United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 08 September 2026

Carolina Core vs Huntsville City: match statistics

Carolina Core vs Huntsville City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Carolina Core played Huntsville City in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Carolina Core: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Huntsville City: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Carolina Core scores 1.19 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Huntsville City scores 1.93 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Carolina Core 69%, Huntsville City 64%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 63%, Huntsville City 86%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Huntsville City has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.37. Carolina Core: 11.4 shots per match, Huntsville City: 11.4.

Match halves

Carolina Core: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.81. Huntsville City: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Carolina Core: 46-60 (7 goals). Huntsville City: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Carolina Core has a clear home advantage: they score on average 1.57 goals per home match (xG 1.53) and concede 1.43 goals per match at home, while Huntsville City score 1.86 goals away (xG 1.43) but concede 2.86 goals per away match. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 7 and conceded 7, averaging 1 point per match, whereas the visitors scored 6 and conceded as many as 16, averaging 0.2 points per match. Additionally, Carolina attempt more shots at home (13.14 vs 11.43) and have 0% scoreless home matches, while Huntsville have 14% of away matches without a goal, which suggests greater home efficiency. The visitors have higher possession (52% vs 44%) and a better shot conversion rate (16% vs 12%), but their away defense is vulnerable (2.86 goals conceded) and that is the key weakness. Based on this, I predict a Carolina Core win, estimating probabilities of about 60% for the home side, 25% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a high rate of matches with goals from both sides: Carolina Core 57% and Huntsville City 71% this season, vs. a league BTTS average of 62%. In the last 5 fixtures the trend is even stronger: 60% for Carolina and 80% for Huntsville, indicating a low risk of a No Goal outcome. Goal and xG metrics confirm offensive pressure — Carolina scores 2.0 and concedes 1.71 on average this season, Huntsville scores 1.86 and concedes 2.86; xG is roughly 1.41 vs 1.43 for attack and 1.6 vs 1.66 for xG against, meaning both sides generate ~1.4 xG and allow ~1.6 xG. Additionally, 86% of both teams' matches finish over 2.5 goals, and Huntsville concedes 3.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches while Carolina has only 43% clean sheets at home, which strengthens the BTTS signal; therefore I tip BTTS - Yes (78%) vs No Goal 22%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model (1.41 xG for Carolina Core vs 1.66 xG allowed by Huntsville) yields approximately 1.54 xG for the home side and 1.52 xG for the visitors, totaling 3.06 expected goals, which points to Over 2.5 goals. Seasonal figures confirm an aggressive profile: matches >1.5 goals occur in 86% of Carolina’s games and 100% of Huntsville’s, while >2.5 goals occur in 86% for both teams. Both sides also show a high share of BTTS games — 57% for Carolina and 71% for Huntsville — and average 11.43 shots per match with 5.14 and 4.86 on target respectively, supporting chance creation. Additionally, Huntsville concedes 2.86 goals per game on average and Carolina 1.71 (xG against 1.66 and 1.60), increasing the likelihood of more goals, so the best and strongest play is Over 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hosts led at the break in 71% of matches (5 of 7), scoring on average 1.14 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.29, which strongly supports a home lead at the break (e.g., 1:0). Home xG is 1.41 versus the guests’ usual conceded xG of 1.66, so the hosts have a realistic chance of at least one goal, while the visitors’ xG of 1.43 against the hosts’ conceded xG of 1.60 indicates a moderate threat from the away side after the break. In the second half the visitors perform better—statistically 1.71 versus 1.14 for the hosts—and win second halves in 56% of cases, which increases the risk of an equalizer or a turnaround. However, the last 5 matches show poor form for the visitors: 0% wins in the last 5 and an average of 3.2 goals conceded, and across the season the visitors concede 2.86 goals per match, which raises the probability that the hosts will hold their lead. Taking this into account, the strongest and most reliable signal is the 1/1 scenario (hosts leading at half-time and winning Full-Time), hence the pick 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
21Shots5
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
6Shots on target3
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
2.34xG0.86
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
13Corners1
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
84Dangerous attacks45
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
12Fouls11
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0Cards1
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.19Goals scored / match1.93
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.75Goals conceded / match2.29
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
45%Average possession51%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
3.94Shots on target / match5
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.44Shots per match11.43
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
3.94Shots on target5
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
10.4%Shot conversion16.9%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
45%Possession51%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.37xG for1.42
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.77xG against1.63
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Shooting quality

Carolina Core: BalancedHuntsville City: Efficient finishing
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
Accuracy (shots on target)34%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Carolina Core is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.2 pts / match - Huntsville City

Carolina Core
DLWLD
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-8
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Huntsville City
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Huntsville City is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.19 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.93 goals / match - Huntsville City

Carolina Core is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - Carolina Core · 2.29 goals / match - Huntsville City

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Huntsville City keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

Huntsville City scoring profile: very strong

Huntsville City scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

19Goals scored (season)27
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
28Goals conceded (season)32
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
2.94Average goals in match4.21
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
7Goals conceded (last 5)16
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal86%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
44%2 goals64%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0%3 goals29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0%4 goals14%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal71%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
56%2 goals64%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
31%3 goals29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
6%4 goals29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time43%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
6%BTTS in both halves14%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
19%Scored in both halves36%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
60%BTTS - last 580%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Huntsville City is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / match - Carolina Core · 1.64 pts / match - Huntsville City

Carolina Core - half-time state
19% leading31% draw50% trailing
Huntsville City - half-time state
43% leading36% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per match (1st half)1.64
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0.38Goals scored (1st half)1
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0.94Goals conceded (1st half)1.07
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.31Average goals (1st half)2.07
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
31%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
69%No goal before half-time29%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.43
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)1.21
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
1.63Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City
38%No goal after half-time50%
Carolina CoreHuntsville City

Carolina Core - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Huntsville City - second-half results

43% W14% R43% P
23
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Carolina Core - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Huntsville City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.22.0
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
4
6
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Huntsville City
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Huntsville City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Carolina CoreLigaHuntsville City
Average goals in match 2.943.26 4.21
Both teams scored 69%63% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%66% 86%
Clean sheets 19%21% 29%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 86%
Goal after half-time 81%84% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.26
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Huntsville CityYellow cardKessy Setigui Fabou Coulibaly

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Carolina Core 0 - 1 - 3 Huntsville City. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Huntsville City
3 : 0
Carolina Core
Huntsville City FC
3 : 0
Carolina Core FC
Huntsville City FC
3 : 2
Carolina Core FC
Carolina Core FC
0 : 0
Huntsville City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 1:0 Huntsville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Carolina Core and Huntsville City?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Carolina Core won 0, Huntsville City won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?

Carolina Core score 1.19 goals per game on average and Huntsville City 1.93. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Carolina Core's matches and 64% of Huntsville City's.

What form are Carolina Core and Huntsville City in?

Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Huntsville City 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.