Carolina Core vs Huntsville City: match statistics
Carolina Core vs Huntsville City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Carolina Core played Huntsville City in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Carolina Core: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Huntsville City: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Carolina Core scores 1.19 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Huntsville City scores 1.93 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Carolina Core 69%, Huntsville City 64%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 63%, Huntsville City 86%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Huntsville City has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.37. Carolina Core: 11.4 shots per match, Huntsville City: 11.4.
Match halves
Carolina Core: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.81. Huntsville City: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Carolina Core: 46-60 (7 goals). Huntsville City: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 25%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Carolina Core has a clear home advantage: they score on average 1.57 goals per home match (xG 1.53) and concede 1.43 goals per match at home, while Huntsville City score 1.86 goals away (xG 1.43) but concede 2.86 goals per away match. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 7 and conceded 7, averaging 1 point per match, whereas the visitors scored 6 and conceded as many as 16, averaging 0.2 points per match. Additionally, Carolina attempt more shots at home (13.14 vs 11.43) and have 0% scoreless home matches, while Huntsville have 14% of away matches without a goal, which suggests greater home efficiency. The visitors have higher possession (52% vs 44%) and a better shot conversion rate (16% vs 12%), but their away defense is vulnerable (2.86 goals conceded) and that is the key weakness. Based on this, I predict a Carolina Core win, estimating probabilities of about 60% for the home side, 25% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a high rate of matches with goals from both sides: Carolina Core 57% and Huntsville City 71% this season, vs. a league BTTS average of 62%. In the last 5 fixtures the trend is even stronger: 60% for Carolina and 80% for Huntsville, indicating a low risk of a No Goal outcome. Goal and xG metrics confirm offensive pressure — Carolina scores 2.0 and concedes 1.71 on average this season, Huntsville scores 1.86 and concedes 2.86; xG is roughly 1.41 vs 1.43 for attack and 1.6 vs 1.66 for xG against, meaning both sides generate ~1.4 xG and allow ~1.6 xG. Additionally, 86% of both teams' matches finish over 2.5 goals, and Huntsville concedes 3.2 goals on average in the last 5 matches while Carolina has only 43% clean sheets at home, which strengthens the BTTS signal; therefore I tip BTTS - Yes (78%) vs No Goal 22%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model (1.41 xG for Carolina Core vs 1.66 xG allowed by Huntsville) yields approximately 1.54 xG for the home side and 1.52 xG for the visitors, totaling 3.06 expected goals, which points to Over 2.5 goals. Seasonal figures confirm an aggressive profile: matches >1.5 goals occur in 86% of Carolina’s games and 100% of Huntsville’s, while >2.5 goals occur in 86% for both teams. Both sides also show a high share of BTTS games — 57% for Carolina and 71% for Huntsville — and average 11.43 shots per match with 5.14 and 4.86 on target respectively, supporting chance creation. Additionally, Huntsville concedes 2.86 goals per game on average and Carolina 1.71 (xG against 1.66 and 1.60), increasing the likelihood of more goals, so the best and strongest play is Over 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hosts led at the break in 71% of matches (5 of 7), scoring on average 1.14 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.29, which strongly supports a home lead at the break (e.g., 1:0). Home xG is 1.41 versus the guests’ usual conceded xG of 1.66, so the hosts have a realistic chance of at least one goal, while the visitors’ xG of 1.43 against the hosts’ conceded xG of 1.60 indicates a moderate threat from the away side after the break. In the second half the visitors perform better—statistically 1.71 versus 1.14 for the hosts—and win second halves in 56% of cases, which increases the risk of an equalizer or a turnaround. However, the last 5 matches show poor form for the visitors: 0% wins in the last 5 and an average of 3.2 goals conceded, and across the season the visitors concede 2.86 goals per match, which raises the probability that the hosts will hold their lead. Taking this into account, the strongest and most reliable signal is the 1/1 scenario (hosts leading at half-time and winning Full-Time), hence the pick 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Carolina Core | Huntsville City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Carolina Core is 400% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.2 pts / match - Huntsville City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huntsville City is 62% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.93 goals / match - Huntsville City
Carolina Core is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Carolina Core · 2.29 goals / match - Huntsville City
Carolina Core scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while Huntsville City keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
Huntsville City scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Carolina Core
Over / Under - Huntsville City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huntsville City is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Carolina Core · 1.64 pts / match - Huntsville City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Carolina Core - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Huntsville City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 36%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Carolina Core
Huntsville City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Carolina Core | Liga | Huntsville City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.94 | 3.26 | ▲ 4.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 63% | • 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 63% | 66% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 21% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 84% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Carolina Core 0 - 1 - 3 Huntsville City. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 1:0 Huntsville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Carolina Core and Huntsville City?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Carolina Core won 0, Huntsville City won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?
Carolina Core score 1.19 goals per game on average and Huntsville City 1.93. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Carolina Core's matches and 64% of Huntsville City's.
What form are Carolina Core and Huntsville City in?
Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Huntsville City 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs Huntsville City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


