busan) and attempts more shots (10.0 vs 8.43), so the visitors do create danger, but their recent form shows only a 20% win rate in 5 matches. At the same time Busan conceded as many as 6 goals in minutes 76–90 in the aggregated data, which raises the risk of draws or a turnaround late on; however, considering Busan’s 13 points earned by half-time (1.86 per match) versus Paju’s 6 points and 1.2 per match, the most likely scenario is Busan leading at 45' and winning to the final whistle (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
18Shots17
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
9Shots on target5
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
2.13xG2.16
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
8Corners6
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
52Dangerous attacks104
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
8Fouls4
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1Cards1
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
2Goals scored / match1.17
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1.17Goals conceded / match1.25
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
45%Average possession43%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
4.17Shots on target / match3.58
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.33Shots per match9.08
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
4.17Shots on target3.58
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
16.2%Shot conversion12.8%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
45%Possession43%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1.4xG for1.17
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1.49xG against1.42
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Shooting quality

Busan I'Park: Counter-attackingPaju Citizen: Counter-attacking
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Busan I'Park is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1 pts / match - Paju Citizen

Busan I'Park
WLWWL
Season result split
75% W8% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-2
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Paju Citizen
WLDDL
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-6
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 71% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.17 goals / match - Paju Citizen

Busan I'Park is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Busan I'Park · 1.25 goals / match - Paju Citizen

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

24Goals scored (season)14
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
14Goals conceded (season)15
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
3.17Average goals in match2.42
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
8Goals scored (last 5)3
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
75%2 goals42%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
25%3 goals8%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal67%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
25%2 goals33%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
17%3 goals25%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0%4 goals0%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time42%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
25%Scored in both halves25%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
60%BTTS - last 520%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Busan I'Park · 1.58 pts / match - Paju Citizen

Busan I'Park - half-time state
58% leading25% draw17% trailing
Paju Citizen - half-time state
33% leading58% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.58
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.25
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
58%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
25%No goal before half-time42%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
42%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen
50%No goal after half-time67%
Busan I'ParkPaju Citizen

Busan I'Park - second-half results

33% W50% R17% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - second-half results

25% W33% R42% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Busan I'Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
7
4
31-45
0
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Busan I'ParkLigaPaju Citizen
Average goals in match 3.172.73 2.42
Both teams scored 75%62% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%56% 50%
Clean sheets 25%24% 33%
Goal before half-time 92%75% 58%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paju CitizenYellow cardMin-Seung Kim
  2. Busan I'ParkGoalGabriel Honorio RamosAssist: Hyun-Min Kim
  3. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Taek-Geun LeeOff: Min-Seong Kim
  4. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Ga-On BaekOff: Dong-Soo Lee
  5. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Julián Andres Bonilla TovarOff: Hyeon-Byung Jeon
  6. Busan I'ParkGoalGabriel Honorio Ramos
  7. Paju CitizenGoalJae-jun YouAssist: Julio César Báez Meza
  8. Busan I'ParkGoalSe-Hoon KimAssist: Ga-On Baek
  9. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Chan-ho LeeOff: Julio César Báez Meza
  10. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Beom AhnOff: Cristian Renato Gonçalves Riquelme
  11. Busan I'ParkYellow cardHye-seong Park
  12. Busan I'ParkGoalJin-Hyeok KimAssist: Se-Hoon Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Busan I'Park 4:1 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?

Busan I'Park score 2.00 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.17. The K League 2 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Busan I'Park's matches and 50% of Paju Citizen's.

What form are Busan I'Park and Paju Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Busan I'Park have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paju Citizen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Busan I'Park vs Paju Citizen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.