CD Platense vs Firpo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played Firpo in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

CD Platense: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Firpo: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.36 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Firpo scores 2.23 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 64%, Firpo 64%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 50%, Firpo 68%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.24. CD Platense: 8.8 shots per match, Firpo: 11.2.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.82. Firpo: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.41.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 61-75 (7 goals). Firpo: 61-75 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
CD PlatenseFirpo
4Shots10
CD PlatenseFirpo
0Shots on target2
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.74xG1.29
CD PlatenseFirpo
6Corners2
CD PlatenseFirpo
66Dangerous attacks71
CD PlatenseFirpo
14Fouls24
CD PlatenseFirpo
0Cards0
CD PlatenseFirpo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.36Goals scored / match2.23
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.23Goals conceded / match1.18
CD PlatenseFirpo
48%Average possession52%
CD PlatenseFirpo
3.86Shots on target / match5.5
CD PlatenseFirpo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.82Shots per match11.23
CD PlatenseFirpo
3.86Shots on target5.5
CD PlatenseFirpo
15.5%Shot conversion19.8%
CD PlatenseFirpo
48%Possession52%
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.24xG for1.77
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.24xG against1.16
CD PlatenseFirpo

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingFirpo: Efficient finishing
CD PlatenseFirpo
Accuracy (shots on target)44%49%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CD Platense · 2.6 pts / match - Firpo

CD Platense
LDDWL
Season result split
23% W50% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-6
1.18 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-7-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Firpo
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
68% W23% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-2
2.27 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - CD Platense · 2.23 goals / match - Firpo

CD Platense scoring profile: strong

CD Platense scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

30Goals scored (season)49
CD PlatenseFirpo
27Goals conceded (season)26
CD PlatenseFirpo
2.59Average goals in match3.41
CD PlatenseFirpo
6Goals scored (last 5)14
CD PlatenseFirpo
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
CD PlatenseFirpo

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal91%
CD PlatenseFirpo
36%2 goals68%
CD PlatenseFirpo
23%3 goals55%
CD PlatenseFirpo
5%4 goals9%
CD PlatenseFirpo

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal68%
CD PlatenseFirpo
27%2 goals27%
CD PlatenseFirpo
14%3 goals14%
CD PlatenseFirpo
5%4 goals5%
CD PlatenseFirpo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time27%
CD PlatenseFirpo
9%BTTS in both halves14%
CD PlatenseFirpo
18%Scored in both halves50%
CD PlatenseFirpo

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
CD PlatenseFirpo
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CD PlatenseFirpo
40%BTTS - last 5100%
CD PlatenseFirpo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
CD PlatenseFirpo
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
CD PlatenseFirpo
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
CD PlatenseFirpo

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
CD PlatenseFirpo
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
CD PlatenseFirpo
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
CD PlatenseFirpo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - CD Platense · 1.55 pts / match - Firpo

CD Platense - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing
Firpo - half-time state
36% leading45% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.55
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.82
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.32
CD PlatenseFirpo
50%Clean sheet before half-time64%
CD PlatenseFirpo
59%No goal before half-time45%
CD PlatenseFirpo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)2.45
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)1.41
CD PlatenseFirpo
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
CD PlatenseFirpo
1.45Average goals (2nd half)2.09
CD PlatenseFirpo
55%Clean sheet after half-time50%
CD PlatenseFirpo
50%No goal after half-time14%
CD PlatenseFirpo

CD Platense - second-half results

18% W64% R18% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Firpo - second-half results

77% W14% R9% P
34
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding189%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
9
6
46-60
13
5
61-75
9
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
160%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaFirpo
Average goals in match 2.592.75 3.41
Both teams scored 64%58% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%55% 68%
Clean sheets 23%26% 32%
Goal before half-time 68%69% 64%
Goal after half-time 64%77% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): CD Platense 0 - 1 - 1 Firpo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

CD Platense
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
0 : 0
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs Firpo?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 0:2 Firpo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between CD Platense and Firpo?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches CD Platense won 0, Firpo won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs Firpo?

CD Platense score 1.36 goals per game on average and Firpo 2.23. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 64% of CD Platense's matches and 64% of Firpo's.

What form are CD Platense and Firpo in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Firpo 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs Firpo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CD Platense vs Firpo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.