Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: match statistics
Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cambodia Tiger played Kirivong Sok Sen Chey in Cambodian League (Cambodia). The match was played on 28 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Cambodia Tiger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cambodia Tiger scores 2.67 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Kirivong Sok Sen Chey scores 1.17 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cambodia Tiger 42%, Kirivong Sok Sen Chey 58%. Over 2.5: Cambodia Tiger 83%, Kirivong Sok Sen Chey 67%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Cambodia Tiger has higher xG: 1.78 vs 1.12. Cambodia Tiger: 14.9 shots per match, Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: 9.0.
Match halves
Cambodia Tiger: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.58.
Goals by minute
Cambodia Tiger: 76-90+ (9 goals). Kirivong Sok Sen Chey: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Cambodian League: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cambodia Tiger | Kirivong Sok Sen Chey | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Cambodia Tiger is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.2 pts / match - Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cambodia Tiger is 128% better for: goals scored per match.
2.67 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 1.17 goals / match - Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
Cambodia Tiger is 58% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.42 goals / match - Cambodia Tiger · 2.25 goals / match - Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
Cambodia Tiger scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Kirivong Sok Sen Chey keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 matches).
Kirivong Sok Sen Chey scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Cambodia Tiger keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambodia Tiger
Over / Under - Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambodia Tiger is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Cambodia Tiger · 0.92 pts / match - Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambodia Tiger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kirivong Sok Sen Chey - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cambodia Tiger
Kirivong Sok Sen Chey
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Cambodian League).
Teams vs league
| Cambodia Tiger | Liga | Kirivong Sok Sen Chey | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.08 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 56% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 68% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 85% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Substitutes
Away team
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Cambodia Tiger 1 - 0 - 0 Kirivong Sok Sen Chey. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey?
The Cambodian League match finished Cambodia Tiger 0:0 Kirivong Sok Sen Chey. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey?
Cambodia Tiger score 2.67 goals per game on average and Kirivong Sok Sen Chey 1.17. The Cambodian League average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Cambodia Tiger's matches and 58% of Kirivong Sok Sen Chey's.
What form are Cambodia Tiger and Kirivong Sok Sen Chey in?
Over the last 5 games Cambodia Tiger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kirivong Sok Sen Chey 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey?
The statistical background for Cambodia Tiger vs Kirivong Sok Sen Chey — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.