CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos: match statistics
CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CA La Paz played Tepatitlán de Morelos in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
CA La Paz: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Tepatitlán de Morelos: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
CA La Paz scores 1.73 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Tepatitlán de Morelos scores 1.39 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CA La Paz 58%, Tepatitlán de Morelos 48%. Over 2.5: CA La Paz 62%, Tepatitlán de Morelos 39%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Tepatitlán de Morelos has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.64. CA La Paz: 13.8 shots per match, Tepatitlán de Morelos: 13.9.
Match halves
CA La Paz: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77. Tepatitlán de Morelos: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
CA La Paz: 31-45+ (13 goals). Tepatitlán de Morelos: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CA La Paz has a clear advantage in chance creation at home: averaging 16.62 shots per match, 7.23 on target, 57% possession and 1.96 average xG, while Tepatitlán away records 12.33 shots, 5.07 on target, 48% possession and 1.5 xG. The hosts score 1.92 goals at home on average and fail to score in only 8% of matches, whereas the visitors score 1.2 goals away and remain goalless in 40% of away games, which significantly limits their offensive potential. On the other hand Tepatitlán defends solidly by the numbers — conceding 1.07 goals away versus La Paz’s 1.46 conceded at home, and xG against is similar (1.41 vs 1.39), so both teams have scoring chances. In the last 5 matches the visitors have better points and goal output (2.0 points per game and 12 goals) than the hosts (1.6 points and 9 goals), but Tepatitlán’s high draw rate away (53%) and La Paz’s superiority in chance creation lead to favoring the hosts. Ultimately I back a CA La Paz win, though a draw remains a realistic and significant option.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In the league BTTS rate is 56%, with season values of 44% (CA La Paz) and 53% (Tepatitlán), which on average favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. In the last 5 matches the home side registered BTTS in 60% of games, while the visitors in 40%; the visitors averaged 2.4 goals in those five matches versus 1.8 for the hosts, highlighting their offensive potential. Season goal stats show CA La Paz scoring 1.56 and conceding 0.75 per match, while Tepatitlán scores 1.2 and concedes 1.07; additionally xG is 1.8 for the home side versus 1.41 xG against the visitors, and the visitors have xG 1.5 versus 1.25 for the hosts' defense. The low clean sheet percentage for the visitors at 27% (versus 44% for the hosts) and a similar number of shots on target (5.44 vs 5.07) increase the likelihood of goals from both sides, therefore I tip BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I calculated expected goals: 1.61 for CA La Paz (xG attack 1.80 and Tepatitlán xG defense 1.41) and 1.37 for Tepatitlán (xG attack 1.50 and home defense 1.25), totalling approximately 2.98 goals. This is slightly above the league average of 2.91, and seasonal metrics confirm a scoring tendency — CA La Paz has Over 1.5 in 75% of matches, Tepatitlán in 53%, with Over 0.5 in 94% and 80% of games respectively. Additionally, the hosts average 15.38 shots (5.44 on target) versus the visitors' 12.33 (5.07 on target), with an equal conversion rate of 10%, which increases the likelihood of at least two goals. A probabilistic model with μ≈2.98 yields about an 80% chance of Over 1.5, roughly 57% for Over 2.5 and about 35% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. I recommend the over side at the 1.5 line as the most statistically justified option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CA La Paz has a clear home advantage: they average 1.56 goals per match, record 1.88 points per match and win 56% of games, whereas Tepatitlán have only a 20% win rate and 1.13 points per match. The hosts lead at the break in 7 of 16 matches (44%) and score an average of 0.81 goals in the first half; 88% of their home fixtures feature at least one goal before halftime, so an HT lead for the home side is likely. CA La Paz have an xG of 1.8 versus the visitors’ xG of 1.5, and the away defense concedes an average of 1.41 xG per match; additionally the hosts have scored 9 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating a strong ability to close out games after the interval. On that basis the most probable scenario is the home team leading at half-time and winning after 90 minutes (1/1) at 25% probability, with notable alternatives: half-time draw and home win (X/1 16%) and the reverse scenario where the visitors lead at the break and win (2/2 21%) due to the visitors’ good recent form, having led at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CA La Paz | Tepatitlán de Morelos | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tepatitlán de Morelos is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - CA La Paz · 2 pts / match - Tepatitlán de Morelos
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA La Paz is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - CA La Paz · 1.39 goals / match - Tepatitlán de Morelos
Tepatitlán de Morelos is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.54 goals / match - CA La Paz · 0.9 goals / match - Tepatitlán de Morelos
CA La Paz scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Tepatitlán de Morelos keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 matches).
Tepatitlán de Morelos scores in 71% of matches (22 of 31 matches), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CA La Paz
Over / Under - Tepatitlán de Morelos
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CA La Paz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tepatitlán de Morelos - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CA La Paz
Tepatitlán de Morelos
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| CA La Paz | Liga | Tepatitlán de Morelos | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.27 | 2.91 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CA La Paz 1 - 0 - 0 Tepatitlán de Morelos. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
The Ascenso MX match finished CA La Paz 1:1 Tepatitlán de Morelos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
CA La Paz score 1.73 goals per game on average and Tepatitlán de Morelos 1.39. The Ascenso MX average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 58% of CA La Paz's matches and 48% of Tepatitlán de Morelos's.
What form are CA La Paz and Tepatitlán de Morelos in?
Over the last 5 games CA La Paz have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Tepatitlán de Morelos 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos?
The statistical background for CA La Paz vs Tepatitlán de Morelos — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


