United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 07 September 2026

Carolina Core vs FC Cincinnati II: match statistics

Carolina Core vs FC Cincinnati II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Carolina Core played FC Cincinnati II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Carolina Core: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. FC Cincinnati II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Carolina Core scores 1.39 and concedes 1.74 goals per match. FC Cincinnati II scores 1.04 and concedes 2.30. League average: 3.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Carolina Core 65%, FC Cincinnati II 52%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 61%, FC Cincinnati II 70%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Carolina Core has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.30. Carolina Core: 12.4 shots per match, FC Cincinnati II: 10.3.

Match halves

Carolina Core: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.78. FC Cincinnati II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Carolina Core: 31-45+ (9 goals). FC Cincinnati II: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.27 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Carolina Core have a clear home advantage: they win 42% of their home matches, while FC Cincinnati II have lost every away game and have a -24 goal difference on the road. The hosts average 1.67 goals at home with an xG of 1.63, whereas the visitors score just 0.60 goals away from home and fail to find the net in 50% of their appearances. Cincinnati II’s defence is particularly vulnerable, conceding an average of 3.00 goals per away match, keeping no clean sheets and allowing opponents an xG of 1.98. Recent form also favours Carolina: they have collected 8 points and scored 11 goals in their last five matches, while the visitors have managed just 1 point, lost 4 of their 5 games and conceded as many as 17 goals. With possession almost identical at 46% each, the outcome should be decided by the hosts’ greater attacking activity—they average 13.75 shots per match compared with the visitors’ 9.5—as well as Cincinnati II’s extremely poor away defensive record.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by FC Cincinnati II’s current form, with both teams scoring in 100% of their last 5 matches. Carolina Core recorded BTTS in 60% of their five most recent games, scoring an average of 2.2 goals, while Cincinnati II averaged 1.6 goals during the same period. The defensive statistics provide strong arguments for goals at both ends: the hosts have conceded 1.8 goals per match recently, while the visitors have conceded as many as 3.4, with their season average standing at 3.0 goals conceded. Carolina Core should regularly create chances against this defence, but their average xG against is 1.68, giving Cincinnati II a genuine chance of scoring. The season BTTS rates—58% for the hosts and 50% for the visitors—are below the league average of 61%, but the very strong data from the last five rounds shifts the edge towards a Goal/Goal scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Carolina Core have averaged 2.2 goals scored over their last five matches, while FC Cincinnati II have conceded as many as 3.4 goals per game over the same period. The hosts are currently creating chances worth an average of 1.65 xG, whereas the visitors’ defence allows opponents 1.99 xG, clearly strengthening the projection of at least two goals in the match. FC Cincinnati II have kept a clean sheet in none of their matches this season, while Over 1.5 goals has landed in 90% of their games, compared with 67% for Carolina. In addition, the two teams have exceeded the 2.5-goal line in 60% and 100% of their last five appearances, respectively, against a league average of 3.27 goals. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5, as the visitors’ weak defence and the hosts’ improved finishing significantly reduce the risk of a very low-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Carolina Core have a clear scoring advantage: they average 1.5 goals per match, while FC Cincinnati II concede as many as 3.0, and the visitors have lost all of their matches to date. The first half is particularly significant, with Cincinnati II trailing at the break in 80% of their games and conceding an average of 1.7 goals, without keeping a single clean sheet. The hosts led at half-time in 3 of 12 matches, but their recent form has been stronger: across their last five games, they averaged 2.2 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 3.4 goals during that period. After the break, Carolina Core average 1.0 goal compared with just 0.2 for Cincinnati II, so the most likely scenario remains a home lead at half-time followed by a home win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
20Shots7
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
4Shots on target4
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
2.07xG0.96
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
7Corners3
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
74Dangerous attacks33
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
12Fouls14
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
0Cards0
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.39Goals scored / match1.04
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.74Goals conceded / match2.3
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
47%Average possession43%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
4.52Shots on target / match3.61
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.43Shots per match10.26
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
4.52Shots on target3.61
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
11.2%Shot conversion10.2%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
47%Possession43%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.48xG for1.3
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.72xG against1.83
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Shooting quality

Carolina Core: BalancedFC Cincinnati II: Balanced
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Carolina Core is 700% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.2 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Carolina Core
DWLDW
Season result split
22% W35% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FC Cincinnati II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W9% R74% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-17
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-11
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 2.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Carolina Core is 34% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.04 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Carolina Core is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.74 goals / match - Carolina Core · 2.3 goals / match - FC Cincinnati II

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 65% of matches (15 of 23 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

32Goals scored (season)24
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
40Goals conceded (season)53
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
3.13Average goals in match3.35
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
11Goals scored (last 5)7
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
9Goals conceded (last 5)19
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal65%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
43%2 goals26%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
9%3 goals4%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
4%4 goals4%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal87%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
52%2 goals70%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
35%3 goals39%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
9%4 goals17%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
FC Cincinnati II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 23 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time26%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
4%BTTS in both halves4%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
22%Scored in both halves9%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Carolina Core is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.7 pts / match - FC Cincinnati II

Carolina Core - half-time state
26% leading26% draw48% trailing
FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
13% leading30% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per match (1st half)0.7
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.3
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.61Average goals (1st half)1.74
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
35%Clean sheet before half-time22%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
57%No goal before half-time65%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)0.91
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
57%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II
39%No goal after half-time61%
Carolina CoreFC Cincinnati II

Carolina Core - second-half results

35% W39% R26% P
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

22% W26% R52% P
16
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-20
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Carolina Core - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
FC Cincinnati II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match2.01.8
Average goals in match3.22.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference-4-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
9
16-30
9
9
31-45
8
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
4
12
16-30
3
9
31-45
4
5
46-60
4
8
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Carolina CoreLigaFC Cincinnati II
Average goals in match 3.133.27 3.35
Both teams scored 65%61% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%66% 70%
Clean sheets 26%22% 13%
Goal before half-time 87%76% 87%
Goal after half-time 78%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.27
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC Cincinnati IISubstitutionOn: Nathan GrayOff: Ademar Chavez
  2. FC Cincinnati IIAssistAyoub Lajhar
  3. FC Cincinnati IIGoalStefan Chirila
  4. FC Cincinnati IIGoalNathan GrayAssist: Yair Alexander Ramos Perez

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Carolina Core 1 - 0 - 0 FC Cincinnati II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Cincinnati II
2 : 3
Carolina Core FC

FAQ

What was the result of Carolina Core vs FC Cincinnati II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 1:3 FC Cincinnati II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs FC Cincinnati II?

Carolina Core score 1.39 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati II 1.04. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Carolina Core's matches and 52% of FC Cincinnati II's.

What form are Carolina Core and FC Cincinnati II in?

Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and FC Cincinnati II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs FC Cincinnati II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.