Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of 13 September 2026

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: match statistics

CA La Paz crest
CA La Paz
1 : 1half-time 0:1
CDS Tampico Madero crest
CDS Tampico Madero
155%(2.30)
X30%(3.30)
215%(2.49)

CA La Paz performs significantly better at home, boasting a 50% win rate in home matches and an impressive 42% clean sheets. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per home game, with only 8% of matches failing to yield a goal, highlighting an effective offense. CDS Tampico Madero performs much worse on the road, with just a 33% win rate, 33% of matches without a goal, and a negative goal difference (-2). An advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), a significantly higher average number of shots (16.83 vs 9.87), and a better conversion rate (12% vs 9%) further favor the hosts. Good form from both teams in their last 5 matches (2 PPG each) suggests the possibility of a draw, however, CA La Paz's home advantage makes them the favorite for this fixture.

CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CA La Paz played CDS Tampico Madero in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

CA La Paz: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. CDS Tampico Madero: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CA La Paz scores 1.79 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.37 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CA La Paz 54%, CDS Tampico Madero 53%. Over 2.5: CA La Paz 63%, CDS Tampico Madero 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

CA La Paz has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.36. CA La Paz: 14.0 shots per match, CDS Tampico Madero: 12.2.

Match halves

CA La Paz: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.79. CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). CDS Tampico Madero: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ascenso MX: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CA La Paz performs significantly better at home, boasting a 50% win rate in home matches and an impressive 42% clean sheets. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per home game, with only 8% of matches failing to yield a goal, highlighting an effective offense. CDS Tampico Madero performs much worse on the road, with just a 33% win rate, 33% of matches without a goal, and a negative goal difference (-2). An advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), a significantly higher average number of shots (16.83 vs 9.87), and a better conversion rate (12% vs 9%) further favor the hosts. Good form from both teams in their last 5 matches (2 PPG each) suggests the possibility of a draw, however, CA La Paz's home advantage makes them the favorite for this fixture.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics suggest a high probability of a goal from the home team (1.8 goals/match, 1.47 xG), especially as CDS Tampico Madero allows many chances (1.59 xGA and 1.07 goals conceded/match). However, the key for BTTS is whether the away team scores, and here the signals are weaker: on average only 0.93 goals/match, low conversion rate (9%), and 33% of matches without a goal. CA La Paz defends solidly (0.87 goals conceded/match; in the last 5 matches only 0.4), which lowers the chances of an away goal. Although the seasonal BTTS for both teams is 53% (close to the league's 55%), the form from the last 5 matches indicates a drop in BTTS, especially for the home team (20%). As a result, the more likely scenario is a clean sheet victory or a match in which only one side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The goal model indicates a moderately high-scoring match: CA La Paz holds an advantage in chance creation (14.2 shots and 4.27 on target per game) and a solid xG for of 1.47, but Tampico Madero have defended very well in their last 5 matches (0.6 goals conceded and xG against of 0.86). The visitors are offensively average for the season (0.93 goals/match), while La Paz concede few goals (0.87 goals/match; only 0.4 in their last 5 games), which limits the goal ceiling. Historical over/under profiles also support a lower score range: under 3.5 is 60% for La Paz and as high as 80% for Tampico Madero. Additionally, both teams have only 40% of matches with over 2.5 goals in their last 5 games, which reduces the probability of 4+ goals. With an expected 2.45 goals, the most valuable and strongest line is under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

CA La Paz has a clearly better performance profile this season: 2.33 PPG and 73% win rate vs 1.40 PPG and 33% win rate for CDS Tampico Madero. The goal model favors the hosts (1.8 scored and 0.87 conceded) and points to the visitors' defensive issues in terms of chance quality (xGA 1.59). A draw at half-time is frequent: La Paz draws at HT in 47% of matches, and in the last 5 games, both teams have a 60% half-time draw rate. At the same time, La Paz is stronger after the break (2.07 PPG in the second halves, 1.07 goals/2H and 87% over 0.5 in 2H), which increases the chance of pushing for the result late in the game. Therefore, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a La Paz win in the full match (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
14Shots7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
6Shots on target3
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.83xG0.99
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
2Corners8
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
73Dangerous attacks46
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
7Fouls16
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3Cards2
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.79Goals scored / match1.37
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.5Goals conceded / match0.97
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Average possession53%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.67Shots on target / match3.93
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.04Shots per match12.2
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
5.67Shots on target3.93
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
12.8%Shot conversion11.2%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Possession53%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.65xG for1.36
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.66xG against1.27
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Shooting quality

CA La Paz: AttackingCDS Tampico Madero: Balanced
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
Accuracy (shots on target)40%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CA La Paz
LWWDW
Season result split
38% W38% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
CDS Tampico Madero
WWLWD
Season result split
53% W27% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-8-6
1.87 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CA La Paz is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.79 goals / match - CA La Paz · 1.37 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero

CDS Tampico Madero is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - CA La Paz · 0.97 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz scoring profile: very strong

CA La Paz scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

CDS Tampico Madero scoring profile: strong

CDS Tampico Madero scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).

43Goals scored (season)41
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
36Goals conceded (season)29
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
3.29Average goals in match2.33
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
10Goals scored (last 5)7
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal73%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
58%2 goals40%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
33%3 goals20%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
4%4 goals3%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
46%2 goals20%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
21%3 goals7%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
8%4 goals3%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
CDS Tampico Madero - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time20%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
17%BTTS in both halves7%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
38%Scored in both halves37%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
20%BTTS - last 540%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CA La Paz - half-time state
42% leading29% draw29% trailing
CDS Tampico Madero - half-time state
37% leading40% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.54Points per match (1st half)1.5
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1Goals scored (1st half)0.6
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.83Average goals (1st half)1.03
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
33%No goal before half-time53%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)1.6
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.3
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
50%Clean sheet after half-time60%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero
46%No goal after half-time37%
CA La PazCDS Tampico Madero

CA La Paz - second-half results

33% W46% D21% L
37
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding90%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
45
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CA La Paz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
CDS Tampico Madero - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CA La Paz
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
13
8
31-45
4
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

CDS Tampico Madero
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
10
3
16-30
6
6
31-45
10
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+78%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CA La Paz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

CDS Tampico Madero

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

CA La PazLigaCDS Tampico Madero
Average goals in match 3.292.92 2.33
Both teams scored 54%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%53% 43%
Clean sheets 33%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 83%74% 70%
Goal after half-time 71%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.74
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+47%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardDeivoon Magaña
  2. CA La PazYellow cardGilberto García Roa
  3. CDS Tampico MaderoYellow cardNéstor Alonso Corona Navarro
  4. CA La PazYellow cardHoracio Torres Martínez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jaime Orlando Montes SantosMatches officiated: 11
6Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 245%Home wins55%Draws0%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CA La Paz 0 - 0 - 1 CDS Tampico Madero. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Club Deportivo y Social Tampico Madero
3 : 2
Club Atlético La Paz

FAQ

What was the result of CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The Ascenso MX match finished CA La Paz 1:1 CDS Tampico Madero. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

CA La Paz score 1.79 goals per game on average and CDS Tampico Madero 1.37. The Ascenso MX average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CA La Paz's matches and 53% of CDS Tampico Madero's.

What form are CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero in?

Over the last 5 games CA La Paz have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CDS Tampico Madero 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?

The statistical background for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.