Netherlands - EredivisieKooi StadionData current as of 15 September 2026

Cambuur vs NEC: match statistics

Cambuur crest
Cambuur
3 : 0half-time 1:0
NEC crest
NEC

Cambuur vs NEC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cambuur played NEC in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Kooi Stadion. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Cambuur: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. NEC: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cambuur scores 1.20 and concedes 3.60 goals per match. NEC scores 2.20 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cambuur 80%, NEC 100%. Over 2.5: Cambuur 100%, NEC 100%. League level: BTTS 77%, Over 2.5 79%.

xG, shots and style

NEC has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.22. Cambuur: 11.6 shots per match, NEC: 15.8.

Match halves

Cambuur: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. NEC: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

Cambuur: 46-60 (2 goals). NEC: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eredivisie: 3.94 goals per match, BTTS 77%, Over 2.5 79%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

NEC have a clear quality advantage away from home: they have won both matches played so far, averaging 3.5 goals scored and avoiding defeat in either game. Cambuur have lost all three of their home fixtures, conceding as many as 4.33 goals per match and posting a -10 goal difference. The visitors create significantly more, averaging 14.5 shots and 7 on target compared with 10.33 and 3 respectively for the hosts, while their xG stands at 1.73 versus Cambuur’s 0.97. NEC’s defence limits opponents to 0.87 xG, whereas Cambuur allow 1.96, further supporting the scenario of numerous chances for the visitors. The hosts’ five-match winless run, during which they have conceded 18 goals, points towards a NEC victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: Cambuur and NEC have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, and neither team has kept a clean sheet. Cambuur concede an average of 2.5 goals per match, while NEC score as many as 3.5, so the visitors should consistently create chances against the hosts’ weak defence. The home side score only 1.0 goal on average, but generate a high 2.10 xG and register 19.5 shots per match, which supports their chances of scoring at least once. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, with Cambuur conceding an average of 3.6 goals and NEC 2.2. Additionally, the league has a BTTS rate of 78% and averages 4.05 goals per match, making the scenario in which both sides score more likely. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not automatically mean a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

This match has a clear goal-scoring profile: both teams exceeded 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, while Over 2.5 goals also landed in every one of them. In their last five appearances, Cambuur conceded as many as 3.6 goals per game, while NEC scored 1.8, strongly supporting a high-scoring projection for the visitors. Cambuur averaged 1.2 goals scored in their last five matches, while NEC allowed opponents 2.2 goals over the same period, meaning the hosts should also contribute to the total. Additionally, the league average stands at 4.05 goals, and both teams’ matches saw both sides score in 80% of their last five fixtures. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the 3.50-goal projection provides a substantial safety margin even if finishing efficiency is lower.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is NEC leading at half-time and the visitors winning, as NEC have won 100% of their away matches so far, averaging 3.5 goals scored and conceding just 1.0 per game. Cambuur have not won at home, average 0 points per match, and have a goal record of just 1.0 scored compared with 2.5 conceded. NEC’s advantage before the break is particularly pronounced: the visitors were leading at half-time in 100% of their away matches, while Cambuur have never led and have failed to score in the first halves. In their last five matches, Cambuur were trailing at half-time in 80% of cases, averaging 0.2 goals scored and conceding as many as 2.2 in that period. NEC average 7 shots on target compared with Cambuur’s 3 and have a 24% finishing rate versus the hosts’ 5%, further supporting the forecast of an early lead and its preservation until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
CambuurNEC
16Shots10
CambuurNEC
7Shots on target1
CambuurNEC
1.75xG1.02
CambuurNEC
4Corners5
CambuurNEC
34Dangerous attacks43
CambuurNEC
16Fouls18
CambuurNEC
2Cards4
CambuurNEC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match2.2
CambuurNEC
3.6Goals conceded / match1.8
CambuurNEC
50%Average possession64%
CambuurNEC
3.8Shots on target / match4.6
CambuurNEC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.6Shots per match15.8
CambuurNEC
3.8Shots on target4.6
CambuurNEC
10.3%Shot conversion13.9%
CambuurNEC
50%Possession64%
CambuurNEC
1.22xG for1.82
CambuurNEC
1.76xG against1.08
CambuurNEC

