England - EFL League OneAbbey StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town: match statistics

Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambridge United played Huddersfield Town in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Abbey Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Cambridge United: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Huddersfield Town: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambridge United scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Huddersfield Town scores 2.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambridge United 100%, Huddersfield Town 50%. Over 2.5: Cambridge United 50%, Huddersfield Town 50%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Cambridge United has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.49. Cambridge United: 12.5 shots per match, Huddersfield Town: 14.0.

Match halves

Cambridge United: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Huddersfield Town: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Cambridge United: 0-15 (1 goals). Huddersfield Town: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Huddersfield Town sit higher in the table, in 2nd place compared with Cambridge’s 6th, and have collected 11 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins and 2 draws. The visitors have been significantly more effective during this run, scoring 12 goals and conceding just 3, while Cambridge have scored 6 and allowed 4. Huddersfield also create more chances: away from home, they average 18 shots and 8 on target, compared with 16 and 6 for the hosts, while their average xG stands at 1.91 versus Cambridge’s 1.78. Cambridge won their only home match so far 3:2, but conceded 2 goals and allowed their opponents an xG of 1.80, which increases the visitors’ chances given Huddersfield’s attacking potential. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Huddersfield drew their only league away fixture, but a more stable defence and stronger current form point towards a narrow victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is supported by both teams’ recent form: in their last 5 matches, Cambridge United and Huddersfield Town have both seen this outcome in 60% of games, compared with a league average of 71%. Huddersfield have scored 2.4 goals per match over this period, while Cambridge have averaged 1.2, so the visitors should pose a clear attacking threat, although the hosts also have offensive arguments in their favour. The average xG from the last five appearances is very similar: 1.58 for Cambridge and 1.56 for Huddersfield, while both defences have allowed opponents 1.48 and 1.07 xG, respectively. The season data is less conclusive, as Cambridge have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their home matches so far, but Huddersfield average 18 shots and 8 on target per game, compared with 10 and 3 for the hosts. The visitors’ attacking edge and Cambridge’s consistent recent scoring potential marginally support BTTS - Yes, with a goal expected from both teams.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Huddersfield have averaged 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, while Cambridge have conceded 0.8 goals per game over the same period. Both teams create a solid number of chances: their five-match average xG stands at 1.58 for Cambridge and 1.56 for Huddersfield, supporting a projection of 2.70 total goals. In 100% of both teams’ matches so far, at least 2 goals have been scored, although the season sample is very small, so extreme percentages should not be overvalued. The last five matches produced Over 2.5 goals in 40% of Cambridge’s games and 60% of Huddersfield’s, meaning the 2.5 line remains finely balanced. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as the visitors’ attacking form and combined xG potential clearly point towards at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Recent form clearly favors Huddersfield: the visitors average 2.4 goals scored and 0.6 conceded per match, compared with Cambridge’s 1.2 and 0.8 respectively. Huddersfield have been leading at the break in 100% of their last five matches and have averaged 1.25 goals before half-time, while Cambridge have been level at this stage in 80% of their games and managed just 0.4 goals. The visitors’ attacking strength is further demonstrated by averages of 18 shots, 8 shots on target and an xG of 1.91, compared with 10 shots, 3 on target and an xG of 1.06 for the hosts. A draw at half-time remains a realistic scenario, given that both teams have kept a clean sheet in the first half in 100% of their last five matches, but Huddersfield’s superior quality favors a turnaround after the break. The visitors average 1.0 goal after half-time, while Cambridge concede 0.8 during that period, making X/2 the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
11Shots6
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
4Shots on target4
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1.33xG0.88
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
4Corners3
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
48Dangerous attacks29
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
14Fouls13
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
2Cards0
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
2Goals scored / match2
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1.5Goals conceded / match0.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
48%Average possession43%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
6Shots on target / match5.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match14
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
6Shots on target5.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
16%Shot conversion14.3%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
48%Possession43%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1.6xG for1.49
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1.45xG against1.35
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Shooting quality

Cambridge United: Efficient finishingHuddersfield Town: Counter-attacking
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
Accuracy (shots on target)48%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cambridge United
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Huddersfield Town
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Huddersfield Town is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Cambridge United · 0.5 goals / match - Huddersfield Town

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Huddersfield Town scoring profile: very strong

Huddersfield Town scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

4Goals scored (season)4
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
3Goals conceded (season)1
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
3.5Average goals in match2.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%2 goals50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%3 goals50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%4 goals0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%2 goals0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%3 goals0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%4 goals0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%Scored in both halves50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
100%BTTS - last 550%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Huddersfield Town is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Cambridge United · 3 pts / match - Huddersfield Town

Cambridge United - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Huddersfield Town - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)3
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1Goals scored (1st half)1.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
50%No goal before half-time0%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town
0%No goal after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedHuddersfield Town

Cambridge United - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.5

Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Huddersfield Town - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambridge United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.50
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.5
Average goals in match1.02.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals50%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Huddersfield Town - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.001.50
Goals scored / match1.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Huddersfield Town
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Huddersfield Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Cambridge UnitedLigaHuddersfield Town
Average goals in match 3.502.58 2.50
Both teams scored 100%65% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%50% 50%
Clean sheets 0%23% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%58% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardZak Bradshaw
  2. Cambridge UnitedGoalZak BradshawAssist: Raees Bangura-Williams
  3. Huddersfield TownGoalJoseph TaylorAssist: Bojan Radulović Samouković
  4. Huddersfield TownGoalJoseph Taylor
  5. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardLiam Bennett
  6. Huddersfield TownSubstitutionOn: Joe LowOff: Derensili Sanches Fernandes
  7. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Shayne LaveryOff: Callum Perry

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?

The EFL League One match finished Cambridge United 1:2 Huddersfield Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?

Cambridge United score 2.00 goals per game on average and Huddersfield Town 2.00. The EFL League One average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's matches and 50% of Huddersfield Town's.

What form are Cambridge United and Huddersfield Town in?

Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Huddersfield Town 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.