El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
135%(2.75)
X35%(3.04)
230%(2.38)

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between both teams. CD Platense has a weaker home form with just 21% wins and as many as 50% draws, suggesting difficulties in breaking down opponents in front of their own fans. Cacahuatique shows a better away record with 47% wins, but their recent form (1 win in 5 matches) raises doubts. A key factor is the very similar average goals scored (1.43 vs 1.47) and conceded (1.36 vs 1.33) along with comparable xG metrics, which confirms the balance of power. The high draw rate for the hosts (50%) along with similar shooting statistics point towards a share of the points. Considering the current poor form of both teams in their last five matches, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense play Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 22:15. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.22 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 57%, Cacahuatique 57%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 41%, Cacahuatique 55%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.24. CD Platense: 8.5 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.9.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.70. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (12 goals). Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between both teams. CD Platense has a weaker home form with just 21% wins and as many as 50% draws, suggesting difficulties in breaking down opponents in front of their own fans. Cacahuatique shows a better away record with 47% wins, but their recent form (1 win in 5 matches) raises doubts. A key factor is the very similar average goals scored (1.43 vs 1.47) and conceded (1.36 vs 1.33) along with comparable xG metrics, which confirms the balance of power. The high draw rate for the hosts (50%) along with similar shooting statistics point towards a share of the points. Considering the current poor form of both teams in their last five matches, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
12Shots11
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
2Shots on target5
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.89xG1.73
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
11Corners2
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
137Dangerous attacks95
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
16Fouls16
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0Cards0
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.22Goals scored / match1.18
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.43Goals conceded / match1.37
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
48%Average possession47%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
3.72Shots on target / match4.27
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.48Shots per match8.88
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
3.72Shots on target4.27
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
14.4%Shot conversion13.3%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
48%Possession47%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.24xG for1.4
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.33xG against1.57
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingCacahuatique: Counter-attacking
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)44%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cacahuatique is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.2 pts / match - Cacahuatique

CD Platense
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W41% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-19-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-11-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-5-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 67% of matches (31 of 46 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 22% (10 of 46 matches).

56Goals scored (season)58
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
66Goals conceded (season)67
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
2.65Average goals in match2.55
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
4Goals scored (last 5)5
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
33%2 goals24%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
17%3 goals12%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
4%4 goals4%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal71%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
35%2 goals41%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
20%3 goals18%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
7%4 goals4%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time12%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
7%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
15%Scored in both halves12%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
40%BTTS - last 560%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.43 pts / match - Cacahuatique

CD Platense - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.43
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.63
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.08
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
52%Clean sheet before half-time69%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
63%No goal before half-time55%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

0.98Points per match (2nd half)1.08
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.47
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
46%Clean sheet after half-time41%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
54%No goal after half-time59%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

CD Platense - second-half results

17% W46% R37% P
52
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
7
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
10
46-60
12
14
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match 2.652.67 2.55
Both teams scored 57%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%50% 55%
Clean sheets 22%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 63%
Goal after half-time 72%78% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): CD Platense 1 - 2 - 0 Cacahuatique. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Cacahuatique
1 : 1
CD Platense
Cacahuatique
1 : 3
CD Platense
CD Platense
1 : 1
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Cacahuatique?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 1, Cacahuatique won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

CD Platense score 1.22 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.18. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of CD Platense's matches and 57% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are CD Platense and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.