El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 22 October 2026

CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique
135%(2.75)
X35%(3.04)
230%(2.38)

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between both teams. CD Platense has a weaker home form with just 21% wins and as many as 50% draws, suggesting difficulties in breaking down opponents in front of their own fans. Cacahuatique shows a better away record with 47% wins, but their recent form (1 win in 5 matches) raises doubts. A key factor is the very similar average goals scored (1.43 vs 1.47) and conceded (1.36 vs 1.33) along with comparable xG metrics, which confirms the balance of power. The high draw rate for the hosts (50%) along with similar shooting statistics point towards a share of the points. Considering the current poor form of both teams in their last five matches, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 8 February 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.24 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.23 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 59%, Cacahuatique 60%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 48%, Cacahuatique 67%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Cacahuatique has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.20. CD Platense: 8.1 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.3.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.66. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 31-45+ (8 goals). Cacahuatique: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between both teams. CD Platense has a weaker home form with just 21% wins and as many as 50% draws, suggesting difficulties in breaking down opponents in front of their own fans. Cacahuatique shows a better away record with 47% wins, but their recent form (1 win in 5 matches) raises doubts. A key factor is the very similar average goals scored (1.43 vs 1.47) and conceded (1.36 vs 1.33) along with comparable xG metrics, which confirms the balance of power. The high draw rate for the hosts (50%) along with similar shooting statistics point towards a share of the points. Considering the current poor form of both teams in their last five matches, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
12Shots11
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
2Shots on target5
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.89xG1.73
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
11Corners2
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
137Dangerous attacks95
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
16Fouls16
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0Cards0
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.24Goals scored / match1.23
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.52Goals conceded / match1.47
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
47%Average possession48%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
3.62Shots on target / match3.8
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.14Shots per match8.33
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
3.62Shots on target3.8
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
15.3%Shot conversion14.8%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
47%Possession48%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.2xG for1.34
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.35xG against1.56
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Counter-attackingCacahuatique: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)44%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cacahuatique is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - CD Platense · 1 pts / match - Cacahuatique

CD Platense
LWLLD
Season result split
21% W41% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-12-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Cacahuatique
WDLDL
Season result split
30% W23% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-2-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: very strong

Cacahuatique scores in 77% of matches (23 of 30 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 matches).

36Goals scored (season)37
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
44Goals conceded (season)44
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
2.76Average goals in match2.7
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
4Goals scored (last 5)5
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal77%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
34%2 goals30%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
21%3 goals10%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
3%4 goals3%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal70%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
38%2 goals50%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
17%3 goals23%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
10%4 goals3%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time20%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
7%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
14%Scored in both halves10%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
40%BTTS - last 580%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cacahuatique is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.37 pts / match - Cacahuatique

CD Platense - half-time state
21% leading52% draw28% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
30% leading47% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.37
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.67
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.17
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
52%Clean sheet before half-time63%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
62%No goal before half-time50%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.13
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.97
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.53
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
45%Clean sheet after half-time43%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique
59%No goal after half-time63%
CD PlatenseCacahuatique

CD Platense - second-half results

14% W52% D34% L
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

30% W23% D47% L
41
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
10
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
3
10
46-60
4
10
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match• 2.762.72• 2.70
Both teams scored▲ 59%56%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 48%53%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 21%27%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 66%68%• 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 69%77%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Alesson Henrique Ferreira⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CacahuatiqueGoalAlesson Henrique Ferreira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ismael Alexander CornejoMatches officiated: 17
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 228%Home wins28%Draws41%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): CD Platense 1 - 1 - 0 Cacahuatique. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Cacahuatique
1 : 3
CD Platense
CD Platense
1 : 1
Cacahuatique

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Cacahuatique?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 1, Cacahuatique won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

CD Platense score 1.24 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.23. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of CD Platense's matches and 60% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are CD Platense and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Cacahuatique?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.