Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

CD Mafra vs Varzim: match statistics

CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Varzim crest
Varzim
155%(2.20)
X28%(3.10)
217%(3.01)

CD Mafra displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and just 0% losses at their own stadium, making them a very threatening opponent at home. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per home match while conceding only 0.56, and their home goal difference of +10 is significantly better than Varzim's away goal difference (+1). Varzim has weaker offensive statistics away from home (1.22 goals/match) and concedes an average of 1.11 goals, additionally failing to keep a clean sheet in 78% of away matches. Mafra has better shot accuracy (17% vs 15%) and more shots on target in home matches (4.67 vs Varzim's 2.89 away). Both teams are in good recent form, but the home advantage and Mafra's decidedly better home statistics point to a home win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' solidity.

CD Mafra vs Varzim: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Mafra play Varzim in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 15 February 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CD Mafra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Varzim: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Mafra scores 1.41 and concedes 1.34 goals per match. Varzim scores 1.22 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Mafra 63%, Varzim 47%. Over 2.5: CD Mafra 47%, Varzim 44%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.28. CD Mafra: 10.3 shots per match, Varzim: 9.8.

Match halves

CD Mafra: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81. Varzim: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). Varzim: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

CD Mafra displays impressive home form with a 67% win rate and just 0% losses at their own stadium, making them a very threatening opponent at home. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals per home match while conceding only 0.56, and their home goal difference of +10 is significantly better than Varzim's away goal difference (+1). Varzim has weaker offensive statistics away from home (1.22 goals/match) and concedes an average of 1.11 goals, additionally failing to keep a clean sheet in 78% of away matches. Mafra has better shot accuracy (17% vs 15%) and more shots on target in home matches (4.67 vs Varzim's 2.89 away). Both teams are in good recent form, but the home advantage and Mafra's decidedly better home statistics point to a home win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to both teams' solidity.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CD MafraVarzim
12Shots4
CD MafraVarzim
4Shots on target1
CD MafraVarzim
1.48xG0.59
CD MafraVarzim
6Corners3
CD MafraVarzim
60Dangerous attacks34
CD MafraVarzim
7Fouls11
CD MafraVarzim
2Cards2
CD MafraVarzim

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.41Goals scored / match1.22
CD MafraVarzim
1.34Goals conceded / match1.13
CD MafraVarzim
50%Average possession49%
CD MafraVarzim
4.5Shots on target / match3.72
CD MafraVarzim

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.28Shots per match9.81
CD MafraVarzim
4.5Shots on target3.72
CD MafraVarzim
13.7%Shot conversion12.4%
CD MafraVarzim
50%Possession49%
CD MafraVarzim
1.41xG for1.28
CD MafraVarzim
1.27xG against1.33
CD MafraVarzim

Shooting quality

CD Mafra: Efficient finishingVarzim: Balanced
CD MafraVarzim
Accuracy (shots on target)44%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Mafra is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1 pts / match - Varzim

CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Varzim
WDLLD
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra · 1.22 goals / match - Varzim

Varzim is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra · 1.13 goals / match - Varzim

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

Varzim scoring profile: strong

Varzim scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

45Goals scored (season)39
CD MafraVarzim
43Goals conceded (season)36
CD MafraVarzim
2.75Average goals in match2.34
CD MafraVarzim
8Goals scored (last 5)6
CD MafraVarzim
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD MafraVarzim

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal66%
CD MafraVarzim
38%2 goals41%
CD MafraVarzim
13%3 goals13%
CD MafraVarzim
3%4 goals3%
CD MafraVarzim

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
CD MafraVarzim
34%2 goals28%
CD MafraVarzim
22%3 goals9%
CD MafraVarzim
9%4 goals0%
CD MafraVarzim

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time19%
CD MafraVarzim
6%BTTS in both halves9%
CD MafraVarzim
28%Scored in both halves28%
CD MafraVarzim

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
CD MafraVarzim
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CD MafraVarzim
60%BTTS - last 560%
CD MafraVarzim

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CD MafraVarzim
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
CD MafraVarzim
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CD MafraVarzim

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
CD MafraVarzim
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
CD MafraVarzim
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
CD MafraVarzim

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra · 1.25 pts / match - Varzim

CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing
Varzim - half-time state
28% leading41% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.25
CD MafraVarzim
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.59
CD MafraVarzim
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
CD MafraVarzim
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.16
CD MafraVarzim
59%Clean sheet before half-time53%
CD MafraVarzim
56%No goal before half-time59%
CD MafraVarzim

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.31
CD MafraVarzim
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
CD MafraVarzim
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
CD MafraVarzim
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.19
CD MafraVarzim
47%Clean sheet after half-time47%
CD MafraVarzim
28%No goal after half-time47%
CD MafraVarzim

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Varzim - second-half results

28% W47% R25% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Varzim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
7
12
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD MafraLigaVarzim
Average goals in match 2.752.23 2.34
Both teams scored 63%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%40% 44%
Clean sheets 31%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 69%
Goal after half-time 81%74% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Mafra 1 - 0 - 0 Varzim. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Mafra vs Varzim?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Mafra 1:0 Varzim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Mafra vs Varzim?

CD Mafra score 1.41 goals per game on average and Varzim 1.22. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 63% of CD Mafra's matches and 47% of Varzim's.

What form are CD Mafra and Varzim in?

Over the last 5 games CD Mafra have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Varzim 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Mafra vs Varzim?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Mafra vs Varzim: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.