CD Trofense vs CF Os Belenenses: match statistics
CD Trofense vs CF Os Belenenses: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CD Trofense played CF Os Belenenses in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
CD Trofense: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. CF Os Belenenses: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
CD Trofense scores 1.12 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. CF Os Belenenses scores 1.68 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CD Trofense 56%, CF Os Belenenses 52%. Over 2.5: CD Trofense 36%, CF Os Belenenses 52%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
CF Os Belenenses has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.16. CD Trofense: 7.9 shots per match, CF Os Belenenses: 11.2.
Match halves
CD Trofense: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.48. CF Os Belenenses: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). CF Os Belenenses: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CF Os Belenenses holds a clear statistical advantage: 16 wins this season versus CD Trofense's 8, and 42 goals scored compared to the hosts' 27. In the last 5 matches the visitors have netted 13 goals and average 2.4 points per game, while Trofense has scored only 4 goals and averages 0.8 points per game. Attack and quality of chances favor the visitors — on average 1.92 goals away, 4.33 shots on target and a 19% conversion rate, versus 1.17 goals, 2.83 shots on target and a 15% conversion for the hosts; additionally the visitors have had 0% of away games without scoring compared to 33% such games for Trofense. Defensively Belenenses also performs better: they concede 1.00 goals on average away and record 42% clean sheets, whereas Trofense concedes 1.08 at home and has 17% clean sheets; visitors' xG is 1.35 versus the hosts' 1.22. Considering the advantage in number of wins, superior xG, higher efficiency and form (4 wins in the last 5 away matches for the visitors vs 1 win for the hosts), I predict an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a strong signal for BTTS - season BTTS rates are 46% for Trofense and 58% for Belenenses versus a league level of 48%, and in the last 5 matches those rates rise to 60% and 80%. Belenenses scores on average 1.92 goals per season and 2.6 in the last five, Trofense has 1.46 seasonally and 0.8 in the same period; simultaneously both teams concede on average 1.0 goals per season and 1.4 goals in the last 5 matches. xG shows the home side generating 1.52 xG versus 1.35 xG for the visitors, and xG against of 1.15 and 1.13, which together with average shots on target 4.38 vs 4.33 indicates opportunities at both ends. Additionally Belenenses have 0% matches without scoring this season and a higher shot conversion rate 19% vs 12% for Trofense, increasing the likelihood they will also find the net; therefore I prefer the Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG for both teams is 1.52 + 1.35 = 2.87, while season goal averages are 1.46 + 1.92 = 3.38, indicating a strong chance of at least 2 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.87 yields P(≥2) ≈ 78% and P(≥3) ≈ 55%, so Over 1.5 has a clear edge over Under. Seasonal metrics support this: Over 1.5 occurred in 69% of Trofense matches and 83% of Belenenses matches, while Over 2.5 occurred in 46% and 58% of fixtures respectively. Additionally, the visitors scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 avg.) versus the hosts' 4 (0.8 avg.), and shot conversion rates are 19% vs 12% with similar on-target shot averages 4.38 vs 4.33, which increases the likelihood of more goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~55%), and Over 3.5 has a low chance (~32%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Key statistics indicate the visitors are likely to lead at the break: CF Os Belenenses led at half-time in 7 matches (58%) versus 6 such instances for the home side (46%). The visitors score on average 1.92 goals per match compared to 1.46 for the hosts, and in the first half they average 1.17 goals versus 0.77 for the home team. They also convert their chances more efficiently — shot conversion 19% vs 12% despite xG 1.35 (visitors) against 1.52 (hosts). Form over the last 5 matches strongly favors the away team: 80% wins in the last 5 for the visitors vs 20% for the hosts, and the visitors led at half-time in 80% of their last 5 games, increasing the likelihood of an early lead. Additionally, the visitors improve results after the break (goal difference in second halves +4 vs +1 for the hosts and 50% second-half wins vs 31%), so the strongest signal is visitors leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CD Trofense | CF Os Belenenses | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
CF Os Belenenses is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - CD Trofense · 2.4 pts / match - CF Os Belenenses
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CF Os Belenenses is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - CD Trofense · 1.68 goals / match - CF Os Belenenses
CD Trofense scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while CF Os Belenenses keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).
CF Os Belenenses scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CD Trofense
Over / Under - CF Os Belenenses
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CF Os Belenenses is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / match - CD Trofense · 1.88 pts / match - CF Os Belenenses
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CD Trofense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
CF Os Belenenses - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CD Trofense
CF Os Belenenses
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| CD Trofense | Liga | CF Os Belenenses | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.08 | 2.23 | ▲ 2.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 39% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 31% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 66% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 74% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CF Os BelenensesSubstitutionOn: Afonso Urtigueira Gouveia Beirão ValenteOff: Afonso Alexandre Cunha Afonso
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CD Trofense 0 - 1 - 0 CF Os Belenenses. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CD Trofense vs CF Os Belenenses?
The Liga 3 match finished CD Trofense 0:1 CF Os Belenenses. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CD Trofense vs CF Os Belenenses?
CD Trofense score 1.12 goals per game on average and CF Os Belenenses 1.68. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 56% of CD Trofense's matches and 52% of CF Os Belenenses's.
What form are CD Trofense and CF Os Belenenses in?
Over the last 5 games CD Trofense have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and CF Os Belenenses 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CD Trofense vs CF Os Belenenses?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


