Cacahuatique vs Firpo: match statistics
Firpo presents decidedly higher form and quality this season, confirmed by all key statistics. The visiting team has secured 20 victories with just 3 defeats, achieving an impressive 77% win rate in away matches and a goal difference of +18 on the road. Cacahuatique has weak home form with only 14% of matches won at their own stadium, a negative goal difference (-7), and a 50% loss rate at home. Firpo has not lost any of their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and has not recorded a single match without scoring away in the entire season, indicating a stable offense. With an average of 2.77 goals per away match for Firpo and weak defense from the hosts (averaging 1.5 goals conceded at home), the visitors' advantage is distinct. The difference in quality, form, and effectiveness clearly points to a victory for Firpo, though the hosts' experience in difficult situations may ensure the match is not one-sided.
Cacahuatique vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cacahuatique played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 4 February 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Cacahuatique: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Firpo: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cacahuatique scores 1.24 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.13 and concedes 1.06. League average: 2.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cacahuatique 59%, Firpo 58%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 66%, Firpo 58%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Firpo has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.32. Cacahuatique: 8.0 shots per match, Firpo: 11.1.
Match halves
Cacahuatique: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59. Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.39.
Goals by minute
Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (10 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Firpo presents decidedly higher form and quality this season, confirmed by all key statistics. The visiting team has secured 20 victories with just 3 defeats, achieving an impressive 77% win rate in away matches and a goal difference of +18 on the road. Cacahuatique has weak home form with only 14% of matches won at their own stadium, a negative goal difference (-7), and a 50% loss rate at home. Firpo has not lost any of their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and has not recorded a single match without scoring away in the entire season, indicating a stable offense. With an average of 2.77 goals per away match for Firpo and weak defense from the hosts (averaging 1.5 goals conceded at home), the visitors' advantage is distinct. The difference in quality, form, and effectiveness clearly points to a victory for Firpo, though the hosts' experience in difficult situations may ensure the match is not one-sided.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cacahuatique | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Firpo is 80% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.8 pts / match - Firpo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Firpo is 72% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 2.13 goals / match - Firpo
Firpo is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.41 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 1.06 goals / match - Firpo
Cacahuatique scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 matches).
Firpo scores in 84% of matches (26 of 31 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
Over / Under - Firpo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Firpo is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Cacahuatique · 1.55 pts / match - Firpo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Firpo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cacahuatique
Firpo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Cacahuatique | Liga | Firpo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.66 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 57% | • 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 66% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 27% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 68% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FirpoGoalNelson Vladimir Díaz Tobar
- FirpoGoalElías Josué Gumero Cruz
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Cacahuatique 0 - 0 - 2 Firpo. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Firpo?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 1:3 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Firpo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 0, Firpo won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Firpo?
Cacahuatique score 1.24 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.13. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Cacahuatique's matches and 58% of Firpo's.
What form are Cacahuatique and Firpo in?
Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Firpo 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Firpo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.