Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: match statistics
Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cambodia Tiger played Boeung Ket in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Cambodia Tiger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Boeung Ket: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cambodia Tiger scores 2.27 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Boeung Ket scores 1.35 and concedes 0.85. League average: 3.16 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cambodia Tiger 54%, Boeung Ket 35%. Over 2.5: Cambodia Tiger 69%, Boeung Ket 38%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Cambodia Tiger has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.46. Cambodia Tiger: 14.7 shots per match, Boeung Ket: 11.6.
Match halves
Cambodia Tiger: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.19. Boeung Ket: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Cambodia Tiger: 46-60 (12 goals). Boeung Ket: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Cambodian League: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) due to Cambodia Tiger’s clear offensive superiority at home: Cambodia Tiger averages 2.58 goals per home match with xG 2.12, while Boeung Ket averages 1.54 goals away with xG 1.56. Additionally, the hosts create substantially more chances — 17.92 shots and 5.92 on target per home game versus 12.23 shots and 4.62 on target for the visitors — and conversion rates are 14% vs 13%, enhancing the hosts’ offensive efficiency. On form, Boeung Ket are stronger in the last five matches — 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points per game and 8 goals in the last 5 — whereas the hosts in their last 5 have 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game with 7 scored. Defensively the seasonal difference is marginal: the hosts concede 1.17 goals at home on average versus Boeung Ket’s 1.23 conceded away, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded only 4 goals compared to the hosts’ 7. Overall, the advantage in quality of chances and higher home efficiency (xG 2.12 vs 1.56, 17.92 vs 12.23 shots) gives Cambodia Tiger a higher probability of victory, therefore I propose the distribution: 55% home, 25% draw, 20% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (BTTS - No), because the home side have a very high clean sheet rate this season: 54% of matches without conceding and only 0.46 goals conceded per game on average. Season-long BTTS rates for both teams are low: 38% for Cambodia Tiger and 31% for Boeung Ket, which contrasts with the league average of 56% and suggests these teams less frequently allow both sides to score. However, short-term signals point the other way — in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, and the home team conceded 1.4 goals on average in those five matches (compared to the seasonal 0.46). The visitors also have superior offensive metrics: 1.54 goals scored this season, 4.62 shots on target per game and xG 1.56, which increases their chance of scoring. Considering the strong seasonal defensive signal from the home team (54% clean sheets) and mixed but short-term offensive indications from the visitors, I forecast 'No' at 60% probability and 'Yes' at 40% as the most justified prediction.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate expected goals at 1.59 for the home team and 1.44 for the away team (total 3.03). These values are derived by averaging seasonal and last-5-match approaches: seasonal xG of the home attack 1.36 and xG conceded by the away side 1.64 yield 1.50, while the last 5 matches give 1.69 and 1.65 respectively (average 1.67), hence the mean 1.59; similarly for the away team seasonal attacking xG 1.56 and xG conceded to the home team 1.36 give 1.46, and the last 5 matches 1.66 and 1.18 give 1.42, averaging to 1.44. Seasonal figures confirm offensive potential: the home side scores 1.15 goals per game, the away side 1.54; in the last 5 matches 1.4 and 1.6 respectively (sum 3.0) and the league goals average of 3.16 indicate a tendency toward 2–3 goal matches. Seasonal over percentages show the home team had over 1.5 in 54% of matches and the away team in 77% (average 65%), therefore I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (72%). I assess Over 2.5 at 60% (seasonal 23%/54%, last 5 matches 40%/60%), while Over 3.5 remains low (28%) because seasonal values are 8%/31% (average 19.5%); the best market to play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal concerns the Half-Time result: hosts draw at the break in 62% of their matches, while visitors record a half-time draw in only 31%, which strongly favors a draw at 45 minutes. Over the full match the advantage appears to lie with the visitors: the visitors’ average goals scored is 1.54 per game with xG 1.56, versus the hosts’ 1.15 goals and xG 1.36, so the visitors both create and convert more chances. It is particularly important that the visitors average 1.00 goal in the second half and 100% of their matches have featured at least one goal after the break, whereas the hosts average 0.69 and only 62% of their matches have had a goal after the break, which increases the likelihood that the visitors will turn the game around after half-time. Additionally, in the last five meetings the visitors have won 60% of cases versus 40% for the hosts, therefore the most probable HT/FT scenario is a Half-Time draw with a Full-Time win for the visitors (X/2), although the hosts’ low average goals before the break of 0.46 and 92% of clean sheets for hosts at half-time also leave some chance of a full-time draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cambodia Tiger | Boeung Ket | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Boeung Ket is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.8 pts / match - Boeung Ket
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambodia Tiger is 68% better for: goals scored per match.
2.27 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.35 goals / match - Boeung Ket
Boeung Ket is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 0.85 goals / match - Boeung Ket
Cambodia Tiger scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Boeung Ket keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).
Boeung Ket scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Cambodia Tiger keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambodia Tiger
Over / Under - Boeung Ket
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambodia Tiger is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.85 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.62 pts / match - Boeung Ket
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambodia Tiger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 50%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Boeung Ket - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cambodia Tiger
Boeung Ket
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).
Teams vs league
| Cambodia Tiger | Liga | Boeung Ket | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.65 | 3.16 | ▼ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 57% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 59% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 25% | ▲ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 71% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 84% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cambodia Tiger 2 - 1 - 0 Boeung Ket. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?
The Cambodian League match finished Cambodia Tiger 2:0 Boeung Ket. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cambodia Tiger won 2, Boeung Ket won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?
Cambodia Tiger score 2.27 goals per game on average and Boeung Ket 1.35. The Cambodian League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Cambodia Tiger's matches and 35% of Boeung Ket's.
What form are Cambodia Tiger and Boeung Ket in?
Over the last 5 games Cambodia Tiger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Boeung Ket 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambodia Tiger vs Boeung Ket?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


