United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 06 September 2026

Carolina Core vs Inter Miami II: match statistics

Carolina Core crest
Carolina Core
4 : 0half-time 2:0
Inter Miami II crest
Inter Miami II

Carolina Core vs Inter Miami II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Carolina Core played Inter Miami II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 22 July 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Carolina Core: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Inter Miami II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Carolina Core scores 1.16 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Inter Miami II scores 0.88 and concedes 2.56. League average: 3.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Carolina Core 68%, Inter Miami II 63%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 58%, Inter Miami II 63%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Carolina Core has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.34. Carolina Core: 12.1 shots per match, Inter Miami II: 10.8.

Match halves

Carolina Core: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74. Inter Miami II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.44.

Goals by minute

Carolina Core: 46-60 (7 goals). Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.22 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Carolina Core have 3 wins this season versus 0 for Inter Miami II and sit higher in the table (26th vs 30th). Key advantages for the hosts include superior goal output (22 scored vs 14 for the visitors), higher shot conversion rate 11% vs 8%, and a lower average goals conceded at home 1.22 vs 2.7 away for Inter Miami II. Chance quality also favors Carolina Core — average xG for the hosts at home is 1.59 vs 1.36 xG for Inter Miami II on the road, and the hosts also deliver more shots on target per match (4.78 vs 4.3). Form and trends confirm the edge: in the last 5 matches Carolina Core have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (5 scored, 7 conceded) averaging 1.0 point per match, while Inter Miami II have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (2 scored, 9 conceded) averaging 0.2 points per match. Based on this I assess a 70% probability of a home win, 20% for a draw and 10% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Carolina Core has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%, Inter Miami II 60%, and the league average is 61%, indicating a tilt toward a Both Teams To Score scenario. Both sides are vulnerable at the back: Carolina concedes 2.33 goals per match on the season, Inter Miami II 2.7, and in the last 5 matches they conceded on average 1.4 and 1.8 goals respectively. In terms of creation, xG is 1.31 for Carolina and 1.36 for Inter Miami II, while xG against is 1.82 and 1.96 — teams are generating around 1.3 xG but allowing opponents close to 1.9 xG, which favors goal exchange. Clean sheet chances are low: seasonally 17% for the home side and 0% for the visitors (league 43%), while Over 2.5 occurs 50%/70% on the season, further supporting a goal-on-both-sides outcome. Considering the 67%/60% seasonal BTTS, high average concessions 2.33/2.7 and low CS 17%/0%, I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 72% vs No 28%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model indicates total expected goals around 3.23: home xG 1.31 and xG against for visitors 1.96 yield ~1.64 for Carolina Core, while visitors’ xG 1.36 and xG against for hosts 1.82 yield ~1.59 for Inter Miami II. Season metrics confirm a goal-prone tendency — Carolina has 83% of matches over 1.5 goals, Inter Miami II 80%, and over 2.5 occurs in 50% and 70% of matches respectively. Both sides concede heavily (Carolina 2.33 conceded goals per match, Inter Miami II 2.7) and the share of matches with Both Teams To Score is 67% for the hosts and 60% for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. In the last 5 matches the hosts have xG 1.63 and scored 5 goals, while the visitors have xG 1.22 and scored 2 goals, showing Carolina creates more chances but the overall goal volume remains high. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimated probability 88%), with a concurrently high probability for Over 2.5 (72%) given the projected ~3.23 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back a Half-Time/Full-Time draw/draw (X/X) as the most likely scenario: the home side averages 0.33 goals by the break, the visitors 0.50, and both teams concede on average 1.00 goal before half-time, which favors balanced first halves. Hosts were level at the break in 50% of matches, visitors in 20%, while both teams have 0% wins this season and a relatively high share of draws (hosts 33% draws, visitors 20% draws), increasing the likelihood of a point split. xG figures are similar (1.31 vs 1.36), and average shots on target are 5.0 for the home team and 4.3 for the visitors — indicating comparable quality of chances and supporting a draw outcome. However, most goals occur after the break: 83% of the home team’s games and 90% of the visitors’ games feature second-half goals, so alternative scenarios like X/2 and 1/X also carry significant probability. For these reasons I assigned the highest probability to X/X.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
15Shots24
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
10Shots on target6
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.99xG2.37
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
5Corners9
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
47Dangerous attacks61
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
13Fouls10
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0Cards2
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.16Goals scored / match0.88
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.68Goals conceded / match2.56
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
47%Average possession54%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
4.26Shots on target / match4.56
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.05Shots per match10.81
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
4.26Shots on target4.56
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
9.6%Shot conversion8.1%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
47%Possession54%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.43xG for1.34
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.72xG against1.91
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Shooting quality

