Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Calvary vs Kitara: match statistics

Calvary crest
Calvary
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Kitara crest
Kitara
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Kitara is the clear favorite in this match. The hosts, Calvary, occupy the last 16th place in the table, have not won a single match this season, and have scored only 6 goals while conceding 24. Their home form is dismal – 0% wins, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a five-match winless streak. On the other hand, Kitara sits in 4th place with a record of 9 wins, displaying excellent form – 4 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.4 points per game. The visitors have better xG statistics (2.09 vs 1.91), shooting accuracy (8% vs 0%), and a 50% away win rate. The class difference between the two teams is clear, which points to a certain victory for Kitara.

Calvary vs Kitara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Calvary played Kitara in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 31 January 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Calvary: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Kitara: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Calvary scores 0.43 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Kitara scores 1.54 and concedes 0.77. League average: 2.32 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Calvary 29%, Kitara 38%. Over 2.5: Calvary 29%, Kitara 38%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Kitara has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.22. Calvary: 4.7 shots per match, Kitara: 12.4.

Match halves

Calvary: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.21. Kitara: half-time lead 62%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Calvary: 0-15 (3 goals). Kitara: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.32 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitara is the clear favorite in this match. The hosts, Calvary, occupy the last 16th place in the table, have not won a single match this season, and have scored only 6 goals while conceding 24. Their home form is dismal – 0% wins, 67% of matches without a goal scored, and a five-match winless streak. On the other hand, Kitara sits in 4th place with a record of 9 wins, displaying excellent form – 4 wins in their last 5 matches and an average of 2.4 points per game. The visitors have better xG statistics (2.09 vs 1.91), shooting accuracy (8% vs 0%), and a 50% away win rate. The class difference between the two teams is clear, which points to a certain victory for Kitara.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Shots-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Shots on target-1
CalvaryKitara
0xG0
CalvaryKitara
-1Corners-1
CalvaryKitara
0Dangerous attacks0
CalvaryKitara
-1Fouls-1
CalvaryKitara
-1Cards-1
CalvaryKitara

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.43Goals scored / match1.54
CalvaryKitara
1.71Goals conceded / match0.77
CalvaryKitara
24%Average possession47%
CalvaryKitara
1.14Shots on target / match5.08
CalvaryKitara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.71Shots per match12.38
CalvaryKitara
1.14Shots on target5.08
CalvaryKitara
9.1%Shot conversion12.4%
CalvaryKitara
24%Possession47%
CalvaryKitara
1.22xG for1.8
CalvaryKitara
1.7xG against1.43
CalvaryKitara

Shooting quality

Calvary: BalancedKitara: Counter-attacking
CalvaryKitara
Accuracy (shots on target)24%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitara is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Calvary · 2.4 pts / match - Kitara

Calvary
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W29% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-10
0.29 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Kitara
WLWWW
Season result split
69% W8% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-3
2.15 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.06Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitara is 258% better for: goals scored per match.

0.43 goals / match - Calvary · 1.54 goals / match - Kitara

Kitara is 122% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Calvary · 0.77 goals / match - Kitara

Calvary scoring profile: more difficult

Calvary scores in 29% of matches (4 of 14 matches), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

Kitara scoring profile: very strong

Kitara scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Calvary keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 matches).

6Goals scored (season)20
CalvaryKitara
24Goals conceded (season)10
CalvaryKitara
2.14Average goals in match2.31
CalvaryKitara
1Goals scored (last 5)8
CalvaryKitara
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
CalvaryKitara

How often they score at least...

29%1 goal77%
CalvaryKitara
14%2 goals46%
CalvaryKitara
0%3 goals23%
CalvaryKitara
0%4 goals8%
CalvaryKitara

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal62%
CalvaryKitara
43%2 goals15%
CalvaryKitara
29%3 goals0%
CalvaryKitara
21%4 goals0%
CalvaryKitara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time8%
CalvaryKitara
0%BTTS in both halves8%
CalvaryKitara
0%Scored in both halves23%
CalvaryKitara

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
CalvaryKitara
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
CalvaryKitara
20%BTTS - last 540%
CalvaryKitara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
CalvaryKitara
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
CalvaryKitara
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
CalvaryKitara

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
CalvaryKitara
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
CalvaryKitara
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
CalvaryKitara

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitara is 316% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Calvary · 2.08 pts / match - Kitara

Calvary - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Kitara - half-time state
62% leading23% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2.08
CalvaryKitara
0.07Goals scored (1st half)0.92
CalvaryKitara
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
CalvaryKitara
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.23
CalvaryKitara
50%Clean sheet before half-time77%
CalvaryKitara
93%No goal before half-time38%
CalvaryKitara

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)1.15
CalvaryKitara
0.21Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
CalvaryKitara
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
CalvaryKitara
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.08
CalvaryKitara
57%Clean sheet after half-time54%
CalvaryKitara
86%No goal after half-time62%
CalvaryKitara

Calvary - second-half results

7% W64% D29% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitara - second-half results

23% W46% D31% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 62% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Calvary - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kitara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Calvary
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
0
4
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Kitara
ScoredConceded
7
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Calvary

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
29%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
199%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Kitara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
179%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 35% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

CalvaryLigaKitara
Average goals in match 2.142.32 2.31
Both teams scored 29%43% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%41% 38%
Clean sheets 21%34% 38%
Goal before half-time 50%62% 77%
Goal after half-time 43%61% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.32
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
0.86
Away goals / match
+70%
Home attack advantage
+41%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Calvary vs Kitara?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Calvary 0:1 Kitara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Calvary vs Kitara?

Calvary score 0.43 goals per game on average and Kitara 1.54. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Calvary's matches and 38% of Kitara's.

What form are Calvary and Kitara in?

Over the last 5 games Calvary have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kitara 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Calvary vs Kitara?

The statistical background for Calvary vs Kitara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.