Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 12 September 2026

CD Mafra vs Varzim: match statistics

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Varzim crest
Varzim
155%(2.20)
X28%(3.10)
217%(3.01)

CD Mafra displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and just 0% losses at their own stadium, making them a very threatening opponent at home. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per home match while conceding only 0.56, and their home goal difference of +10 is significantly better than Varzim's away goal difference (+1). Varzim has weaker offensive statistics away from home (1.22 goals/match) and concedes an average of 1.11 goals, additionally failing to keep a clean sheet in 78% of away matches. Mafra has better shot accuracy (17% vs 15%) and more shots on target in home matches (4.67 vs Varzim's 2.89 away). Both teams are in good recent form, but the home advantage and Mafra's decidedly better home statistics point to a home win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' solidity.

CD Mafra vs Varzim: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Mafra played Varzim in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 15 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CD Mafra: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Varzim: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 1.56 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Varzim scores 1.47 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 67%, Varzim 58%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 44%, Varzim 47%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.32. CD Mafra: 9.7 shots per match, Varzim: 10.0.

Match halves

CD Mafra: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.94. Varzim: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 61-75 (6 goals). Varzim: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.16 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Mafra displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and just 0% losses at their own stadium, making them a very threatening opponent at home. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per home match while conceding only 0.56, and their home goal difference of +10 is significantly better than Varzim's away goal difference (+1). Varzim has weaker offensive statistics away from home (1.22 goals/match) and concedes an average of 1.11 goals, additionally failing to keep a clean sheet in 78% of away matches. Mafra has better shot accuracy (17% vs 15%) and more shots on target in home matches (4.67 vs Varzim's 2.89 away). Both teams are in good recent form, but the home advantage and Mafra's decidedly better home statistics point to a home win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' solidity.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CD MafraVarzim
12Shots4
CD MafraVarzim
4Shots on target1
CD MafraVarzim
1.48xG0.59
CD MafraVarzim
6Corners3
CD MafraVarzim
60Dangerous attacks34
CD MafraVarzim
7Fouls11
CD MafraVarzim
2Cards2
CD MafraVarzim

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.47
CD MafraVarzim
1.06Goals conceded / match0.95
CD MafraVarzim
49%Average possession48%
CD MafraVarzim
4.22Shots on target / match3.84
CD MafraVarzim

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match10
CD MafraVarzim
4.22Shots on target3.84
CD MafraVarzim
16.1%Shot conversion14.7%
CD MafraVarzim
49%Possession48%
CD MafraVarzim
1.35xG for1.32
CD MafraVarzim
1.22xG against1.27
CD MafraVarzim

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingVarzim: Efficient finishing
CD MafraVarzim
Accuracy (shots on target)44%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Varzim is 9% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - CD Mafra · 2.4 pts / match - Varzim

CD Mafra
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W39% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-2
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Varzim
LWWWW
Season result split
42% W37% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-4
1.63 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - CD Mafra · 1.47 goals / match - Varzim

Varzim is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - CD Mafra · 0.95 goals / match - Varzim

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Varzim scoring profile: strong

Varzim scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 matches).

28Goals scored (season)28
CD MafraVarzim
19Goals conceded (season)18
CD MafraVarzim
2.61Average goals in match2.42
CD MafraVarzim
9Goals scored (last 5)9
CD MafraVarzim
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
CD MafraVarzim

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal74%
CD MafraVarzim
44%2 goals47%
CD MafraVarzim
17%3 goals21%
CD MafraVarzim
6%4 goals5%
CD MafraVarzim

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal74%
CD MafraVarzim
22%2 goals16%
CD MafraVarzim
11%3 goals5%
CD MafraVarzim
6%4 goals0%
CD MafraVarzim

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time16%
CD MafraVarzim
11%BTTS in both halves5%
CD MafraVarzim
33%Scored in both halves37%
CD MafraVarzim

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
CD MafraVarzim
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
CD MafraVarzim
80%BTTS - last 560%
CD MafraVarzim

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
CD MafraVarzim
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
CD MafraVarzim
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
CD MafraVarzim

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
CD MafraVarzim
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
CD MafraVarzim
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
CD MafraVarzim

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.47 pts / match - Varzim

CD Mafra - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing
Varzim - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)1.47
CD MafraVarzim
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.68
CD MafraVarzim
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
CD MafraVarzim
1Average goals (1st half)1.11
CD MafraVarzim
67%Clean sheet before half-time58%
CD MafraVarzim
56%No goal before half-time53%
CD MafraVarzim

After half-time (2nd half)

1.61Points per match (2nd half)1.58
CD MafraVarzim
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
CD MafraVarzim
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CD MafraVarzim
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.32
CD MafraVarzim
50%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CD MafraVarzim
22%No goal after half-time37%
CD MafraVarzim

CD Mafra - second-half results

39% W44% D17% L
29
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Varzim - second-half results

37% W47% D16% L
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Varzim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.401.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
3
46-60
6
5
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
8
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
150%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaVarzim
Average goals in match 2.612.16 2.42
Both teams scored 67%46% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%37% 47%
Clean sheets 33%33% 26%
Goal before half-time 61%63% 74%
Goal after half-time 78%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.16
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Mafra vs Varzim?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 1:0 Varzim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs Varzim?

CD Mafra score 1.56 goals per game on average and Varzim 1.47. The Liga 3 average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 67% of CD Mafra's matches and 58% of Varzim's.

What form are CD Mafra and Varzim in?

Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Varzim 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs Varzim?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Mafra vs Varzim: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.