Celje vs Bravo: match statistics
Celje vs Bravo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Celje played Bravo in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Celje: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Bravo: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Celje scores 2.52 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Bravo scores 1.77 and concedes 1.52. League average: 3.12 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Celje 52%, Bravo 61%. Over 2.5: Celje 68%, Bravo 68%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Celje has higher xG: 1.80 vs 1.72. Celje: 14.3 shots per match, Bravo: 13.2.
Match halves
Celje: half-time lead 65%, second-half goals 1.39. Bravo: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
Celje: 76-90+ (18 goals). Bravo: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
PrvaLiga: 3.12 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Celje to win (1) based on their clear home statistical advantage. Celje averages 2.67 goals per home game with xG 2.06, while Bravo scores 1.94 goals away with xG 1.65. The hosts concede only 0.47 goals at home and have 53% clean sheets, whereas Bravo concedes 1.5 goals away and has 19% clean sheets. Celje averages 16.53 shots (6.73 on target) at home with 61% possession and a 16% conversion rate, versus 12.94 shots (4.94 on target), 39% possession and 15% conversion for the visitors; additionally Celje have won 5 of their last 5 matches (13-1 in goals) with 3.0 points per game over the last 5, versus 2.4 points for Bravo. Therefore I assign Celje a 75% chance to win, 15% for a draw and 10% for an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams display high xG values: Celje records attacking xG 1.79, Bravo 1.65, and conceded xG of 1.67 and 1.59, yielding expected λ around 1.66–1.69 for each side. With such λ the probability that each team scores at least once (1−e^(−λ)) is about 81%, which mathematically indicates roughly ~66% chance for BTTS. Seasonal signals support this direction – Celje has BTTS in 53% of matches, Bravo 69% (average 61%), and the league shows 60% BTTS with 3.12 goals per game on average; both teams also have over 2.5 in the 67–69% range. However, Celje’s last 5 matches reduce confidence: only 20% BTTS in the last 5 and a total of 1 goal conceded (0.2 avg) suggest a real possibility of a clean sheet for the home side, while Bravo in the last 5 has 40% BTTS and averages 1.6 goals per game. Balancing signals (strong xG and seasonal tendencies versus Celje’s excellent defensive form) leads me to pick BTTS - Yes with a 62% probability versus 38% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model and defensive metrics indicate a combined expected goals total of approximately 3.35: Celje records an xG of 1.79 while Bravo’s average xG conceded is 1.59 (Celje expected goals ~1.69), whereas Bravo has an xG of 1.65 with Celje conceding an average xG of 1.67 (Bravo expected goals ~1.66). Season-long indicators confirm a propensity for 3+ goal matches — Celje have 67% of games Over 2.5, Bravo 69%, and the league average is 64%. Form and recent numbers reinforce this forecast: Celje scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 avg) and conceded only 1 (0.2), while Bravo scored 8 and conceded 3, yielding a high combined goal output. Additionally, both teams score in 53% of Celje’s matches and 69% of Bravo’s matches; the home side averages 5.93 shots on target vs. 4.94 for the visitors, with conversion rates of 12% and 15%, which increases the likelihood of chances being turned into goals. Therefore the strongest line is Over 2.5 (pick: over) — I estimate ~70% for Over 2.5, very high ~92% for Over 1.5, and moderate ~35% for Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Celje has a clear first-half advantage: the hosts led at the break in 67% of their matches this season and in 100% of their last 5 games, and in their last 5 matches Celje scored an average of 1.8 goals by half-time versus 1.0 for Bravo. Celje’s home xG is 1.79 compared to 1.65 for the visitors, and Celje averages 5.93 shots on target versus 4.94 for Bravo, which increases the hosts’ chances of taking the lead and dominating play. Additionally, the hosts have an average number of points at half-time of 2.07 versus 1.5 for their opponents and have recorded 5 wins (100%) in their last 5 matches, so the 1/1 scenario (lead at the break and home win) is the strongest. Bravo, however, has a seasonal goal average of 1.94 and a higher shot conversion rate of 15% versus Celje’s 12%, which is why I allocated 13% to 1/X and 7% to 1/2 as realistic alternatives. Other scenarios (HT draw or visitors leading) are assessed as less likely, hence the probability distribution favors 1/1 (40%), with a moderate chance of a draw at full-time (X/X 9%) or a full turnaround by the visitors (2/2 12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Celje | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Celje is 15% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Celje · 2.6 pts / match - Bravo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Celje is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
2.52 goals / match - Celje · 1.77 goals / match - Bravo
Celje is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Celje · 1.52 goals / match - Bravo
Celje scores in 90% of matches (28 of 31 matches), while Bravo keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 31 matches).
Bravo scores in 81% of matches (25 of 31 matches), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 45% (14 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Celje
Over / Under - Bravo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Celje is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.06 pts / match - Celje · 1.77 pts / match - Bravo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Celje - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 65% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Bravo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 52%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Celje
Bravo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Celje | Liga | Bravo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.39 | 3.12 | ▲ 3.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 65% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 22% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 94% | 86% | • 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 80% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Celje 1 - 1 - 1 Bravo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Celje vs Bravo?
The PrvaLiga match finished Celje 2:3 Bravo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Celje and Bravo?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Celje won 1, Bravo won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Celje vs Bravo?
Celje score 2.52 goals per game on average and Bravo 1.77. The PrvaLiga average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Celje's matches and 61% of Bravo's.
What form are Celje and Bravo in?
Over the last 5 games Celje have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Bravo 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Celje vs Bravo?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Celje vs Bravo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


