Cardiff MU vs Briton Ferry: match statistics
Cardiff MU vs Briton Ferry: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Cardiff MU played Briton Ferry in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Cyncoed Campus Artificial Pitch. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Cardiff MU: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match. Briton Ferry: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.
Goal statistics
Cardiff MU scores 2.00 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Briton Ferry scores 1.00 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Cardiff MU 25%, Briton Ferry 50%. Over 2.5: Cardiff MU 50%, Briton Ferry 25%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Briton Ferry has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.31. Cardiff MU: 10.0 shots per match, Briton Ferry: 11.5.
Match halves
Cardiff MU: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. Briton Ferry: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Cardiff MU: 76-90+ (3 goals). Briton Ferry: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Welsh Premier League: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cardiff MU have a clearly greater attacking potential at home: they average 3.00 goals per match, register 7 shots on target and convert 26% of their attempts, while Briton Ferry score only 0.67 goals away from home. The hosts also create more high-quality chances, posting an average xG of 1.52 compared with 1.08 for the visitors. However, Cardiff’s defence is the key argument against them, conceding 3.00 goals per home match with an xG against of 2.49 and having yet to keep a clean sheet. Briton Ferry are significantly more solid defensively away from home, conceding an average of 0.67 goals, and have collected 10 points from their last five matches thanks to 3 wins. Despite the visitors’ better recent run of form, Cardiff’s advantage in chance creation and finishing at home marginally supports a home win in a match where both sides could score.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Cardiff MU score an average of 2.0 goals at home and create a high volume of chances, supported by an xG of 2.65 and 6.0 shots on target per match. Briton Ferry have a lower goalscoring average of 0.67, but they have recently improved to 1.2 goals per game, while their average xG across the last five matches stands at 1.46. The hosts have conceded 1.8 goals per game in their last five appearances, with an xG against of 1.90, so their defensive form gives the visitors a realistic route to scoring. On the other hand, Briton Ferry have conceded only 0.8 goals during this period, but their season-long xG conceded is as high as 2.07, which, against Cardiff MU’s attacking strength, supports the possibility of a home goal. The BTTS signal is moderate; however, the combination of a highly likely Cardiff goal and the hosts’ recent defensive weakness slightly favours the scenario in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Cardiff MU score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Briton Ferry allow an average of 0.67 goals away from home. However, the difference in chance quality is clear: the hosts create 2.65 xG, whereas their opponents concede an average of 2.07 xG. Cardiff register as many as 23.0 shots and 6.0 shots on target per game, compared with just 7.67 attempts from Briton Ferry, which should provide the hosts with sustained pressure in the final third. In their last five matches, the two teams recorded games with Over 2.5 goals in 60% and 40% of cases respectively, while their average xG conceded stood at 1.90 and 1.75. Caution with higher goal lines is warranted because Briton Ferry have scored only 0.67 goals per away game and kept a clean sheet in 33% of their appearances. The strongest signal therefore remains Over 1.5 goals, as Cardiff’s tempo and creative superiority give them a high chance of producing at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time followed by a Cardiff MU win is the most likely outcome, as Briton Ferry were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, scoring an average of just 0.6 goals before half-time. Cardiff MU also do not necessarily need to take the lead early: over the same period, they scored 0.8 goals before the break, while their matches produced an average of 1.2 first-half goals. After the interval, however, the hosts’ advantage should increase, given their average xG of 2.65 compared with 1.08 for the visitors, while Briton Ferry allow opponents 2.07 xG per match. Cardiff also create significantly more chances, averaging 23 shots and 6 on target, compared with 7.67 and 2.67 respectively for their opponents. The hosts have won the second half in every available league match this season, while the visitors have not won a single one, further supporting the X/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Cardiff MU | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Briton Ferry is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / match - Cardiff MU · 1.75 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cardiff MU is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Cardiff MU · 1 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Briton Ferry is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Cardiff MU · 0.75 goals / match - Briton Ferry
Cardiff MU scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Briton Ferry keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Briton Ferry scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Cardiff MU keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cardiff MU
Over / Under - Briton Ferry
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Briton Ferry is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Cardiff MU · 2 pts / match - Briton Ferry
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cardiff MU - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Briton Ferry - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.75 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Cardiff MU
Briton Ferry
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Cardiff MU | Liga | Briton Ferry | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.75 | 2.88 | ▼ 1.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 75% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Cardiff MU 0 - 2 - 2 Briton Ferry. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Cardiff MU vs Briton Ferry?
The Welsh Premier League match finished Cardiff MU 3:0 Briton Ferry. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Cardiff MU and Briton Ferry?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Cardiff MU won 0, Briton Ferry won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Cardiff MU vs Briton Ferry?
Cardiff MU score 2.00 goals per game on average and Briton Ferry 1.00. The Welsh Premier League average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Cardiff MU's matches and 50% of Briton Ferry's.
What form are Cardiff MU and Briton Ferry in?
Over the last 5 games Cardiff MU have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Briton Ferry 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cardiff MU vs Briton Ferry?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


