Caen vs Concarneau: match statistics
Caen vs Concarneau: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Caen played Concarneau in National (France). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Caen: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Concarneau: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Caen scores 1.27 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Concarneau scores 1.00 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.38 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Caen 57%, Concarneau 40%. Over 2.5: Caen 40%, Concarneau 43%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Caen has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.30. Caen: 11.3 shots per match, Concarneau: 10.7.
Match halves
Caen: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.70. Concarneau: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Caen: 46-60 (9 goals). Concarneau: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
National: 2.38 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Caen is the favorite in this match due to a clear home-stat advantage: on average 57% possession, 12.67 shots per game and only 0.67 goals conceded at home, having scored 37 goals this season with 60% of home matches keeping a clean sheet. Concarneau away record shows just 43% possession, 7.87 shots per game, an average of 1.27 goals conceded and 33% clean sheets; the visitors failed to score in 40% of away fixtures, which limits their attacking threat. In the last 5 matches Caen scored 10 goals and averaged 2.2 points per match (3 wins, 2 draws), while Concarneau have 3 goals and 1.2 points in that period (1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss). xG differentials confirm this edge: Caen average xG 1.51 versus 1.11 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.07 for Caen and 1.44 for Concarneau, suggesting the hosts create better chances and restrict opponents more effectively. Although Concarneau show higher shot conversion (13% vs 8%), the lack of chances (fewer shots) and poorer away form favor a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis favors the 'no' scenario (65% vs 35%), primarily due to the visitors' poor attacking efficiency and Caen's strong defensive form. In the last 5 matches Caen has averaged 2.0 goals scored (10 in 5) and conceded 0.4 goals (2 conceded), while Concarneau has averaged 0.6 goals scored (3 in 5) and 1.0 goals conceded (5 conceded). xG and shot data confirm the home advantage: Caen's attacking xG is 1.48, averaging 13.6 shots and 4.93 shots on target per match, whereas Concarneau posts an attacking xG of 1.11 with 7.87 shots and 3.93 shots on target. Defensively Caen concedes an opponent xG of 0.81 and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of matches, while Concarneau allows an xG of 1.44 and has 33% clean sheets, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will not score. Seasonal BTTS rates are 33% for Caen vs 47% for Concarneau, with the league at 52%, however the recent goal distribution in the last 5 (10-3 in favor of Caen) and the lower away goals average (0.6) argue for the 'no' (No Goal / clean sheet expected) option.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects about 1.46 expected goals for Caen (1.48 xG scored by the home side vs 1.44 xG conceded by Concarneau) and about 0.96 for Concarneau (1.11 xG scored by the away side vs 0.81 xG conceded by Caen), totaling ~2.42 goals. Caen averages 13.6 shots and 4.93 on target per match versus Concarneau’s 7.87 and 3.93; in the last 5 matches Caen scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) compared to the opponent’s 3 goals (0.6), reinforcing the home side’s offensive edge. Seasonally, matches over 1.5 goals occur in 53% of Caen’s games and 80% of Concarneau’s, while over 2.5 is 40% and 47%, and over 3.5 only 20% for both—so the signal for Over 1.5 is clearer than for Over 2.5 or 3.5. Additionally, the league average is 2.38 goals per match and our expectation of 2.42 is slightly above that, so at least 2 goals is more likely than a very high-scoring game. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 (72% probability according to the model), while Over 2.5 has a moderate chance (~45%) and Over 3.5 a low chance (~20%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I favor the 1/1 scenario (Caen leading at half-time and winning the match). Caen has an average xG of 1.48 versus Concarneau’s 1.11 and averages 13.6 shots per game compared to the opponent’s 7.87, including 4.93 on target versus 3.93, which indicates a clear edge in chance creation. In the last 5 matches Caen led at the break in 4 of 5 games (80%), scoring on average 1.0 goal by half-time and conceding none (last 5: 1.0 scored, 0.0 conceded), while Concarneau led at the break in 20% and had 0.4 goals by half-time. After the break Caen continue to press — in the last 5 games they average 1.0 goal in the second half and have a second-half goal difference of +3, whereas Concarneau have only 0.2 goals after the break and a second-half goal difference of 0.0, which increases the likelihood of the home side maintaining the lead. Therefore the most likely outcome is 1/1 (I assign it 38%), the second-strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a Caen turnaround to win after the break (X/1) at 20%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Caen | Concarneau | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Caen is 83% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Caen · 1.2 pts / match - Concarneau
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Caen is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Caen · 1 goals / match - Concarneau
Caen is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - Caen · 1.17 goals / match - Concarneau
Caen scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while Concarneau keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Concarneau scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Caen keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Caen
Over / Under - Concarneau
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Caen is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / match - Caen · 1.27 pts / match - Concarneau
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Caen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Concarneau - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Caen
Concarneau
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National).
Teams vs league
| Caen | Liga | Concarneau | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.30 | 2.38 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 30% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 72% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Caen 0 - 1 - 0 Concarneau. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Caen vs Concarneau?
The National match finished Caen 0:0 Concarneau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Caen vs Concarneau?
Caen score 1.27 goals per game on average and Concarneau 1.00. The National average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Caen's matches and 40% of Concarneau's.
What form are Caen and Concarneau in?
Over the last 5 games Caen have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Concarneau 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Caen vs Concarneau?
The statistical background for Caen vs Concarneau — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


