CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: match statistics
CDS Tampico Madero demonstrates a clear advantage in home matches with an impressive win rate of 77% and a positive goal difference of +12. The hosts score an average of 1.85 goals per home game, while conceding only 0.92 goals, which indicates a solid defense. Correcaminos UAT performs significantly worse on the road, winning only 18% of matches and conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game, with a negative goal difference of -13. The difference in quality of play, offensive and defensive efficiency, and the home advantage clearly point to their victory. Although the visitors have shown improved form in their last five matches, their poor away results and xG statistics (0.96 vs 2.03) provide no grounds for optimism when facing such a strong opponent at home.
CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
CDS Tampico Madero played Correcaminos UAT in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The match was played on 19 March 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
CDS Tampico Madero: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Correcaminos UAT: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
CDS Tampico Madero scores 1.36 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Correcaminos UAT scores 1.09 and concedes 2.09. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: CDS Tampico Madero 54%, Correcaminos UAT 65%. Over 2.5: CDS Tampico Madero 43%, Correcaminos UAT 61%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
CDS Tampico Madero has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.12. CDS Tampico Madero: 12.3 shots per match, Correcaminos UAT: 8.6.
Match halves
CDS Tampico Madero: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.75. Correcaminos UAT: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
CDS Tampico Madero: 16-30 (9 goals). Correcaminos UAT: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ascenso MX: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CDS Tampico Madero demonstrates a clear advantage in home matches with an impressive win rate of 77% and a positive goal difference of +12. The hosts score an average of 1.85 goals per home game, while conceding only 0.92 goals, which indicates a solid defense. Correcaminos UAT performs significantly worse on the road, winning only 18% of matches and conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game, with a negative goal difference of -13. The difference in quality of play, offensive and defensive efficiency, and the home advantage clearly point to their victory. Although the visitors have shown improved form in their last five matches, their poor away results and xG statistics (0.96 vs 2.03) provide no grounds for optimism when facing such a strong opponent at home.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| CDS Tampico Madero | Correcaminos UAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Correcaminos UAT is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.6 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CDS Tampico Madero is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 1.09 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT
CDS Tampico Madero is 109% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 2.09 goals / match - Correcaminos UAT
CDS Tampico Madero scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).
Correcaminos UAT scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while CDS Tampico Madero keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CDS Tampico Madero
Over / Under - Correcaminos UAT
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CDS Tampico Madero is 152% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - CDS Tampico Madero · 0.61 pts / match - Correcaminos UAT
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CDS Tampico Madero - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Correcaminos UAT - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
CDS Tampico Madero
Correcaminos UAT
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).
Teams vs league
| CDS Tampico Madero | Liga | Correcaminos UAT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.36 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 55% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 26% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 74% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CDS Tampico MaderoSubstitutionOn: Francisco Martínez GarcíaOff: Michell Adalberto Rodríguez González
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: CDS Tampico Madero 1 - 0 - 0 Correcaminos UAT. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?
The Ascenso MX match finished CDS Tampico Madero 3:1 Correcaminos UAT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?
CDS Tampico Madero score 1.36 goals per game on average and Correcaminos UAT 1.09. The Ascenso MX average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 54% of CDS Tampico Madero's matches and 65% of Correcaminos UAT's.
What form are CDS Tampico Madero and Correcaminos UAT in?
Over the last 5 games CDS Tampico Madero have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Correcaminos UAT 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CDS Tampico Madero vs Correcaminos UAT: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.