Carolina Core: BalancedInter Miami II: Balanced
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Carolina Core is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.2 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Carolina Core
LDWLD
Season result split
16% W37% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-9
0.84 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Inter Miami II
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-12
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Carolina Core is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Carolina Core · 0.88 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Carolina Core is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - Carolina Core · 2.56 goals / match - Inter Miami II

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

Inter Miami II scoring profile: strong

Inter Miami II scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

22Goals scored (season)14
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
32Goals conceded (season)41
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
2.84Average goals in match3.44
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
5Goals scored (last 5)2
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal63%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
37%2 goals13%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0%3 goals6%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0%4 goals6%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal94%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
53%2 goals69%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
32%3 goals56%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
5%4 goals31%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time19%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
5%BTTS in both halves13%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
16%Scored in both halves13%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
60%BTTS - last 540%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Carolina Core is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.88 pts / match - Inter Miami II

Carolina Core - half-time state
21% leading32% draw47% trailing
Inter Miami II - half-time state
19% leading31% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)0.88
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.44
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)1
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.44
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
32%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
63%No goal before half-time69%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)0.31
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.44
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1.56
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
1.53Average goals (2nd half)2
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
53%Clean sheet after half-time13%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II
42%No goal after half-time56%
Carolina CoreInter Miami II

Carolina Core - second-half results

32% W42% R26% P
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter Miami II - second-half results

0% W31% R69% P
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Carolina Core - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
8
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Carolina CoreLigaInter Miami II
Average goals in match 2.843.22 3.44
Both teams scored 68%61% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%65% 63%
Clean sheets 21%22% 6%
Goal before half-time 84%75% 81%
Goal after half-time 79%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.22
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Zidane CadetOff: Matías Damián Acevedo
  2. Carolina CoreGoalNicholas Kaloukian
  3. Inter Miami IIYellow cardMatias Marin
  4. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Nolan EversOff: Rashid Tetteh
  5. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Samuel BasabeOff: Zidane Cadet
  6. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Nelson MartinezOff: Ryan Baer
  7. Carolina CoreGoalDavid DiazAssist: Nicholas Kaloukian
  8. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Joseph ConversOff: Matteo De Paula
  9. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Khalid BalogunOff: Arnaud Tattevin
  10. Carolina CoreAssistRicardo Montenegro
  11. Inter Miami IIYellow cardNicholas Almeida

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Carolina Core 1 - 3 - 1 Inter Miami II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Inter Miami II
0 : 0
Carolina Core
Carolina Core
1 : 1
Inter Miami II
Carolina Core FC
1 : 2
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 2
Carolina Core FC
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 1
Carolina Core FC

FAQ

What was the result of Carolina Core vs Inter Miami II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 4:0 Inter Miami II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Carolina Core and Inter Miami II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Carolina Core won 1, Inter Miami II won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs Inter Miami II?

Carolina Core score 1.16 goals per game on average and Inter Miami II 0.88. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Carolina Core's matches and 63% of Inter Miami II's.

What form are Carolina Core and Inter Miami II in?

Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Inter Miami II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs Inter Miami II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.