Portugal - Liga NOSEstádio Pina ManiqueData current as of 23 October 2026

Casa Pia vs Porto: match statistics

Casa Pia crest
Casa Pia
1 : 4half-time 1:1
Porto crest
Porto

Casa Pia vs Porto: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Casa Pia played Porto in Liga NOS (Portugal). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Venue: Estádio Pina Manique. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Casa Pia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Porto: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Casa Pia scores 0.00 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Porto scores 2.20 and concedes 0.20. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Casa Pia 0%, Porto 20%. Over 2.5: Casa Pia 20%, Porto 40%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Porto has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.07. Casa Pia: 9.2 shots per match, Porto: 14.8.

Match halves

Casa Pia: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Porto: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Casa Pia: 0-15 (0 goals). Porto: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga Portugal: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Porto enter the match as league leaders with a perfect record of 5 wins, a goal difference of 11:1, and a five-match winning streak. Casa Pia have failed to win any of their five matches, scoring 0 goals, conceding 11, and averaging just 0.2 points per game. At home, the hosts have lost both matches played so far, failed to score, concede an average of 4 goals, and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Porto have won 100% of their away matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals, conceding none, and allowing opponents an xG of 0.98 while recording an xG of 1.23 themselves. The difference in finishing efficiency is clear: the visitors convert 26% of their shots, whereas Casa Pia have failed to convert any chance into a goal, making Porto the clear favourites.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Casa Pia have failed to score in their last 5 matches, while conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game during that period. Porto have won their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.2 goals and allowing opponents just 0.2 goals per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches so far, while their share of matches featuring goals from both teams stands at 0%, compared with 40% for the league as a whole. The quality of chances also favors Porto: their average xG against is 0.98, while Casa Pia produced just 1.07 xG in their last five matches and failed to convert it into a single goal. A scenario in which one team—above all the hosts—fails to score is therefore clearly the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Casa Pia have failed to score in their last 5 matches, conceding 11 goals, while Porto have scored 11 and allowed their opponents just 1 goal. The difference in quality is also reflected in xG: Porto created an average of 1.74 xG per match, compared with just 1.07 for Casa Pia, while the visitors’ defense allowed only 0.92 xG. Casa Pia’s matches went Over 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five appearances, compared with 40% for Porto, while neither team recorded a match above 3.5 goals in the season data. Porto should control the game thanks to their significantly stronger defense, but the hosts’ poor finishing limits the chances of an open, four-goal contest. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.40 goals leaves a clear margin below this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Porto are in significantly stronger current form: they have won their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.2 goals and conceding just 0.2, while Casa Pia have failed to win any of their last five fixtures, averaging 0.0 goals scored and 2.2 conceded per match. The visitors were leading at the break in 60% of those appearances and never went into half-time behind, whereas the hosts were trailing after 45 minutes in 60% of their matches and failed to score a single first-half goal. In their last five first halves, Porto averaged 1.4 goals scored and just 0.2 conceded, while Casa Pia conceded an average of 1.0 goal before the break during this period. Season-long data also supports the visitors’ advantage: Porto kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches and were leading at half-time in 2 of 2 games, scoring an average of 2.0 goals before the interval. Therefore, the most likely outcome is Porto leading at half-time and maintaining their victory through to the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Casa PiaPorto
15Shots17
Casa PiaPorto
5Shots on target4
Casa PiaPorto
1.58xG1.63
Casa PiaPorto
5Corners10
Casa PiaPorto
40Dangerous attacks38
Casa PiaPorto
13Fouls10
Casa PiaPorto
4Cards1
Casa PiaPorto

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match2.2
Casa PiaPorto
2.2Goals conceded / match0.2
Casa PiaPorto
46%Average possession54%
Casa PiaPorto
2.2Shots on target / match6.4
Casa PiaPorto

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.2Shots per match14.8
Casa PiaPorto
2.2Shots on target6.4
Casa PiaPorto
0%Shot conversion14.9%
Casa PiaPorto
46%Possession54%
Casa PiaPorto
1.07xG for1.75
Casa PiaPorto
1.77xG against0.92
Casa PiaPorto

Shooting quality

Casa Pia: BalancedPorto: Attacking
Casa PiaPorto
Accuracy (shots on target)24%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Porto is 1400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Casa Pia · 3 pts / match - Porto

Casa Pia
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W20% D80% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Porto
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Porto is 1000% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.2 goals / match - Casa Pia · 0.2 goals / match - Porto

Casa Pia scoring profile: more difficult

Casa Pia scores in 0% of matches (0 of 5 matches), while Porto keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).

