CD Eldense vs Cádiz: match statistics
CD Eldense vs Cádiz: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CD Eldense played Cádiz in Segunda División (Spain). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Venue: Nuevo Pepico Amat. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
CD Eldense: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Cádiz: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
CD Eldense scores 0.00 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Cádiz scores 0.00 and concedes 0.00. League average: 2.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CD Eldense 0%, Cádiz 0%. Over 2.5: CD Eldense 100%, Cádiz 0%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Cádiz has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.20. CD Eldense: 11.0 shots per match, Cádiz: 17.0.
Match halves
CD Eldense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Cádiz: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
CD Eldense: 0-15 (0 goals). Cádiz: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Segunda División: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cádiz sit 10th in the table, while CD Eldense are only 21st, indicating a clear difference in the teams’ respective positions so far. In their last five matches, the hosts have conceded as many as 12 goals—an average of 2.4 per game—while scoring just 4. The visitors have also managed only 3 goals in five matches, but their defence has conceded just 5, which is 7 fewer than Eldense. Both teams have won one of their last five matches and averaged 0.8 points, making a draw a realistic outcome. However, Eldense’s weak defence, having lost their opening match of the season 0:3, gives Cádiz a greater chance of securing the win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to a scenario in which at least one team fails to score, as BTTS has occurred in only 40% of Eldense’s last five matches and in just 20% of Cádiz’s games. Both teams also have limited attacking efficiency: Eldense average 0.8 goals, while Cádiz average 0.6 goals across their last five appearances. The visitors’ particularly low attacking potential is further supported by an xG of 0.84, while their defence restricts opponents to just 0.79 xG and concedes an average of 1.0 goal per match. Eldense do concede as many as 2.4 goals per game, but Cádiz’s weak attacking output increases the risk that the visitors will be the team to draw a blank. BTTS occurs in 45% of league matches, meaning the current figures for both teams clearly support a “BTTS - No” pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data from the last 5 matches points to limited attacking potential from both teams: Eldense averaged 0.8 goals, while Cádiz averaged 0.6. Their average xG stands at 1.25 and 0.84 respectively, which, when combined with the opponents’ xG conceded figures of 0.79 for Cádiz and 1.38 for Eldense, produces a projected total of around 2.10 goals. Eldense did concede 12 goals across five matches, but Cádiz scored only 3 goals over the same period and had at least three goals in just 20% of their matches. Therefore, the clearest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals, as even the hosts’ defensive weaknesses are unlikely to overcome the visitors’ limited attacking profile and create a four-goal game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Cádiz leading at the break, as Eldense have been behind at half-time in each of their last five matches, failing to score a single goal during that period while conceding an average of 3.0. Before the break, Cádiz have averaged 0.4 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded, while keeping a clean sheet in this phase of the game in 80% of their recent matches. Across their last five overall appearances, Eldense have allowed opponents an average of 2.4 goals per match, clearly more than Cádiz, who have conceded 1.0. The hosts have won only 20% of these matches and lost 60%, a figure matched by the visitors, but Eldense’s weak defence and highly negative first-half record favour the 2/2 scenario. A draw at half-time followed by a Cádiz win remains a significant alternative, as the visitors have been level at the break in 60% of their recent matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CD Eldense | Cádiz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 18% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CD Eldense scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Cádiz keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).
Cádiz scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while CD Eldense keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Eldense
Over / Under - Cádiz
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Eldense - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Cádiz - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 3.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 100% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CD Eldense
Cádiz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| CD Eldense | Liga | Cádiz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.33 | ▼ 0.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 47% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 47% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 37% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 0% | 60% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CD EldenseGoalGuillermo Macho Muñoz
- CD EldenseYellow cardMariano Emilio Carmona Cerezo
- CD EldenseSubstitutionOn: Rodrigo Val PuertolasOff: Guillermo Macho Muñoz
- CD EldenseYellow cardAlex Serradell Garralaga
FAQ
What was the result of CD Eldense vs Cádiz?
The Segunda División match finished CD Eldense 2:2 Cádiz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Eldense vs Cádiz?
CD Eldense score 0.00 goals per game on average and Cádiz 0.00. The Segunda División average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 0% of CD Eldense's matches and 0% of Cádiz's.
What form are CD Eldense and Cádiz in?
Over the last 5 games CD Eldense have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Cádiz 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Eldense vs Cádiz?
The statistical background for CD Eldense vs Cádiz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


