El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónComplejo Deportivo Tierra de JuegoData current as of 24 September 2026

CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba: match statistics

CD Platense crest
CD Platense
2 : 0half-time 1:0
INCA-Aruba crest
INCA-Aruba

CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Platense played INCA-Aruba in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Venue: Complejo Deportivo Tierra de Juego. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

CD Platense: 0-2-0, 1.00 points/match. INCA-Aruba: 0-0-3, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Platense scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. INCA-Aruba scores 0.33 and concedes 3.00. League average: 2.88 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Platense 100%, INCA-Aruba 33%. Over 2.5: CD Platense 0%, INCA-Aruba 67%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

INCA-Aruba has higher xG: 1.56 vs 0.98. CD Platense: 4.0 shots per match, INCA-Aruba: 10.3.

Match halves

CD Platense: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. INCA-Aruba: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

CD Platense: 0-15 (1 goals). INCA-Aruba: 61-75 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CD Platense remain unbeaten this season, recording 2 draws from 2 matches, while INCA-Aruba have lost all 3 of their games. The visitors have scored just 1 goal and conceded as many as 9, averaging 3 goals against per match, and have failed to earn a single point in their last three outings. Their away form is particularly poor: they have lost 100% of such matches, failed to score in any of them, and average just 39% possession. Platense do have a run of three draws in their last five matches, but their record of 5 goals scored and 4 conceded during that period is clearly more favourable than INCA-Aruba’s 1:9. The hosts should be able to exploit their opponents’ very low scoring efficiency and defensive issues, although Platense’s early-season draws leave a moderate risk of a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is INCA-Aruba’s very poor scoring efficiency: the team has averaged no goals scored this season and failed to score in 100% of its matches so far. The visitors have also scored just 0.33 goals per game in their recent fixtures, with only 1 goal scored during the period analyzed. Platense have yet to keep a clean sheet, but their current defensive form looks clearly better than their season-long record, as they have conceded an average of 0.8 goals across their last five appearances. The hosts should create chances against an opposition defense conceding an average of 3.0 goals in recent matches; however, the visitors’ low goal output provides stronger support for a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have exceeded this line in every match played so far this season. CD Platense have kept no clean sheets and have conceded an average of 3.5 goals, while INCA-Aruba have also failed to keep a clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.0 goals. The underlying numbers point to an open game: average xG stands at 1.36 for the hosts and 1.96 for the visitors, with xG conceded at 2.20 and 1.85, respectively. In their recent matches, INCA-Aruba’s defence allowed opponents to score an average of 3.0 goals, and the team have lost their last three games. The 2.5 line is more balanced due to the visitors’ poor current finishing, as they have scored an average of only 0.33 goals in recent matches; therefore, Over 1.5 goals offers the safer edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a CD Platense win, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, while INCA-Aruba were trailing at half-time in 67% of their recent games. The visitors failed to score before the break in this sample, average only 0.33 goals per match, and have lost all of their last three fixtures. After the interval, Platense look considerably more stable: over their last five matches, they conceded an average of 0.4 goals in the second half, compared with as many as 2.0 for INCA-Aruba. In addition, the hosts have the better current form, averaging 1.2 points per match with only a 20% loss rate in their last five appearances, compared with 0 points and a 100% loss rate for their opponents. However, the visitors’ high xG of 1.96 and Platense’s weak season-long defence, conceding 3.5 goals per match, leave a significant risk of an away turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
14Shots9
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
6Shots on target1
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
2xG1.21
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1Corners2
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
97Dangerous attacks78
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
9Fouls22
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0Cards0
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1Goals conceded / match3
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
49%Average possession40%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1.5Shots on target / match6
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4Shots per match10.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1.5Shots on target6
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
25%Shot conversion3.2%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
49%Possession40%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0.98xG for1.56
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1.36xG against2.08
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

Shooting quality

CD Platense: Efficient finishingINCA-Aruba: Balanced
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
Accuracy (shots on target)38%58%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.670.06

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Platense
DD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%
INCA-Aruba
LLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-3
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-3
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 2.08BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 203% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - CD Platense · 0.33 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

CD Platense is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - CD Platense · 3 goals / match - INCA-Aruba

CD Platense scoring profile: very strong

CD Platense scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

INCA-Aruba scoring profile: strong

INCA-Aruba scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

2Goals scored (season)1
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
2Goals conceded (season)9
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
2Average goals in match3.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
2Goals scored (last 5)1
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
2Goals conceded (last 5)9
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%2 goals0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%2 goals100%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%3 goals67%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%4 goals33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Scored in both halves0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
100%BTTS - last 533%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Platense is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - CD Platense · 0.33 pts / match - INCA-Aruba

CD Platense - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
INCA-Aruba - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)0.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1Goals conceded (1st half)1
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
1.5Average goals (1st half)1
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0%Clean sheet before half-time33%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
50%No goal before half-time100%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)0
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0Goals conceded (2nd half)2
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
0.5Average goals (2nd half)2.33
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba
50%No goal after half-time67%
CD PlatenseINCA-Aruba

CD Platense - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

INCA-Aruba - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Platense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.502.00
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.50.5
1 goal100%50%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
INCA-Aruba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.330.00
Goals scored / match0.00.3
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.02.3
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%100%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%0%
No goal100%67%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

INCA-Aruba
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

INCA-Aruba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
26%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
189%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

CD PlatenseLigaINCA-Aruba
Average goals in match 2.002.88 3.33
Both teams scored 100%59% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%53% 67%
Clean sheets 0%29% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%59% 67%
Goal after half-time 50%71% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished CD Platense 2:0 INCA-Aruba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba?

CD Platense score 1.00 goals per game on average and INCA-Aruba 0.33. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 100% of CD Platense's matches and 33% of INCA-Aruba's.

What form are CD Platense and INCA-Aruba in?

Over the last 5 games CD Platense have a 0-2-0 record (1.00 points per game) and INCA-Aruba 0-0-3 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba?

The statistical background for CD Platense vs INCA-Aruba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.