Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

CD Trofense vs CD Mafra: match statistics

CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
1 : 1half-time 1:0
CD Mafra crest
CD Mafra
130%(2.60)
X30%(3.00)
240%(2.75)

CD Mafra demonstrates clearly superior form and statistics this season. The visitors hold a record of 10 wins with only 3 losses, while the hosts have won just 7 matches and lost 6. Trofense's form in the last five matches is very poor with merely 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak, whereas Mafra averages 1.6 points per match in their last five outings. Trofense has an alarming 50% loss rate at home and fails to score in 40% of matches at their own stadium. Although Mafra has a negative goal difference away (-2) and only a 30% win rate, their overall quality and form surpass the hosts. Considering all factors, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Mafra's high away draw rate (40%), yet I slightly favor an away victory.

CD Trofense vs CD Mafra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CD Trofense play CD Mafra in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 27 February 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. CD Mafra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. CD Mafra scores 1.41 and concedes 1.34. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CD Trofense 47%, CD Mafra 63%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 31%, CD Mafra 47%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

CD Mafra has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.14. CD Trofense: 7.7 shots per match, CD Mafra: 10.3.

Match halves

CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41. CD Mafra: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). CD Mafra: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

CD Mafra demonstrates clearly superior form and statistics this season. The visitors hold a record of 10 wins with only 3 losses, while the hosts have won just 7 matches and lost 6. Trofense's form in the last five matches is very poor with merely 0.4 points per match and a five-game winless streak, whereas Mafra averages 1.6 points per match in their last five outings. Trofense has an alarming 50% loss rate at home and fails to score in 40% of matches at their own stadium. Although Mafra has a negative goal difference away (-2) and only a 30% win rate, their overall quality and form surpass the hosts. Considering all factors, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Mafra's high away draw rate (40%), yet I slightly favor an away victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
4Shots10
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1Shots on target4
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.77xG1.47
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3Corners6
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
60Dangerous attacks76
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
-1Fouls-1
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
2Cards1
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.94Goals scored / match1.41
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.97Goals conceded / match1.34
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
51%Average possession50%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3.19Shots on target / match4.5
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.72Shots per match10.28
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3.19Shots on target4.5
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
12.1%Shot conversion13.7%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
51%Possession50%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1.14xG for1.41
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1.26xG against1.27
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

Shooting quality

CD Trofense: BalancedCD Mafra: Efficient finishing
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
Accuracy (shots on target)41%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

CD Mafra is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.4 pts / match - CD Mafra

CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-8
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
CD Mafra
LWWDL
Season result split
44% W28% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-9-9
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Mafra is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.41 goals / match - CD Mafra

CD Trofense is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.34 goals / match - CD Mafra

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while CD Mafra keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

CD Mafra scoring profile: very strong

CD Mafra scores in 88% of matches (28 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

30Goals scored (season)45
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
31Goals conceded (season)43
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1.91Average goals in match2.75
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1Goals scored (last 5)8
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal88%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
22%2 goals38%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
6%3 goals13%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
6%4 goals3%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal69%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
19%2 goals34%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3%3 goals22%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0%4 goals9%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time16%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3%BTTS in both halves6%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
16%Scored in both halves28%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
20%BTTS - last 560%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Mafra is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.38 pts / match - CD Mafra

CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing
CD Mafra - half-time state
34% leading34% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)1.38
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.59
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.13
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
56%Clean sheet before half-time59%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
59%No goal before half-time56%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.41
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
0.88Average goals (2nd half)1.63
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
53%Clean sheet after half-time47%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra
69%No goal after half-time28%
CD TrofenseCD Mafra

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Mafra - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
44
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
CD Mafra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

CD Mafra
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
8
7
46-60
7
10
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

CD Mafra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

CD TrofenseLigaCD Mafra
Average goals in match 1.912.23 2.75
Both teams scored 47%49% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%40% 47%
Clean sheets 25%31% 31%
Goal before half-time 66%66% 69%
Goal after half-time 63%74% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CD Trofense 0 - 0 - 1 CD Mafra. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?

The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 1:1 CD Mafra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?

CD Trofense score 0.94 goals per game on average and CD Mafra 1.41. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 47% of CD Trofense's matches and 63% of CD Mafra's.

What form are CD Trofense and CD Mafra in?

Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and CD Mafra 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs CD Mafra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.