Cancún vs CDS Tampico Madero: match statistics
Cancún vs CDS Tampico Madero: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cancún played CDS Tampico Madero in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Cancún: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. CDS Tampico Madero: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cancún scores 1.64 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.41 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cancún 58%, CDS Tampico Madero 57%. Over 2.5: Cancún 52%, CDS Tampico Madero 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
CDS Tampico Madero has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.35. Cancún: 11.0 shots per match, CDS Tampico Madero: 12.2.
Match halves
Cancún: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.76. CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Cancún: 31-45+ (12 goals). CDS Tampico Madero: 46-60 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cancún has a clear home advantage: they average 1.94 goals scored and concede only 0.69 goals per home match, while CDS Tampico Madero averages 1.06 goals scored and concedes 1.06 on the road. Additionally, Cancún generates more quality chances — at home they record 12.81 shots and 5.19 shots on target per game, versus Tampico’s 9.56 shots and 3.67 on target away; conversion rate is 15% for Cancún versus 11% for Tampico, and average xG is 1.61 vs 1.20. The home defense is also more stable: Cancún has 44% clean sheets at home and only 13% of matches without scoring, whereas Tampico has 28% clean sheets and 28% scoreless matches; home goal difference is +20, while away goal difference for the visitors is 0. Despite this, Tampico is in excellent form — winning 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals in that period and averaging 3 points per game, which increases upset risk. Considering Cancún’s superiority in chance creation and finishing (xG 1.61 vs 1.20, conversion 15% vs 11%) and the better home defense (0.69 conceded vs Tampico’s 1.06 away), I tip the home win; suggested probabilities are 60% for 1, 20% for draw and 20% for 2.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 53% (Cancún) and 61% (Tampico) versus a league average of 56%, which already favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. In the last 5 matches Cancún records BTTS 80% and Tampico 60%, with goals scored 7 and 9 (1.4 and 1.8 per match) and goals conceded 5 and 3 (1.0 and 0.6 per match), so both sides have recently been regularly scoring and conceding. Over the season Cancún has scored 54 goals and concedes 0.79 goals per match on average (31 conceded), has xG 1.48 and 14.0 shots per match, while Tampico has 52 goals, 34 conceded and a season xG 1.2 with xG against 1.7, which together increases the likelihood of exchanged goals. The counterargument is that Cancún has more clean sheets (37% vs 28%) and Tampico fails to score in 28% of matches versus 16% for Cancún, so there is a risk of one side being shut out. Considering Cancún’s offensive edge in stats (xG, shots) alongside Tampico’s high BTTS and recent form, I assess BTTS at 65% vs 35% and recommend the “BTTS - Yes” selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals by combining xG values: Cancún’s attack (xG 1.48) vs Tampico’s defense (xG against 1.70) yields ~1.59 for the home side, while Tampico’s attack (xG 1.20) vs Cancún’s defense (xG against 0.86) yields ~1.03 for the visitors, totalling ~2.62 goals. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.62, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is ~73.7%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) ~48.7%, and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) ~26.8%. Seasonal figures support this: Cancún at home averages 1.74 goals and has 63% of matches Over 1.5, Tampico away has 61% of such matches, and the league average goals is 2.86. The hosts average 14 shots (4.42 on target) versus the visitors’ 9.56 and 3.67, and BTTS occurs in 53% and 61% of cases respectively, which increases the chance of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 and I recommend a bet on the Over line 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data analysis indicates a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time. Cancún draws at the break in 53% of matches and keeps a clean sheet in 68% of first halves, which increases the probability of an HT draw. After the break the hosts score on average 1.11 goals versus 0.44 for the visitors, and in 89% of their matches they score at least once after half-time, while winning at home in 74% of fixtures. Cancún’s xG is 1.54 versus 1.20 for the away side, whereas the visitors concede an average xG against of 1.70, suggesting greater vulnerability in their defense to conceding. For these reasons the strongest signal is X/1 (draw at Half-Time and a home turnaround to win Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cancún | CDS Tampico Madero | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CDS Tampico Madero is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Cancún · 3 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cancún is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - Cancún · 1.41 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero
Cancún scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 37 matches).
CDS Tampico Madero scores in 78% of matches (29 of 37 matches), while Cancún keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cancún
Over / Under - CDS Tampico Madero
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cancún is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.97 pts / match - Cancún · 1.57 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cancún - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cancún
CDS Tampico Madero
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| Cancún | Liga | CDS Tampico Madero | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.58 | 2.86 | ▼ 2.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 52% | 53% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 25% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 74% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Cancún 0 - 0 - 3 CDS Tampico Madero. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cancún vs CDS Tampico Madero?
The Ascenso MX match finished Cancún 1:1 CDS Tampico Madero. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cancún and CDS Tampico Madero?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Cancún won 0, CDS Tampico Madero won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cancún vs CDS Tampico Madero?
Cancún score 1.64 goals per game on average and CDS Tampico Madero 1.41. The Ascenso MX average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Cancún's matches and 57% of CDS Tampico Madero's.
What form are Cancún and CDS Tampico Madero in?
Over the last 5 games Cancún have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CDS Tampico Madero 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cancún vs CDS Tampico Madero?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


