Buxoro vs Qizilqum: match statistics
Buxoro vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Buxoro played Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 9 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Buxoro: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Qizilqum: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Buxoro scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 0.80 and concedes 1.60. League average: 2.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Buxoro 60%, Qizilqum 20%. Over 2.5: Buxoro 40%, Qizilqum 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Buxoro has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.10. Buxoro: 12.4 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.8.
Match halves
Buxoro: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80. Qizilqum: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Buxoro: 31-45+ (2 goals). Qizilqum: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.43 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Buxoro are favorites at home: they record a 67% win rate on their own turf, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per match, and in the last 5 matches they have scored 7 goals and won 3 of 5 (form: W W D W L). Qizilqum are more inconsistent away — they have 2 away wins and 3 defeats this season, averaging 1.00 goal scored and 1.00 conceded, and as many as 50% of away matches without scoring. The quality gap is shown by xG and shot metrics: Buxoro at home have xG 1.62 with 5.67 shots on target and 12.67 total shots, while the visitors away post xG 1.11 with 3 on target and 9 total. Defensively the hosts also look better on averages (0.67 conceded per home match versus 1.00 for Qizilqum), although the visitors have 50% clean sheets away; the visitors’ goal balance of 4–8 however indicates vulnerability. Considering PPG in the last 5 matches (2.0 vs 1.2), higher conversion (13% vs 11%) and superior shot and xG metrics, I give Buxoro the higher probability of winning.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor BTTS (Both Teams To Score — Yes) as the more likely outcome — 60% vs 40%. Both teams produce similar xG: 1.09 for Buxoro and 1.11 for Qizilqum, and the average on-target shots are 1.67 vs 3.0, indicating chance creation at both ends. Both defenses also concede a fair number of opportunities: xG against is 1.39 (Buxoro) and 1.64 (Qizilqum), and Buxoro concedes on average 2.0 goals per season with 0% clean sheets expected, which increases the likelihood of the opponent scoring. In the last 5 matches Buxoro had BTTS in 60% of games and averaged 1.4 goals, while Qizilqum had BTTS in 20% of their last 5 and averaged 0.8 goals — this shows the home side’s advantage in creating goals but also the visitors’ potential to respond. Considering the league average BTTS of 44% and Qizilqum’s conversion rate of 11% with 3.0 on-target shots, the Both Teams To Score scenario looks more probable than a No Goal/clean sheet for either side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.46 for Buxoro and 1.27 for Qizilqum (total 2.73), calculated from last 5 matches xG: home xG_for 1.45 vs away defense xG_against 1.47, and away xG_for 1.13 vs home defense xG_against 1.40. The 2.73 total is above the league average 2.44 and exceeds the 2.5 line, and the home side have 67% of home matches Over 2.5, which strengthens the Over signal. Countering that, the visitors have 50% clean sheets on the road and season-long 0% Over2.5 home/away, which weakens the outlook for a very high-scoring game (e.g. Over 3.5). Additionally, the away team are more clinical in finishing (3.0 SOT and 11% conversion vs home 1.67 SOT and 6% conversion), so with similar xG this increases the probability of additional goals. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over at the 2.5 line (hence the pick Over 2.5) with a high probability for Over 1.5 and a moderate probability for Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Qizilqum leading at half-time and the away team winning (2/2). Qizilqum were leading at the break in 50% of matches, while Buxoro were trailing at half-time in 67% of their games, which strongly favors HT=2. The visitors have a slightly higher xG (1.11 vs 1.09) and average 3.0 shots on target versus the hosts' 1.67, with a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 6%), so they are more efficient at creating and finishing chances. Buxoro concede on average 1.0 goals before the break and as hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet this season (0% half-time clean sheets), whereas Qizilqum have not conceded before half-time in the season stats (100% half-time clean sheets), therefore I assign 32% to 2/2 and 22% to the alternative X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Buxoro | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Buxoro is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Buxoro · 1.2 pts / match - Qizilqum
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buxoro is 75% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Buxoro · 0.8 goals / match - Qizilqum
Buxoro is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Buxoro · 1.6 goals / match - Qizilqum
Buxoro scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Qizilqum scores in 40% of matches (2 of 5 matches), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Buxoro
Over / Under - Qizilqum
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Buxoro
Qizilqum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Buxoro | Liga | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.40 | 2.43 | • 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 48% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 28% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 65% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 80% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Buxoro 1 - 0 - 1 Qizilqum. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Buxoro 2:0 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Buxoro and Qizilqum?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Buxoro won 1, Qizilqum won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
Buxoro score 1.40 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.80. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Buxoro's matches and 20% of Qizilqum's.
What form are Buxoro and Qizilqum in?
Over the last 5 games Buxoro have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Buxoro vs Qizilqum?
The statistical background for Buxoro vs Qizilqum — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


