CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: match statistics
Académica Coimbra is in significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game compared to just 0.8 for CD Trofense. The visitors hold a clear advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.45 goals away, while the hosts only manage 1.18 goals at home. Académica also shows greater accuracy in shooting (4.18 shots on target per away match vs. 2.91 for the hosts) and a better chance conversion rate (16% vs. 14%). CD Trofense struggles with home form, winning only 27% of their home matches and losing as many as 45%, which, given the visitors' current form, puts them at a disadvantage. The goal difference for both teams is identical (+2), but Académica's significantly better form in recent matches (4 wins) favors their victory in this encounter.
CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CD Trofense played Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 22 March 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
CD Trofense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
CD Trofense scores 1.13 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF scores 1.65 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CD Trofense 54%, Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF 52%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 33%, Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF 35%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.17. CD Trofense: 8.0 shots per match, Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: 9.4.
Match halves
CD Trofense: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.50. Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 3: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Académica Coimbra is in significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game compared to just 0.8 for CD Trofense. The visitors hold a clear advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.45 goals away, while the hosts only manage 1.18 goals at home. Académica also shows greater accuracy in shooting (4.18 shots on target per away match vs. 2.91 for the hosts) and a better chance conversion rate (16% vs. 14%). CD Trofense struggles with home form, winning only 27% of their home matches and losing as many as 45%, which, given the visitors' current form, puts them at a disadvantage. The goal difference for both teams is identical (+2), but Académica's significantly better form in recent matches (4 wins) favors their victory in this encounter.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CD Trofense | Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - CD Trofense · 2.4 pts / match - Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.65 goals / match - Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF
CD Trofense scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF scores in 83% of matches (19 of 23 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Trofense
Over / Under - Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CD Trofense is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.39 pts / match - Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CD Trofense
Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| CD Trofense | Liga | Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.04 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 48% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 39% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 32% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 66% | • 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Associação Académica de Coimbra OAFSubstitutionOn: Tiago André Araújo RodriguesOff: Carlos Eduardo Ferreira Batista
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF?
The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 1:2 Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF?
CD Trofense score 1.13 goals per game on average and Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF 1.65. The Liga 3 average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CD Trofense's matches and 52% of Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF's.
What form are CD Trofense and Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF in?
Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF?
The statistical background for CD Trofense vs Associação Académica de Coimbra OAF — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.