CA Osasuna vs RCD Espanyol: match statistics
CA Osasuna vs RCD Espanyol: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CA Osasuna played RCD Espanyol in La Liga (Spain). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Estadio El Sadar. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
CA Osasuna: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. RCD Espanyol: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
CA Osasuna scores 1.19 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. RCD Espanyol scores 1.11 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CA Osasuna 56%, RCD Espanyol 56%. Over 2.5: CA Osasuna 50%, RCD Espanyol 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
RCD Espanyol has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.32. CA Osasuna: 11.5 shots per match, RCD Espanyol: 12.7.
Match halves
CA Osasuna: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.61. RCD Espanyol: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
CA Osasuna: 76-90+ (20 goals). RCD Espanyol: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
La Liga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CA Osasuna has the edge in chance quality and finishing efficiency: home average xG is 1.61 versus 1.28 for RCD Espanyol, and average goals at home are 1.67 compared to 1.11 on the road for the visitors. At El Sadar Osasuna averages 14.28 shots (5.11 on target) with a 12% conversion, while Espanyol away averages 12.11 shots (3.5 on target) and only 9% conversion, yielding fewer clear-cut chances. Defensively the hosts concede 1.22 goals per home game, while Espanyol concedes 1.67 on the road; additionally Osasuna have a +8 home goal difference, whereas the visitors are -10 away. Both teams are in poorer form (Osasuna 1 win in 5, 0.6 pts/game; Espanyol 1 win and 0.8 pts/game), but Osasuna scored 6 goals in the last 5 versus 3 for Espanyol and have not had a goalless home match (FTS 0% vs 22% for the visitors). Considering the xG advantage (1.61 vs 1.28), higher number of shots on target (5.11 vs 3.5) and better home metrics, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates indicate 50% for Osasuna and 61% for Espanyol, with a league average of 56%, yielding a baseline BTTS signal around 56%. In the last 5 matches Osasuna had BTTS in 80% (avg 1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded per game), while Espanyol only 20% (0.6 scored and 1.0 conceded), showing a clear contrast in form. xG shows 1.51 for Osasuna vs 1.28 for Espanyol in attack, while Espanyol has xG against 1.69 vs Osasuna's 1.34 — this suggests greater defensive vulnerability for Espanyol and a real chance of goals from both sides. Osasuna averages 13.22 shots and 4.67 on target with an 8% conversion, Espanyol 12.11 and 3.5 on target with a 9% conversion; the hosts' higher chance creation combined with Espanyol's seasonal 61% BTTS supports a both teams to score scenario. Considering these figures and the mix of seasonal and recent form, I assess BTTS probability at 62% for 'yes' and 38% for 'no', therefore I recommend the 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for this match is approximately 2.91 (Osasuna xG 1.51, Espanyol xG 1.28; when adjusted for opponent defense this yields expected goals of 1.60 for Osasuna and 1.31 for Espanyol), which is above the 2.5 threshold and indicates a higher goal potential. Season percentages of matches with over 1.5 goals are 78% for Osasuna and 72% for Espanyol, so I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at 85% (Under 15%). For the 2.5 line season values are 44% (Osasuna) and 56% (Espanyol); additionally Espanyol concedes xG against of 1.69 and has conceded 53 goals this season, so I estimate Over 2.5 at about 60%. Shot on target counts 4.67 (Osasuna) vs 3.5 (Espanyol) and the fact both teams have scored in 50% and 61% of matches respectively increases the probability of goals from both sides; the 3.5 line has much lower chances (Over ~28%). Based on this data the strongest and best signal is the Over on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics indicate a high probability of a draw at the break: hosts average 0.33 goals by half-time, visitors 0.33, and the half-time score is level in 50% of Osasuna’s matches and 61% of Espanyol’s matches (≈55% on average). Despite this, Osasuna shows superior full-match metrics: home xG is 1.51 versus Espanyol’s 1.28, and the season-long average points for the home side are 1.39 compared to 0.94 for the away team, suggesting higher quality and a greater capacity for a turnaround after the break. Additionally, in second halves the home team is more effective: on average 1.56 points in the second half and 44% of second halves won versus 1.11 points and 28% for Espanyol, which favors the hosts when the match is level at HT. Leading at the break is rare (Osasuna led at half-time in 17% of home matches, Espanyol in 11% of away matches), therefore the most reliable scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win after the break (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CA Osasuna | RCD Espanyol | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
RCD Espanyol is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - CA Osasuna · 0.8 pts / match - RCD Espanyol
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CA Osasuna is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - CA Osasuna · 1.11 goals / match - RCD Espanyol
CA Osasuna is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - CA Osasuna · 1.47 goals / match - RCD Espanyol
CA Osasuna scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while RCD Espanyol keeps a clean sheet in 28% (10 of 36 matches).
RCD Espanyol scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while CA Osasuna keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CA Osasuna
Over / Under - RCD Espanyol
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CA Osasuna is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - CA Osasuna · 0.97 pts / match - RCD Espanyol
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CA Osasuna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RCD Espanyol - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CA Osasuna
RCD Espanyol
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (La Liga).
Teams vs league
| CA Osasuna | Liga | RCD Espanyol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 57% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 24% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 69% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 83% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CA Osasuna 0 - 0 - 1 RCD Espanyol. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CA Osasuna vs RCD Espanyol?
The La Liga match finished CA Osasuna 1:2 RCD Espanyol. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CA Osasuna vs RCD Espanyol?
CA Osasuna score 1.19 goals per game on average and RCD Espanyol 1.11. The La Liga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of CA Osasuna's matches and 56% of RCD Espanyol's.
What form are CA Osasuna and RCD Espanyol in?
Over the last 5 games CA Osasuna have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and RCD Espanyol 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CA Osasuna vs RCD Espanyol?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