Shooting quality

Cambuur: BalancedNEC: Dominant
CambuurNEC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

NEC is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Cambuur · 1.4 pts / match - NEC

Cambuur
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
NEC
LWWLD
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 83% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Cambuur · 2.2 goals / match - NEC

NEC is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

3.6 goals / match - Cambuur · 1.8 goals / match - NEC

Cambuur scoring profile: very strong

Cambuur scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

NEC scoring profile: very strong

NEC scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Cambuur keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)11
CambuurNEC
18Goals conceded (season)9
CambuurNEC
4.8Average goals in match4
CambuurNEC
6Goals scored (last 5)11
CambuurNEC
18Goals conceded (last 5)9
CambuurNEC

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
CambuurNEC
40%2 goals60%
CambuurNEC
0%3 goals40%
CambuurNEC
0%4 goals20%
CambuurNEC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
CambuurNEC
100%2 goals60%
CambuurNEC
80%3 goals20%
CambuurNEC
60%4 goals0%
CambuurNEC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time40%
CambuurNEC
0%BTTS in both halves20%
CambuurNEC
0%Scored in both halves60%
CambuurNEC

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
CambuurNEC
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CambuurNEC
80%BTTS - last 5100%
CambuurNEC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
CambuurNEC
80%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
CambuurNEC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
CambuurNEC
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
CambuurNEC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 700% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.2 pts / match - Cambuur · 1.6 pts / match - NEC

Cambuur - half-time state
0% leading20% draw80% trailing
NEC - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.2Points per match (1st half)1.6
CambuurNEC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.8
CambuurNEC
2.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
CambuurNEC
2.4Average goals (1st half)1.6
CambuurNEC
20%Clean sheet before half-time40%
CambuurNEC
80%No goal before half-time40%
CambuurNEC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)2
CambuurNEC
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
CambuurNEC
1.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
CambuurNEC
2.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
CambuurNEC
0%Clean sheet after half-time40%
CambuurNEC
40%No goal after half-time0%
CambuurNEC

Cambuur - second-half results

20% W20% D60% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.20
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NEC - second-half results

60% W20% D20% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cambuur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match2.21.4
Average goals in match2.42.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
NEC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cambuur
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

NEC
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
90%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cambuur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

CambuurLigaNEC
Average goals in match 4.803.94 4.00
Both teams scored 80%77% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%79% 100%
Clean sheets 0%11% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%79% 80%
Goal after half-time 100%96% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.94
Average goals per match
77%
Both teams scored
79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
11%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
2.29
Away goals / match
+-28%
Home attack advantage
+-39%
Home defence advantage
+-23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
96%
1 goal
73%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CambuurGoalIlyes HamacheAssist: Billy van Duijl
  2. CambuurYellow cardDevid Eugene Bouah
  3. NECYellow cardTobias Storm
  4. NECYellow cardPhilippe Sandler
  5. CambuurGoalIlyes HamacheAssist: Fabian Kvam
  6. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Jamal AmofaOff: Mathieu Maertens
  7. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Sami BouhoudaneOff: Nicolas Binder
  8. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Iwan HenstraOff: Fabian Kvam
  9. NECSubstitutionOn: Kevin KersOff: Emre Mor
  10. NECYellow cardNoé Lebreton
  11. CambuurGoalIwan HenstraAssist: Jamal Amofa
  12. CambuurYellow cardIwan Henstra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Cambuur vs NEC?

The Eredivisie match finished Cambuur 3:0 NEC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cambuur vs NEC?

Cambuur score 1.20 goals per game on average and NEC 2.20. The Eredivisie average is 3.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 79% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Cambuur's matches and 100% of NEC's.

What form are Cambuur and NEC in?

Over the last 5 games Cambuur have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and NEC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cambuur vs NEC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.