England - EFL League TwoData current as of 12 September 2026

Cambridge United vs Gillingham: match statistics

Cambridge United crest
Cambridge United
5 : 0half-time 2:0
Gillingham crest
Gillingham
165%(1.61)
X22%(3.90)
213%(5.20)

Cambridge United demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts sit 3rd in the table with an impressive 65% home win rate and only 6% losses. In their last five matches, they have secured 2.2 points per game without suffering a single defeat. Gillingham is in weaker form, occupying 16th place with just 0.8 points per game over their last five clashes. The visitors win only 29% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.12 goals per game, whereas Cambridge scores an average of 1.65 goals in home fixtures while conceding merely 0.71 goals. Additionally, the +16 home goal difference for the hosts compared to the visitors' zero goal difference on the road confirms Cambridge United's superiority in this encounter.

Cambridge United vs Gillingham: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambridge United played Gillingham in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 14 March 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Cambridge United: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Gillingham: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambridge United scores 1.43 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Gillingham scores 1.23 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambridge United 51%, Gillingham 57%. Over 2.5: Cambridge United 34%, Gillingham 43%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Gillingham has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.37. Cambridge United: 11.3 shots per match, Gillingham: 13.5.

Match halves

Cambridge United: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.89. Gillingham: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Cambridge United: 76-90+ (12 goals). Gillingham: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cambridge United demonstrates significantly better form and statistics at their home stadium. The hosts sit 3rd in the table with an impressive 65% home win rate and only 6% losses. In their last five matches, they have secured 2.2 points per game without suffering a single defeat. Gillingham is in weaker form, occupying 16th place with just 0.8 points per game over their last five clashes. The visitors win only 29% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.12 goals per game, whereas Cambridge scores an average of 1.65 goals in home fixtures while conceding merely 0.71 goals. Additionally, the +16 home goal difference for the hosts compared to the visitors' zero goal difference on the road confirms Cambridge United's superiority in this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
18Shots6
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
5Shots on target0
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
1.93xG0.56
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
8Corners1
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
63Dangerous attacks23
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
10Fouls16
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0Cards3
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cambridge UnitedGillingham
1.43Goals scored / match1.23
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.8Goals conceded / match1.34
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
51%Average possession47%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
3.57Shots on target / match4.49
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.29Shots per match13.54
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
3.57Shots on target4.49
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
12.7%Shot conversion9.1%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
51%Possession47%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
1.37xG for1.54
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
1.02xG against1.41
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Shooting quality

Cambridge United: BalancedGillingham: Balanced
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
Accuracy (shots on target)32%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cambridge United is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Cambridge United · 0.8 pts / match - Gillingham

Cambridge United
WDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
51% W31% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-11-6
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-5-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Gillingham
LLWDL
Season result split
31% W34% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-12
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambridge United is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.23 goals / match - Gillingham

Cambridge United is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.34 goals / match - Gillingham

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 80% of matches (28 of 35 matches), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 23% (8 of 35 matches).

Gillingham scoring profile: strong

Gillingham scores in 77% of matches (27 of 35 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 matches).

50Goals scored (season)43
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
28Goals conceded (season)47
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
2.23Average goals in match2.57
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
8Goals scored (last 5)3
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal77%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
46%2 goals29%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
14%3 goals14%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
3%4 goals3%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal77%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
14%2 goals34%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
3%3 goals14%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0%4 goals6%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
Cambridge United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 35 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time17%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
23%Scored in both halves14%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
80%BTTS - last 540%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time49%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambridge United is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.51 pts / match - Cambridge United · 1.03 pts / match - Gillingham

Cambridge United - half-time state
37% leading40% draw23% trailing
Gillingham - half-time state
17% leading51% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.51Points per match (1st half)1.03
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.06
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
69%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
51%No goal before half-time69%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

After half-time (2nd half)

1.74Points per match (2nd half)1.43
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.51
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
63%Clean sheet after half-time49%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham
46%No goal after half-time40%
Cambridge UnitedGillingham

Cambridge United - second-half results

46% W37% D17% L
53
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.51
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 51%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gillingham - second-half results

34% W40% D26% L
36
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding182%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cambridge United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gillingham - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-6-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
11
7
31-45
10
4
46-60
9
6
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Gillingham
ScoredConceded
1
11
0-15
6
10
16-30
7
2
31-45
9
9
46-60
6
4
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Gillingham

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 2% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Cambridge UnitedLigaGillingham
Average goals in match 2.232.57 2.57
Both teams scored 51%54% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 34%47% 43%
Clean sheets 37%26% 23%
Goal before half-time 66%68% 54%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cambridge UnitedGoalDominic BallAssist: Louis Appere
  2. GillinghamYellow cardLenni Cirino
  3. Cambridge UnitedGoalLouis AppereAssist: Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu
  4. GillinghamYellow cardAndrew Smith
  5. GillinghamSubstitutionOn: Samuel Michael VokesOff: Nelson Khumbeni
  6. GillinghamGoalLenni Cirino
  7. Cambridge UnitedGoalSulaiman Borbor KaikaiAssist: Dominic Ball
  8. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Sean Aidan RaggettOff: James Andrew Gibbons
  9. GillinghamSubstitutionOn: Garath McClearyOff: Aaron Rowe
  10. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Kylian KouassiOff: Dominic Ball
  11. GillinghamYellow cardBradley Dack
  12. Cambridge UnitedGoalShayne LaveryAssist: Benjamin Leo Knight

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cambridge United 0 - 1 - 0 Gillingham. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

The EFL League Two match finished Cambridge United 5:0 Gillingham. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

Cambridge United score 1.43 goals per game on average and Gillingham 1.23. The EFL League Two average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Cambridge United's matches and 57% of Gillingham's.

What form are Cambridge United and Gillingham in?

Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Gillingham 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Gillingham?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.