United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 18 October 2026

Carolina Core vs New England II: match statistics

Carolina Core crest
Carolina Core
2 : 2half-time 0:0
New England II crest
New England II

Carolina Core vs New England II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Carolina Core played New England II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Carolina Core: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. New England II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Carolina Core scores 1.40 and concedes 1.92 goals per match. New England II scores 1.64 and concedes 1.52. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Carolina Core 68%, New England II 68%. Over 2.5: Carolina Core 64%, New England II 72%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

New England II has higher xG: 1.86 vs 1.51. Carolina Core: 12.6 shots per match, New England II: 15.6.

Match halves

Carolina Core: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.84. New England II: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Carolina Core: 31-45+ (9 goals). New England II: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New England II sit 11th, while Carolina Core are only 25th. The teams’ overall season records stand at 11 wins and 8 defeats for the visitors, compared with 5 wins and 12 losses for the hosts. Away from home, New England II average 1.73 goals per match, more than Carolina Core manage at home (1.62), and they also create better chances, with average xG of 1.84 versus 1.66. The visitors are more solid out of possession as well, allowing opponents an xG of 1.29, compared with Carolina Core’s 1.64, while conceding an average of 1.46 goals at home. Both teams are in poor recent form — the hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors have lost as many as 4 — but New England II’s edge in chance quality, shots on target (5.45 to 4.92), and away results points to a narrow victory. Carolina Core have scored in every home match this season, so an open game appears more likely than a clean-sheet win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: Carolina Core have recorded BTTS in 64% of their matches, while New England II have done so in 73%, compared with the league average of 62%. In their last five matches, the hosts recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, while the visitors did so in as many as 100%, with both teams averaging 1.8 goals scored per game. Both defenses are currently particularly vulnerable, as Carolina Core have conceded an average of 3.2 goals in their last five outings, compared with 3.0 for New England II. Both sides are also creating enough chances, with average xG figures of 1.70 for the hosts and 2.22 for the visitors over this recent run. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that both teams score at least once.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly points toward goals: Carolina Core averages 1.57 goals scored, while New England II averages 1.73, with the hosts conceding 1.64 goals per match. Both teams regularly create chances, as their average xG stands at 1.87 for Carolina and 1.84 for New England, while each side records more than 15 shots and around 5.5 shots on target per game. In their last five matches, both teams scored 1.8 goals per game, but Carolina conceded as many as 3.2 goals per match and New England 3.0. At least three goals were scored in 80% of Carolina’s last five matches and in all five of New England’s last five games, while both teams found the net in 80% and 100% of those matches, respectively. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as this line has been covered in 86% of the hosts’ matches and 73% of the visitors’ games this season, while their current defensive form further reduces the likelihood of a low-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

New England II have a slight advantage over the course of the season: they win 45% of their matches compared with 43% for Carolina Core, scoring an average of 1.73 goals and conceding 1.36, while the hosts average 1.57 goals scored and 1.64 conceded. The opening phase is particularly significant, as Carolina were trailing at the break in 50% of their matches and had conceded an average of 1.4 goals before half-time in their last five games. In their last five appearances, the visitors scored an average of 1.2 goals in the first 45 minutes, whereas their opponents managed only 0.8, reinforcing the scenario of New England II taking a lead at the break. After half-time, the away side still have solid defensive numbers, conceding an average of just 0.64 goals over the season while scoring 1.00, so they should be well placed to maintain their advantage. Although the two teams have similar xG figures—1.87 for Carolina and 1.84 for New England II—the hosts’ weaker defence and their run of three defeats in their last five matches support the 2/2 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Carolina CoreNew England II
11Shots13
Carolina CoreNew England II
4Shots on target5
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.39xG1.65
Carolina CoreNew England II
6Corners2
Carolina CoreNew England II
56Dangerous attacks66
Carolina CoreNew England II
14Fouls19
Carolina CoreNew England II
1Cards2
Carolina CoreNew England II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Carolina CoreNew England II
1.4Goals scored / match1.64
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.92Goals conceded / match1.52
Carolina CoreNew England II
47%Average possession52%
Carolina CoreNew England II
4.56Shots on target / match5.6
Carolina CoreNew England II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.64Shots per match15.6
Carolina CoreNew England II
4.56Shots on target5.6
Carolina CoreNew England II
11.1%Shot conversion10.5%
Carolina CoreNew England II
47%Possession52%
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.51xG for1.86
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.71xG against1.28
Carolina CoreNew England II

