England - EFL League OneAbbey StadiumData current as of 08 September 2026

Cambridge United vs Reading: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Cambridge United vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambridge United play Reading in EFL League One (England). The match date is 12 September 2026. Venue: Abbey Stadium.

Current form

Cambridge United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Reading: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambridge United scores 1.80 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Reading scores 2.75 and concedes 1.25. League average: 3.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambridge United 100%, Reading 50%. Over 2.5: Cambridge United 80%, Reading 75%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Reading has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.32. Cambridge United: 10.6 shots per match, Reading: 17.3.

Match halves

Cambridge United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.20. Reading: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Cambridge United: 31-45+ (2 goals). Reading: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 3.17 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.46)
(3.30)
(2.65)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cambridge UnitedReading
1.8Goals scored / match2.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.6Goals conceded / match1.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Average possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target / match5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.6Shots per match17.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
4.2Shots on target5.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
17%Shot conversion15.9%
Cambridge UnitedReading
45%Possession48%
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.32xG for1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.47xG against1.09
Cambridge UnitedReading

Shooting quality

Cambridge United: Counter-attackingReading: Attacking
Cambridge UnitedReading
Accuracy (shots on target)40%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.52

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Reading is 9% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Cambridge United · 1.75 pts / match - Reading

Cambridge United
WDLWD
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Reading
LDWW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-1
1.75 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Cambridge United · 2.75 goals / match - Reading

Reading is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.25 goals / match - Reading

Cambridge United scoring profile: very strong

Cambridge United scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

9Goals scored (season)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (season)5
Cambridge UnitedReading
3.4Average goals in match4
Cambridge UnitedReading
9Goals scored (last 5)11
Cambridge UnitedReading
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%3 goals75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%2 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%3 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%4 goals25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Scored in both halves50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%BTTS - last 550%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Cambridge United · 2.5 pts / match - Reading

Cambridge United - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Reading - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)2.5
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Cambridge UnitedReading
0.8Average goals (1st half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
80%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Cambridge UnitedReading
60%No goal before half-time25%
Cambridge UnitedReading

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Cambridge UnitedReading
2.6Average goals (2nd half)2
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading
0%No goal after half-time50%
Cambridge UnitedReading

Cambridge United - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.2

Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Reading - second-half results

50% W25% R25% P
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambridge United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.82.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.501.75
Goals scored / match1.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%75%
3 goals50%50%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference+60
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 25% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambridge United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambridge United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
185%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Cambridge UnitedLigaReading
Average goals in match 3.403.17 4.00
Both teams scored 100%66% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%61% 75%
Clean sheets 0%20% 50%
Goal before half-time 40%68% 75%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.17
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.49
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

FAQ

When do Cambridge United and Reading play?

Cambridge United face Reading on 12 September 2026 in EFL League One at Abbey Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Reading?

Cambridge United score 1.80 goals per game on average and Reading 2.75. The EFL League One average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Cambridge United's matches and 50% of Reading's.

What form are Cambridge United and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Reading 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Reading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.