CA Osasuna vs Atlético Madrid: match statistics
CA Osasuna vs Atlético Madrid: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CA Osasuna played Atlético Madrid in La Liga (Spain). The match was played on 12 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
CA Osasuna: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Atlético Madrid: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
CA Osasuna scores 1.20 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Atlético Madrid scores 1.66 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CA Osasuna 54%, Atlético Madrid 51%. Over 2.5: CA Osasuna 49%, Atlético Madrid 49%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Atlético Madrid has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.29. CA Osasuna: 11.2 shots per match, Atlético Madrid: 13.3.
Match halves
CA Osasuna: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.60. Atlético Madrid: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
CA Osasuna: 76-90+ (19 goals). Atlético Madrid: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
La Liga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Osasuna boasts strong home metrics: at home they average 1.71 goals scored per match, concede 1.18 and generate 1.57 xG with an average of 5.12 shots on target and 13.76 total shots. Atlético have a better overall season record (19 wins and 58 goals vs. Osasuna’s 11 wins and 42 goals), but away they score only 1.18 goals on average, concede 1.24 and have just a 29% away win rate. In their last five matches Atlético average 1.4 points per game (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses), while Osasuna average 0.8 points per game (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), which gives the visitors a slight form advantage. Additionally, the hosts have never finished a home match without scoring (0% scoreless home games), whereas Atlético failed to score in 18% of their away matches; combined with a higher shots-on-target rate (5.12 vs 3.88), this favors Osasuna. Considering the higher quality of the hosts’ chances (xG 1.57 vs away xG 1.31) and 53% home win rate versus Atlético’s 29% away win rate, I forecast a home victory, although a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics indicate a slightly higher probability for BTTS - Yes: Osasuna has a seasonal BTTS 50%, Atlético 53%, while the league BTTS level is 56%, supporting a Both Teams To Score selection. In the last 5 matches signals are mixed — Osasuna had BTTS 80% (4/5) and conceded on average 1.6 goals per game, whereas Atlético only 40% (2/5) and conceded 1.0 on average, suggesting the home side is more prone to Goal/Goal encounters. xG confirms a realistic chance for both sides: Osasuna home xG for 1.85 versus xG against Atlético 1.51 (Osasuna’s expected average ≈1.68), and Atlético away xG for 1.31 versus xG against Osasuna 0.99 (≈1.15), so both teams have projected goals ≥1.0. Additionally, the hosts average 6.39 shots on target with a 14% conversion vs Atlético 3.88 shots on target and 10% conversion, and clean sheets are moderate (Osasuna 39%, Atlético 35%), further increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Based on all the above figures I favor the 'Yes' variant with a probability of 68% versus 32% for 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG (Osasuna 1.85; Atlético 1.31) and average xG conceded (Osasuna 0.99; Atlético 1.51) we get expected goals of 1.68 for Osasuna (=(1.85+1.51)/2) and 1.15 for Atlético (=(1.31+0.99)/2), totaling 2.83. Osasuna at home averages 2.11 goals and 6.39 shots on target, while Atlético away averages 1.18 goals and 3.88 shots on target, giving the hosts an offensive edge. Season-long metrics show Over 1.5 in 72% of Osasuna’s matches and 76% of Atlético’s, and Over 2.5 in 56% vs 41%, so at least 2 goals is highly likely, whereas 3+ is less certain. A Poisson model with a total mean of 2.83 yields roughly 77–78% probability for Over 1.5, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~32% for Over 3.5; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Osasuna averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, and Atlético’s recent xG is 1.54, which further supports the scenario of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time appears most likely: the home team draws at the break in 61% of matches and the away team in 59%, so the HT scenario X (draw at half-time) is dominant. After the break, however, Osasuna holds the advantage — the hosts average 1.33 goals in the second half and win that half in 61% of matches, whereas Atlético scores only 0.47 goals on average after the break and wins the second half in 24% of matches. The quality gap is confirmed by xG (1.85 for the hosts versus 1.31 for the visitors), more shots on target (6.39 vs 3.88) and higher conversion rate (14% vs 10%), which increases the hosts’ chances of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, Osasuna win at home in 78% of matches versus Atlético’s 29% away wins, so the strongest signal from the data is X/1 — draw at half-time and home win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CA Osasuna | Atlético Madrid | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Atlético Madrid is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - CA Osasuna · 1.2 pts / match - Atlético Madrid
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Atlético Madrid is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - CA Osasuna · 1.66 goals / match - Atlético Madrid
Atlético Madrid is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.29 goals / match - CA Osasuna · 1.09 goals / match - Atlético Madrid
CA Osasuna scores in 69% of matches (24 of 35 matches), while Atlético Madrid keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 matches).
Atlético Madrid scores in 86% of matches (30 of 35 matches), while CA Osasuna keeps a clean sheet in 20% (7 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CA Osasuna
Over / Under - Atlético Madrid
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CA Osasuna is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - CA Osasuna · 1.46 pts / match - Atlético Madrid
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CA Osasuna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Atlético Madrid - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CA Osasuna
Atlético Madrid
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (La Liga).
Teams vs league
| CA Osasuna | Liga | Atlético Madrid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.49 | 2.69 | • 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 57% | ▼ 51% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 49% | 51% | ▼ 49% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 24% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 69% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 83% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CA Osasuna 0 - 0 - 1 Atlético Madrid. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CA Osasuna vs Atlético Madrid?
The La Liga match finished CA Osasuna 1:2 Atlético Madrid. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CA Osasuna vs Atlético Madrid?
CA Osasuna score 1.20 goals per game on average and Atlético Madrid 1.66. The La Liga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CA Osasuna's matches and 51% of Atlético Madrid's.
What form are CA Osasuna and Atlético Madrid in?
Over the last 5 games CA Osasuna have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Atlético Madrid 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA Osasuna vs Atlético Madrid?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


