England - EFL League OneAbbey StadiumData current as of 23 October 2026

Cambridge United vs Reading: match statistics

Cambridge United crest
Cambridge United
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Reading crest
Reading

Cambridge United vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambridge United played Reading in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Abbey Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Cambridge United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Reading: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambridge United scores 1.80 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Reading scores 2.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambridge United 100%, Reading 50%. Over 2.5: Cambridge United 80%, Reading 75%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Reading has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.32. Cambridge United: 10.6 shots per match, Reading: 17.0.

Match halves

Cambridge United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. Reading: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Cambridge United: 31-45+ (2 goals). Reading: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Reading are unbeaten in their last five matches, earning 11 points from 3 wins and 2 draws, while Cambridge have collected just 5 points. The visitors have scored 12 goals and conceded only 2 during this period, compared with the hosts’ record of 6 goals scored and 7 conceded. Reading also have a clear advantage in terms of away-game control, averaging 63% possession compared with Cambridge’s 42% at home, while their average xG against stands at just 0.77 versus the hosts’ 1.34. On the other hand, Reading’s away data covers only a 0:0 draw and shows 100% of matches without scoring, making a draw a very realistic outcome. However, the better current form, recent attacking output and tighter defence marginally favour an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal for BTTS - No does not primarily come from Reading’s highly solid away defence: the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches and have yet to concede a goal. Cambridge do average 3.67 goals at home, generate 1.91 xG and have scored in every home game, but they will face a Reading defence whose away xG against is just 0.77. There is also a risk of the visitors failing to score, as their away scoring average is 0.00 and they have failed to score in 100% of such matches. Reading’s recent form is better, having scored 12 goals in their last five games, or 2.4 per match, so a Goal/Goal scenario cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the combination of Reading’s away clean sheets and their lack of attacking effectiveness on the road slightly favours the outcome in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The last five matches for both teams point to a game with goal-scoring potential: Cambridge averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while Reading scored as many as 2.4 goals per game and conceded just 0.4. Reading have won their last three matches, scoring 12 goals across their five most recent outings, while Cambridge conceded 7 during that period. For both teams, 3 of their last 5 matches ended with at least three goals, while the league-wide average is a high 3.17 goals per match. The xG from the last five matches suggests approximately 1.19 for Cambridge and 1.61 for Reading, supporting a projection of 2.75 total goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5, as just two goals are needed for it to land, while Reading’s current attacking form and the hosts’ unstable defence clearly increase the likelihood of this outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Reading are showing clearly superior current form: over their last 5 matches, they have averaged 2.4 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded, remaining unbeaten and winning 60% of those fixtures. The visitors took a lead at the break in 60% of these appearances, scored an average of 1.2 goals before half-time, and did not concede a single first-half goal. Over the same period, Cambridge scored just 0.2 goals before the break, failed to score in 80% of their matches, and recorded only one win in 5 games. Although the hosts have very strong figures from a small home sample, their recent form and Reading’s superiority at both ends of the pitch point primarily to an HT/FT scenario in which the visitors lead at the break and go on to win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Cambridge UnitedReading
11Shots19
Cambridge UnitedReading
5Shots on target4
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.42xG1.86
Cambridge UnitedReading
7Corners3
Cambridge UnitedReading
51Dangerous attacks53
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Fouls11
Cambridge UnitedReading
2Cards1
Cambridge UnitedReading

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cambridge UnitedReading
1.8Goals scored / match2.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.6Goals conceded / match1.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Average possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target / match5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.6Shots per match17
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
17%Shot conversion16.2%
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.32xG for1.74
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.47xG against1.08
Cambridge UnitedReading

Shooting quality

Cambridge United: Counter-attackingReading: Attacking
Cambridge UnitedReading
Accuracy (shots on target)40%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.52

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Reading is 9% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Cambridge United · 1.75 pts / match - Reading

Cambridge United
WDLWD
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Reading
LDWW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Cambridge United · 2.75 goals / match - Reading

Reading is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.25 goals / match - Reading

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

9Goals scored (season)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (season)5
Cambridge UnitedReading
3.4Average goals in match4
Cambridge UnitedReading
9Goals scored (last 5)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%3 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%3 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Scored in both halves50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%BTTS - last 550%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Cambridge United · 2.5 pts / match - Reading

Cambridge United - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Reading - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)2.5
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.8Average goals (1st half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
80%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%No goal before half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
2.6Average goals (2nd half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%No goal after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Cambridge United - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Reading - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambridge United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.82.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.501.75
Goals scored / match1.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Cambridge UnitedLigaReading
Average goals in match▲ 3.403.16▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%66%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%61%▲ 75%
Clean sheets▼ 0%20%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%68%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%84%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ReadingGoalJack Marriott
  2. Cambridge UnitedGoalLiam BennettAssist: Callum Perry
  3. Cambridge UnitedGoalKelland WattsAssist: Pelly Ruddock Mpanzu
  4. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardGassan Ahadme Yahyai
  5. Cambridge UnitedYellow cardCallum Perry
  6. ReadingYellow cardRandell Williams
  7. Cambridge UnitedSubstitutionOn: Louis AppereOff: Benjamin Leo Knight

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambridge United vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Cambridge United 2:1 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Reading?

Cambridge United score 1.80 goals per game on average and Reading 2.75. The EFL League One average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's matches and 50% of Reading's.

What form are Cambridge United and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Reading 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Reading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.