Porto scoring profile: very strong

Porto scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Casa Pia keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

0Goals scored (season)11
Casa PiaPorto
11Goals conceded (season)1
Casa PiaPorto
2.2Average goals in match2.4
Casa PiaPorto
0Goals scored (last 5)11
Casa PiaPorto
11Goals conceded (last 5)1
Casa PiaPorto

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
Casa PiaPorto
0%2 goals100%
Casa PiaPorto
0%3 goals20%
Casa PiaPorto
0%4 goals0%
Casa PiaPorto

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal20%
Casa PiaPorto
40%2 goals0%
Casa PiaPorto
20%3 goals0%
Casa PiaPorto
20%4 goals0%
Casa PiaPorto

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Casa PiaPorto
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Casa PiaPorto
0%Scored in both halves40%
Casa PiaPorto

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Casa PiaPorto
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Casa PiaPorto
0%BTTS - last 520%
Casa PiaPorto

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Casa PiaPorto
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Casa PiaPorto
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Casa PiaPorto

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Casa PiaPorto
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Casa PiaPorto
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Casa PiaPorto

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Porto is 450% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Casa Pia · 2.2 pts / match - Porto

Casa Pia - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
Porto - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)2.2
Casa PiaPorto
0Goals scored (1st half)1.4
Casa PiaPorto
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Casa PiaPorto
1Average goals (1st half)1.6
Casa PiaPorto
40%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Casa PiaPorto
100%No goal before half-time20%
Casa PiaPorto

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per match (2nd half)2.2
Casa PiaPorto
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Casa PiaPorto
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Casa PiaPorto
1.2Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Casa PiaPorto
60%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Casa PiaPorto
100%No goal after half-time40%
Casa PiaPorto

Casa Pia - second-half results

0% W60% D40% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Porto - second-half results

60% W40% D0% L
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Casa Pia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Porto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Casa Pia
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Porto
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.1 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
10%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Casa Pia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Porto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
16%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga Portugal).

Teams vs league

Casa PiaLigaPorto
Average goals in match▼ 2.202.67▼ 2.40
Both teams scored▼ 0%42%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 20%53%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▼ 20%32%▲ 80%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%73%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 40%71%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PortoYellow cardJakub Piotr Kiwior
  2. Casa PiaYellow cardAndré Geraldes de Barros
  3. Casa PiaSubstitutionOn: Evans Fabrice MaurinOff: Benjamin Pauwels
  4. PortoSubstitutionOn: Alan VarelaOff: In-Beom Hwang
  5. Casa PiaYellow cardDavid Sousa Albino
  6. Casa PiaSubstitutionOn: Aymen ZouinOff: João Pedro Seno Luis Rêgo
  7. Casa PiaYellow cardIvan Mandić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Casa Pia 1 - 0 - 1 Porto. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Casa Pia AC
2 : 1
FC Porto
FC Porto
4 : 0
Casa Pia AC

FAQ

What was the result of Casa Pia vs Porto?

The Liga NOS match finished Casa Pia 1:4 Porto. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Casa Pia and Porto?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Casa Pia won 1, Porto won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Casa Pia vs Porto?

Casa Pia score 0.00 goals per game on average and Porto 2.20. The Liga NOS average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Casa Pia's matches and 20% of Porto's.

What form are Casa Pia and Porto in?

Over the last 5 games Casa Pia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Porto 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Casa Pia vs Porto?

The statistical background for Casa Pia vs Porto — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.