CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: match statistics
CA La Paz performs significantly better at home, boasting a 50% win rate in home matches and an impressive 42% clean sheets. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per home game, with only 8% of matches failing to yield a goal, highlighting an effective offense. CDS Tampico Madero performs much worse on the road, with just a 33% win rate, 33% of matches without a goal, and a negative goal difference (-2). An advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), a significantly higher average number of shots (16.83 vs 9.87), and a better conversion rate (12% vs 9%) further favor the hosts. Good form from both teams in their last 5 matches (2 PPG each) suggests the possibility of a draw, however, CA La Paz's home advantage makes them the favorite for this fixture.
CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CA La Paz played CDS Tampico Madero in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
CA La Paz: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. CDS Tampico Madero: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
CA La Paz scores 1.79 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.37 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CA La Paz 54%, CDS Tampico Madero 53%. Over 2.5: CA La Paz 63%, CDS Tampico Madero 43%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
CA La Paz has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.36. CA La Paz: 14.0 shots per match, CDS Tampico Madero: 12.2.
Match halves
CA La Paz: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.79. CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). CDS Tampico Madero: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CA La Paz performs significantly better at home, boasting a 50% win rate in home matches and an impressive 42% clean sheets. The hosts score an average of 2 goals per home game, with only 8% of matches failing to yield a goal, highlighting an effective offense. CDS Tampico Madero performs much worse on the road, with just a 33% win rate, 33% of matches without a goal, and a negative goal difference (-2). An advantage in possession (56% vs 53%), a significantly higher average number of shots (16.83 vs 9.87), and a better conversion rate (12% vs 9%) further favor the hosts. Good form from both teams in their last 5 matches (2 PPG each) suggests the possibility of a draw, however, CA La Paz's home advantage makes them the favorite for this fixture.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics suggest a high probability of a goal from the home team (1.8 goals/match, 1.47 xG), especially as CDS Tampico Madero allows many chances (1.59 xGA and 1.07 goals conceded/match). However, the key for BTTS is whether the away team scores, and here the signals are weaker: on average only 0.93 goals/match, low conversion rate (9%), and 33% of matches without a goal. CA La Paz defends solidly (0.87 goals conceded/match; in the last 5 matches only 0.4), which lowers the chances of an away goal. Although the seasonal BTTS for both teams is 53% (close to the league's 55%), the form from the last 5 matches indicates a drop in BTTS, especially for the home team (20%). As a result, the more likely scenario is a clean sheet victory or a match in which only one side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goal model indicates a moderately high-scoring match: CA La Paz holds an advantage in chance creation (14.2 shots and 4.27 on target per game) and a solid xG for of 1.47, but Tampico Madero have defended very well in their last 5 matches (0.6 goals conceded and xG against of 0.86). The visitors are offensively average for the season (0.93 goals/match), while La Paz concede few goals (0.87 goals/match; only 0.4 in their last 5 games), which limits the goal ceiling. Historical over/under profiles also support a lower score range: under 3.5 is 60% for La Paz and as high as 80% for Tampico Madero. Additionally, both teams have only 40% of matches with over 2.5 goals in their last 5 games, which reduces the probability of 4+ goals. With an expected 2.45 goals, the most valuable and strongest line is under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CA La Paz has a clearly better performance profile this season: 2.33 PPG and 73% win rate vs 1.40 PPG and 33% win rate for CDS Tampico Madero. The goal model favors the hosts (1.8 scored and 0.87 conceded) and points to the visitors' defensive issues in terms of chance quality (xGA 1.59). A draw at half-time is frequent: La Paz draws at HT in 47% of matches, and in the last 5 games, both teams have a 60% half-time draw rate. At the same time, La Paz is stronger after the break (2.07 PPG in the second halves, 1.07 goals/2H and 87% over 0.5 in 2H), which increases the chance of pushing for the result late in the game. Therefore, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a La Paz win in the full match (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CA La Paz | CDS Tampico Madero | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA La Paz is 31% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - CA La Paz · 1.37 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero
CDS Tampico Madero is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - CA La Paz · 0.97 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero
CA La Paz scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).
CDS Tampico Madero scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CA La Paz
Over / Under - CDS Tampico Madero
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CA La Paz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CA La Paz
CDS Tampico Madero
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| CA La Paz | Liga | CDS Tampico Madero | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.29 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 53% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CA La Paz 0 - 0 - 1 CDS Tampico Madero. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?
The Ascenso MX match finished CA La Paz 1:1 CDS Tampico Madero. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?
CA La Paz score 1.79 goals per game on average and CDS Tampico Madero 1.37. The Ascenso MX average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CA La Paz's matches and 53% of CDS Tampico Madero's.
What form are CA La Paz and CDS Tampico Madero in?
Over the last 5 games CA La Paz have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CDS Tampico Madero 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero?
The statistical background for CA La Paz vs CDS Tampico Madero — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


