El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 24 July 2026

Cacahuatique vs Firpo: match statistics

Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
1 : 3half-time 1:0
Firpo crest
Firpo
115%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
265%(0.00)

Firpo presents decidedly higher form and quality this season, confirmed by all key statistics. The visiting team has secured 20 victories with just 3 defeats, achieving an impressive 77% win rate in away matches and a goal difference of +18 on the road. Cacahuatique has weak home form with only 14% of matches won at their own stadium, a negative goal difference (-7), and a 50% loss rate at home. Firpo has not lost any of their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and has not recorded a single match without scoring away in the entire season, indicating a stable offense. With an average of 2.77 goals per away match for Firpo and weak defense from the hosts (averaging 1.5 goals conceded at home), the visitors' advantage is distinct. The difference in quality, form, and effectiveness clearly points to a victory for Firpo, though the hosts' experience in difficult situations may ensure the match is not one-sided.

Cacahuatique vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cacahuatique play Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 4 February 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Firpo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Firpo scores 1.88 and concedes 1.04. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cacahuatique 57%, Firpo 57%. Over 2.5: Cacahuatique 55%, Firpo 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.40. Cacahuatique: 8.9 shots per match, Firpo: 11.2.

Match halves

Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55. Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.24.

Goals by minute

Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (26 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Firpo presents decidedly higher form and quality this season, confirmed by all key statistics. The visiting team has secured 20 victories with just 3 defeats, achieving an impressive 77% win rate in away matches and a goal difference of +18 on the road. Cacahuatique has weak home form with only 14% of matches won at their own stadium, a negative goal difference (-7), and a 50% loss rate at home. Firpo has not lost any of their last 5 matches (2 wins, 3 draws) and has not recorded a single match without scoring away in the entire season, indicating a stable offense. With an average of 2.77 goals per away match for Firpo and weak defense from the hosts (averaging 1.5 goals conceded at home), the visitors' advantage is distinct. The difference in quality, form, and effectiveness clearly points to a victory for Firpo, though the hosts' experience in difficult situations may ensure the match is not one-sided.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CacahuatiqueFirpo
18Shots19
CacahuatiqueFirpo
6Shots on target6
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.85xG1.98
CacahuatiqueFirpo
3Corners3
CacahuatiqueFirpo
42Dangerous attacks51
CacahuatiqueFirpo
14Fouls17
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0Cards0
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.18Goals scored / match1.88
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.37Goals conceded / match1.04
CacahuatiqueFirpo
47%Average possession52%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
4.27Shots on target / match4.96
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.88Shots per match11.24
CacahuatiqueFirpo
4.27Shots on target4.96
CacahuatiqueFirpo
13.3%Shot conversion16.8%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
47%Possession52%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.4xG for1.73
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.57xG against1.19
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Shooting quality

Cacahuatique: Counter-attackingFirpo: Efficient finishing
CacahuatiqueFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)48%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-10-11
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Firpo
DDDWL
Season result split
61% W24% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
31-12-8
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +43
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
16-5-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 1.88 goals / match - Firpo

Firpo is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Cacahuatique · 1.04 goals / match - Firpo

Cacahuatique scoring profile: strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (16 of 51 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 82% of matches (42 of 51 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

58Goals scored (season)96
CacahuatiqueFirpo
67Goals conceded (season)53
CacahuatiqueFirpo
2.55Average goals in match2.92
CacahuatiqueFirpo
5Goals scored (last 5)5
CacahuatiqueFirpo
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
CacahuatiqueFirpo

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal82%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
24%2 goals57%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
12%3 goals39%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
4%4 goals6%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal69%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
41%2 goals25%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
18%3 goals6%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
4%4 goals2%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0%BTTS in both halves6%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
12%Scored in both halves39%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
60%BTTS - last 580%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.47
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.65
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.49
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.14
CacahuatiqueFirpo
69%Clean sheet before half-time65%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
55%No goal before half-time51%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)2.12
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)1.24
CacahuatiqueFirpo
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
CacahuatiqueFirpo
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.78
CacahuatiqueFirpo
41%Clean sheet after half-time55%
CacahuatiqueFirpo
59%No goal after half-time27%
CacahuatiqueFirpo

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - second-half results

63% W24% R14% P
75
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
108
Second-half points
+35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
12
8
0-15
9
9
16-30
12
8
31-45
13
12
46-60
26
9
61-75
24
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CacahuatiqueLigaFirpo
Average goals in match 2.552.67 2.92
Both teams scored 57%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%50% 53%
Clean sheets 29%27% 31%
Goal before half-time 63%68% 67%
Goal after half-time 82%78% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Cacahuatique 0 - 0 - 3 Firpo. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Firpo
1 : 0
Cacahuatique
Firpo
3 : 0
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
1 : 3
Firpo

FAQ

What was the result of Cacahuatique vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Cacahuatique 1:3 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cacahuatique and Firpo?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cacahuatique won 0, Firpo won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cacahuatique vs Firpo?

Cacahuatique score 1.18 goals per game on average and Firpo 1.88. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Cacahuatique's matches and 57% of Firpo's.

What form are Cacahuatique and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games Cacahuatique have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Firpo 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cacahuatique vs Firpo?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.