Portugal - Liga 3Estádio Municipal de MafraData current as of 03 November 2026

CD Mafra vs Louletano: match statistics

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Louletano crest
Louletano

CD Mafra vs Louletano: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Mafra played Louletano in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Venue: Estádio Municipal de Mafra. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

CD Mafra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Louletano: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 2.00 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Louletano scores 1.29 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 71%, Louletano 57%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 71%, Louletano 57%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.24. CD Mafra: 9.6 shots per match, Louletano: 8.1.

Match halves

CD Mafra: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.29. Louletano: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 61-75 (5 goals). Louletano: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.63 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Mafra are favourites based on their home record: they have won 67% of these matches and have not lost any, while Louletano have won 33% of their away games. The hosts score an average of 2.67 goals at home, compared with 1.33 for Louletano away, and their average xG is 1.57 versus Louletano’s 1.23. Mafra also have the defensive edge: they concede an average of 0.67 goals at home and allow opponents an xG of 0.86, while Louletano concede 1 goal away, with their opponents recording an xG of 1.29. Both teams have won only once in their last five matches, but Mafra have scored 11 goals to Louletano’s 5; however, the hosts’ three draws and 11 goals conceded over that spell warrant caution.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Mafra saw both teams score in 75% of their matches this season and in all of their last 5 games, scoring and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per match over that run. Louletano have a lower season-long rate of such matches, at 33%, but this has risen to 60% across their last 5 games, during which they conceded an average of 1.4 goals. The hosts’ chances of scoring are supported by their average xG of 1.70 over their last 5 matches, while Louletano face a Mafra defence that has conceded an average of 1.75 goals per game this season. A key risk for this pick is that Louletano have failed to score in 67% of their league matches, although their average xG of 1.23 suggests they have the potential to create chances. The recent scoring trends of both teams outweigh this risk, supporting the pick that both teams will score at least once (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, CD Mafra scored and conceded an average of 2.2 goals each, with at least 3 goals in every game. Louletano’s results were more subdued, averaging 1.0 goal scored and 1.4 conceded, which reduces confidence in higher lines. The hosts average 1.25 xG, while the visitors average 1.23; Mafra also allows opponents chances worth 1.53 xG per match. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the best pick: Mafra’s recent scoring form supports this outcome, and the line does not require Louletano to match their attacking tempo.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a CD Mafra win: at home, the hosts were level at the break in 2 of 4 matches and did not trail at half-time in any of them. Their recent form points to a decisive second half: across their last 5 matches, they averaged 1.8 goals after the break and won that period 4 times, while Louletano averaged 0.4 goals in the second half. However, this pick carries clear risk, as CD Mafra were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches, irrespective of venue, so turnaround scenarios also have a significant chance. In addition, the visitors concede an average of 1.0 goal per match, compared with 1.75 for the hosts, so CD Mafra’s advantage is not secure enough to strongly favor them to lead at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

68Possession (%)32
CD MafraLouletano
5Shots1
CD MafraLouletano
5Shots on target1
CD MafraLouletano
1.48xG0.4
CD MafraLouletano
7Corners3
CD MafraLouletano
110Dangerous attacks35
CD MafraLouletano
11Fouls3
CD MafraLouletano
0Cards0
CD MafraLouletano

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.29
CD MafraLouletano
1.43Goals conceded / match1.43
CD MafraLouletano
52%Average possession40%
CD MafraLouletano
4.29Shots on target / match4.29
CD MafraLouletano

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.57Shots per match8.14
CD MafraLouletano
4.29Shots on target4.29
CD MafraLouletano
20.9%Shot conversion15.8%
CD MafraLouletano
52%Possession40%
CD MafraLouletano
1.37xG for1.24
CD MafraLouletano
0.97xG against1.43
CD MafraLouletano

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingLouletano: Counter-attacking
CD MafraLouletano
Accuracy (shots on target)45%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Louletano is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.4 pts / match - Louletano

CD Mafra
LWLDD
Season result split
29% W43% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-2
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Louletano
WWLLD
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - CD Mafra · 1.29 goals / match - Louletano

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Louletano keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Louletano scoring profile: strong

Louletano scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

14Goals scored (season)9
CD MafraLouletano
10Goals conceded (season)10
CD MafraLouletano
3.43Average goals in match2.71
CD MafraLouletano
8Goals scored (last 5)8
CD MafraLouletano
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD MafraLouletano

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal71%
CD MafraLouletano
43%2 goals29%
CD MafraLouletano
29%3 goals14%
CD MafraLouletano
14%4 goals14%
CD MafraLouletano

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
CD MafraLouletano
57%2 goals57%
CD MafraLouletano
14%3 goals14%
CD MafraLouletano
0%4 goals0%
CD MafraLouletano

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
CD MafraLouletano
0%BTTS in both halves14%
CD MafraLouletano
14%Scored in both halves29%
CD MafraLouletano

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
CD MafraLouletano
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CD MafraLouletano
80%BTTS - last 560%
CD MafraLouletano

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
CD MafraLouletano
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
CD MafraLouletano
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD MafraLouletano

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
CD MafraLouletano
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
CD MafraLouletano
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
CD MafraLouletano

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Louletano is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.71 pts / match - Louletano

CD Mafra - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
Louletano - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.71
CD MafraLouletano
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.57
CD MafraLouletano
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
CD MafraLouletano
1.57Average goals (1st half)0.86
CD MafraLouletano
29%Clean sheet before half-time71%
CD MafraLouletano
57%No goal before half-time43%
CD MafraLouletano

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.29
CD MafraLouletano
1.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
CD MafraLouletano
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.14
CD MafraLouletano
1.86Average goals (2nd half)1.86
CD MafraLouletano
43%Clean sheet after half-time43%
CD MafraLouletano
29%No goal after half-time57%
CD MafraLouletano

CD Mafra - second-half results

57% W29% D14% L
6
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Louletano - second-half results

29% W43% D29% L
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Louletano - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
5
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Louletano
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Louletano

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaLouletano
Average goals in match▲ 3.432.63• 2.71
Both teams scored▲ 71%52%▲ 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 71%52%▲ 57%
Clean sheets• 29%30%• 29%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%70%• 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 86%70%• 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LouletanoGoalLuca van der Gaag
  2. CD MafraGoalMamor Niang

FAQ

What was the result of CD Mafra vs Louletano?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 2:1 Louletano. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs Louletano?

CD Mafra score 2.00 goals per game on average and Louletano 1.29. The Liga 3 average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 71% of CD Mafra's matches and 57% of Louletano's.

What form are CD Mafra and Louletano in?

Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Louletano 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs Louletano?

The statistical background for CD Mafra vs Louletano — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.