Cambridge United vs Swindon Town: match statistics
Cambridge United vs Swindon Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cambridge United played Swindon Town in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 2 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cambridge United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Swindon Town: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cambridge United scores 1.44 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Swindon Town scores 1.60 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.54 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cambridge United 46%, Swindon Town 57%. Over 2.5: Cambridge United 33%, Swindon Town 60%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Swindon Town has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.37. Cambridge United: 11.3 shots per match, Swindon Town: 12.2.
Match halves
Cambridge United: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.90. Swindon Town: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Cambridge United: 46-60 (13 goals). Swindon Town: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.54 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cambridge United holds a clear defensive edge at home — the hosts concede an average of 0.63 goals per home match versus 1.2 conceded by Swindon in away fixtures, and their average xG against is 1.00 compared to Swindon’s 1.52 on the road. Offensively the sides are comparable: Cambridge scores 1.79 goals per home game while Swindon averages 1.55 away, with xG 1.51 vs 1.43, indicating Cambridge’s advantage is primarily defensive. Swindon generates more shots on target (5.1 vs 4.47) and has a better season goals tally (64 vs 56), but concedes substantially more overall (46 vs 29) and has a smaller away goal difference (+7 vs Cambridge’s +22 at home). In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 7 goals and average 1.6 points per game, however Cambridge have conceded only 2 goals in that span versus Swindon’s 5, confirming their current defensive solidity. Based on these comparisons I give the hosts a slight edge: 58% win, 22% draw, 20% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season-long BTTS rates are 60% (Cambridge) and 55% (Swindon), with a league average of 51%, yielding a season baseline around 57% for BTTS - Yes. However, in the last 5 matches Cambridge have BTTS at only 20% and concede an average of 0.4 goals (2 conceded in 5 matches), while their recent xG against is just 0.82, indicating a very tight defense. Swindon in their last 5 have BTTS 60%, scored 7 and conceded 5 (avg. 1.4 and 1.0), and their recent xG against is 1.64, so they more often allow opponents chances. Season totals (Cambridge 56 scored / 29 conceded vs Swindon 64/46) confirm the hosts' defensive advantage despite the visitors' greater attacking output, therefore recent form and xG shift the probability toward No Goal (no BTTS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonally, Over 1.5 occurred in 85% of Cambridge matches and 80% of Swindon matches (average 82.5%), providing a strong signal for at least two goals. An xG-based model (Cambridge xG_for 1.38 vs xG_against Swindon 1.52 -> ≈1.45 for the home side; Swindon xG_for 1.43 vs xG_against Cambridge 1.30 -> ≈1.37 for the away side) suggests a combined expected goals total of approximately 2.82. In the last 5 matches Cambridge conceded only 2 goals (0.4 per match), while Swindon scored 7 and conceded 5 in their last 5, which increases the likelihood of goals; season-long BTTS rates are 60% (Cambridge) and 55% (Swindon). Seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 65% (average 60%) and our xG total of 2.82 gives a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (hence 65%), whereas Over 3.5 occurs only in 30%/25% of cases, so I lean Under there. The strongest and most reliable signal from the data is Over at the 1.5 line, therefore I recommend an "Over 1.5 goals" bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The first-half analysis indicates a draw at the break is highly likely: Cambridge are level at half-time in 55% of matches and Swindon in 45%, giving an average of about a 50% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. At half-time the home side score an average of 0.65 goals and the visitors 0.8, while xG is 1.38 for Cambridge versus 1.43 for Swindon, pointing to almost equal offensive potential in the opening period. The second half is decisive — Cambridge have superior metrics there: on average 1.65 points gained in second halves and 40% of second halves won, compared with 1.5 points and 35% for Swindon, and 85% of Cambridge matches see goals after the break versus 70% for Swindon, so a draw at the break is often overturned by the home side. Consequently I rate the scenario draw at half-time and Cambridge to win at full-time (X/1) highest — assigning it a 27% probability; other significant options are 1/1 (17%) and X/X (13%), which reflects the 50% probability of a half-time draw and the home-side advantage in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cambridge United | Swindon Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Swindon Town is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.6 goals / match - Swindon Town
Cambridge United is 55% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.74 goals / match - Cambridge United · 1.15 goals / match - Swindon Town
Cambridge United scores in 77% of matches (30 of 39 matches), while Swindon Town keeps a clean sheet in 33% (13 of 40 matches).
Swindon Town scores in 88% of matches (35 of 40 matches), while Cambridge United keeps a clean sheet in 41% (16 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cambridge United
Over / Under - Swindon Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cambridge United is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.51 pts / match - Cambridge United · 1.33 pts / match - Swindon Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cambridge United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 51%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Swindon Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cambridge United
Swindon Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Cambridge United | Liga | Swindon Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.18 | 2.54 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 46% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 67% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Cambridge United 0 - 0 - 1 Swindon Town. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cambridge United vs Swindon Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Cambridge United 1:1 Swindon Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cambridge United vs Swindon Town?
Cambridge United score 1.44 goals per game on average and Swindon Town 1.60. The EFL League Two average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Cambridge United's matches and 57% of Swindon Town's.
What form are Cambridge United and Swindon Town in?
Over the last 5 games Cambridge United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Swindon Town 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambridge United vs Swindon Town?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