Shooting quality

Carolina Core: BalancedNew England II: Attacking
Carolina CoreNew England II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Carolina Core is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Carolina Core · 0.6 pts / match - New England II

Carolina Core
LDWLL
Season result split
20% W32% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-12
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
New England II
WLLLL
Season result split
44% W24% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-6-8
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 2.22Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New England II is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.64 goals / match - New England II

New England II is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.92 goals / match - Carolina Core · 1.52 goals / match - New England II

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while New England II keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

New England II scoring profile: very strong

New England II scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

35Goals scored (season)41
Carolina CoreNew England II
48Goals conceded (season)38
Carolina CoreNew England II
3.32Average goals in match3.16
Carolina CoreNew England II
9Goals scored (last 5)9
Carolina CoreNew England II
16Goals conceded (last 5)15
Carolina CoreNew England II

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal88%
Carolina CoreNew England II
44%2 goals52%
Carolina CoreNew England II
8%3 goals20%
Carolina CoreNew England II
4%4 goals4%
Carolina CoreNew England II

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal72%
Carolina CoreNew England II
56%2 goals48%
Carolina CoreNew England II
40%3 goals16%
Carolina CoreNew England II
12%4 goals16%
Carolina CoreNew England II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time28%
Carolina CoreNew England II
4%BTTS in both halves12%
Carolina CoreNew England II
20%Scored in both halves32%
Carolina CoreNew England II

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Carolina CoreNew England II
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Carolina CoreNew England II
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Carolina CoreNew England II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Carolina CoreNew England II
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Carolina CoreNew England II
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Carolina CoreNew England II

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Carolina CoreNew England II
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Carolina CoreNew England II
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
Carolina CoreNew England II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New England II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Carolina Core · 1.16 pts / match - New England II

Carolina Core - half-time state
24% leading28% draw48% trailing
New England II - half-time state
28% leading32% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.16
Carolina CoreNew England II
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.76
Carolina CoreNew England II
0.96Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.6
Carolina CoreNew England II
36%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Carolina CoreNew England II
60%No goal before half-time48%
Carolina CoreNew England II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)1.6
Carolina CoreNew England II
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Carolina CoreNew England II
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
Carolina CoreNew England II
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Carolina CoreNew England II
52%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Carolina CoreNew England II
36%No goal after half-time32%
Carolina CoreNew England II

Carolina Core - second-half results

32% W36% D32% L
25
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

New England II - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
29
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Carolina Core - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.41.8
Average goals in match2.22.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
New England II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.61.4
Average goals in match2.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
2
9
16-30
9
9
31-45
8
8
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

New England II
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
10
16-30
9
7
31-45
8
3
46-60
6
6
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-69%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

New England II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.96
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Carolina CoreLigaNew England II
Average goals in match• 3.323.33▼ 3.16
Both teams scored▲ 68%62%▲ 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 64%66%▲ 72%
Clean sheets▲ 24%21%▲ 28%
Goal before half-time▲ 84%77%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%85%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. New England IIYellow cardCristiano Oliveira
  2. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: David DiazOff: Arnaud Tattevin
  3. Carolina CoreSubstitutionOn: Nolan EversOff: Rashid Tetteh
  4. New England IISubstitutionOn: Shuma SasakiOff: Makai Wells
  5. Carolina CoreYellow cardRyan Baer
  6. New England IISubstitutionOn: Aarin PrajapatiOff: Cristiano Oliveira
  7. New England IIGoalMarcos Zambrano-Delgado
  8. New England IIGoalMarcos Zambrano-DelgadoAssist: Javaun Mussenden
  9. New England IIYellow cardShuma Sasaki

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Carolina Core 1 - 0 - 0 New England II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Carolina Core FC
1 : 0
New England Revolution II

FAQ

What was the result of Carolina Core vs New England II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Carolina Core 2:2 New England II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Carolina Core vs New England II?

Carolina Core score 1.40 goals per game on average and New England II 1.64. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Carolina Core's matches and 68% of New England II's.

What form are Carolina Core and New England II in?

Over the last 5 games Carolina Core have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and New England II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Carolina Core vs New England II?

The statistical background for Carolina Core vs New England II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.