Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of 06 September 2026

Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: match statistics

Cavese crest
Cavese
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Audace Cerignola crest
Audace Cerignola
130%(2.53)
X28%(3.08)
242%(2.55)

Audace Cerignola displays clearly superior form and efficiency this season. The visitors hold a 43% win rate away with only 29% losses, while Cavese wins just 29% of home matches and loses 36%. Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors – Audace earned 2.0 points per match (3 wins) compared to 1.2 points for Cavese (only 1 win). Cavese fails to score in 29% of home games, and their home goal difference stands at 0, indicating offensive struggles. Audace Cerignola possesses better xG statistics (1.36 vs 1.42 for Cavese), but most importantly, a significantly higher point efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, I predict a victory for the visitors, although low xG values and similar possession statistics suggest this could be a close encounter with the possibility of a draw.

Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cavese played Audace Cerignola in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Cavese: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Audace Cerignola: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cavese scores 0.93 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Audace Cerignola scores 1.21 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cavese 43%, Audace Cerignola 46%. Over 2.5: Cavese 39%, Audace Cerignola 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Audace Cerignola has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.36. Cavese: 10.7 shots per match, Audace Cerignola: 12.8.

Match halves

Cavese: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.57. Audace Cerignola: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Cavese: 61-75 (7 goals). Audace Cerignola: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Audace Cerignola displays clearly superior form and efficiency this season. The visitors hold a 43% win rate away with only 29% losses, while Cavese wins just 29% of home matches and loses 36%. Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors – Audace earned 2.0 points per match (3 wins) compared to 1.2 points for Cavese (only 1 win). Cavese fails to score in 29% of home games, and their home goal difference stands at 0, indicating offensive struggles. Audace Cerignola possesses better xG statistics (1.36 vs 1.42 for Cavese), but most importantly, a significantly higher point efficiency. Taking all statistical data into account, I predict a victory for the visitors, although low xG values and similar possession statistics suggest this could be a close encounter with the possibility of a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
CaveseAudace Cerignola
7Shots6
CaveseAudace Cerignola
3Shots on target3
CaveseAudace Cerignola
1.25xG1.13
CaveseAudace Cerignola
6Corners3
CaveseAudace Cerignola
82Dangerous attacks74
CaveseAudace Cerignola
22Fouls13
CaveseAudace Cerignola
2Cards2
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.93Goals scored / match1.21
CaveseAudace Cerignola
1.21Goals conceded / match1.21
CaveseAudace Cerignola
47%Average possession47%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
3.5Shots on target / match4.5
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.68Shots per match12.79
CaveseAudace Cerignola
3.5Shots on target4.5
CaveseAudace Cerignola
8.7%Shot conversion9.5%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
47%Possession47%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
1.36xG for1.49
CaveseAudace Cerignola
1.31xG against1.3
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Shooting quality

Cavese: BalancedAudace Cerignola: Balanced
CaveseAudace Cerignola
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Audace Cerignola is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Cavese · 2 pts / match - Audace Cerignola

Cavese
DDWDL
Season result split
21% W36% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-12
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Audace Cerignola
WWDLW
Season result split
39% W32% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-8
1.50 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Audace Cerignola is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - Cavese · 1.21 goals / match - Audace Cerignola

Cavese scoring profile: mixed

Cavese scores in 61% of matches (17 of 28 matches), while Audace Cerignola keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).

Audace Cerignola scoring profile: strong

Audace Cerignola scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Cavese keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

26Goals scored (season)34
CaveseAudace Cerignola
34Goals conceded (season)34
CaveseAudace Cerignola
2.14Average goals in match2.43
CaveseAudace Cerignola
3Goals scored (last 5)6
CaveseAudace Cerignola
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
CaveseAudace Cerignola

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal68%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
25%2 goals36%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
7%3 goals14%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0%4 goals4%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal61%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
43%2 goals36%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
11%3 goals18%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0%4 goals7%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
Audace Cerignola - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 28 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time21%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0%BTTS in both halves4%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
14%Scored in both halves25%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
40%BTTS - last 540%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavese is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Cavese · 1.18 pts / match - Audace Cerignola

Cavese - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Audace Cerignola - half-time state
21% leading54% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.18
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.46
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.71Average goals (1st half)1
CaveseAudace Cerignola
71%Clean sheet before half-time61%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
71%No goal before half-time57%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.43
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
CaveseAudace Cerignola
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
CaveseAudace Cerignola
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.43
CaveseAudace Cerignola
46%Clean sheet after half-time54%
CaveseAudace Cerignola
54%No goal after half-time50%
CaveseAudace Cerignola

Cavese - second-half results

25% W39% R36% P
35
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Audace Cerignola - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cavese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Audace Cerignola - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cavese
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
5
7
46-60
7
6
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Audace Cerignola
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
6
16-30
6
5
31-45
8
4
46-60
4
6
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cavese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Audace Cerignola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

CaveseLigaAudace Cerignola
Average goals in match 2.142.48 2.43
Both teams scored 43%49% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%48% 50%
Clean sheets 32%30% 39%
Goal before half-time 54%65% 61%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CaveseYellow cardMattia Macchi
  2. CaveseGoalDavide Munari
  3. Audace CerignolaYellow cardGaetano Vitale
  4. Audace CerignolaSubstitutionOn: Ernesto BallabileOff: Claudio Parlato
  5. CaveseGoalMattia MacchiAssist: Gerardo Fusco
  6. CaveseYellow cardMarlon Ubani
  7. Audace CerignolaYellow cardErnesto Ballabile
  8. CaveseSubstitutionOn: Elios MinajOff: Gerardo Fusco

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cavese 1 - 0 - 0 Audace Cerignola. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Audace Cerignola
1 : 3
Cavese

FAQ

What was the result of Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?

The Serie C Group C match finished Cavese 2:0 Audace Cerignola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?

Cavese score 0.93 goals per game on average and Audace Cerignola 1.21. The Serie C Group C average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Cavese's matches and 46% of Audace Cerignola's.

What form are Cavese and Audace Cerignola in?

Over the last 5 games Cavese have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Audace Cerignola 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cavese vs Audace Cerignola?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Cavese vs Audace Cerignola: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.