Slovenia - PrvaLigaStadion Z'deželeData current as of 18 October 2026

Celje vs Koper: match statistics

Celje crest
Celje
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Koper crest
Koper

Celje vs Koper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Celje played Koper in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Z'dežele. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Celje: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Koper: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Celje scores 1.67 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Koper scores 1.00 and concedes 0.71. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Celje 67%, Koper 29%. Over 2.5: Celje 50%, Koper 14%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Celje has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.44. Celje: 13.0 shots per match, Koper: 11.6.

Match halves

Celje: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.17. Koper: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Celje: 76-90+ (4 goals). Koper: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Koper sit 2nd, while Celje are fifth, and the visitors have averaged 1.6 points per game over their last five matches compared to 1.4 for the hosts. Koper’s strongest argument is their away defensive record: they concede just 0.6 goals per game, keep a clean sheet in 60% of their appearances, and have an xG against of 1.20. At home, Celje dominate possession (61% versus 56%) and create more chances, registering 11.67 shots per game and an xG of 1.47, yet as many as 67% of their home matches have ended in draws. The hosts are still unbeaten on home soil, but Koper have won 60% of their away matches, meaning home advantage is balanced by the visitors’ superior organisation. Both teams show moderate attacking efficiency, scoring 1.33 and 1.00 goals per game respectively in these conditions, which most strongly supports a draw scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points toward BTTS - No, primarily due to Koper’s extremely tight defense, as they concede just 0.6 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 60% of their games. Koper recorded BTTS in only 20% of their matches this season and in just 20% of their last five appearances, scoring only 0.6 goals per game during that period. Celje does create more chances, with an average xG of 1.95 and 16 shots per match compared with Koper’s 1.23 xG and 9.8 shots, but their conversion rate is only 6%. The hosts conceded in 1.6 of their last five matches, giving Koper a chance to score; however, the visitors themselves average only 2.4 shots on target and may once again fail to find the net. The difference between Celje’s seasonal BTTS rate of 50% and Koper’s 20%, with the league average at 52%, supports a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Koper presents a clearly conservative profile: they concede just 0.6 goals per match this season, keep a clean sheet in 60% of their games, and have not played a single match with more than 2.5 goals. The visitors have scored only 0.6 goals per match in their last five outings, while their games have averaged 1.2 goals, limiting the potential for an open, high-scoring game. Celje create plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.95 and 16 shots per match, but actually score only 1.0 goal, with a shot conversion rate of 6%. Although 60% of the hosts' matches finished Over 2.5 goals in their last five league rounds, Koper's defensive solidity and the visitors' low attacking output point primarily towards Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point, as Celje were level at the break in 80% of their last five matches, compared with 60% for Koper. Koper failed to score before half-time in any of those matches, averaging just 0.4 goals in the first halves of their games, which limits the likelihood of the visitors taking the lead. After the interval, the advantage should shift towards Celje: the hosts average 1.95 xG and 16 shots per match, compared with Koper’s 1.23 xG and 9.8 shots. Celje have scored an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches, while Koper have managed only 0.6, despite the visitors conceding just 0.6 goals per match over the season. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by a home win at the final whistle best combines Koper’s cautious start with Celje’s clearly greater attacking potential.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
CeljeKoper
18Shots11
CeljeKoper
4Shots on target4
CeljeKoper
1.96xG1.24
CeljeKoper
5Corners5
CeljeKoper
78Dangerous attacks38
CeljeKoper
15Fouls16
CeljeKoper
3Cards5
CeljeKoper

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.67Goals scored / match1
CeljeKoper
1.33Goals conceded / match0.71
CeljeKoper
63%Average possession57%
CeljeKoper
4.17Shots on target / match2.86
CeljeKoper

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11.57
CeljeKoper
4.17Shots on target2.86
CeljeKoper
12.8%Shot conversion8.6%
CeljeKoper
63%Possession57%
CeljeKoper
1.67xG for1.44
CeljeKoper
1.37xG against1.31
CeljeKoper

Shooting quality

Celje: BalancedKoper: Balanced
CeljeKoper
Accuracy (shots on target)32%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Celje is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Celje · 1.6 pts / match - Koper

Celje
DWWLW
Season result split
50% W33% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Koper
DLDWW
Season result split
43% W43% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-1
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Celje is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - Celje · 1 goals / match - Koper

Koper is 87% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Celje · 0.71 goals / match - Koper

Celje scoring profile: strong

Celje scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Koper keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 matches).

Koper scoring profile: strong

Koper scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

10Goals scored (season)7
CeljeKoper
8Goals conceded (season)5
CeljeKoper
3Average goals in match1.71
CeljeKoper
8Goals scored (last 5)3
CeljeKoper
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
CeljeKoper

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal71%
CeljeKoper
50%2 goals29%
CeljeKoper
17%3 goals0%
CeljeKoper
0%4 goals0%
CeljeKoper

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal43%
CeljeKoper
33%2 goals29%
CeljeKoper
17%3 goals0%
CeljeKoper
17%4 goals0%
CeljeKoper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
CeljeKoper
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CeljeKoper
17%Scored in both halves14%
CeljeKoper

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
CeljeKoper
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CeljeKoper
60%BTTS - last 520%
CeljeKoper

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
CeljeKoper
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
CeljeKoper
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CeljeKoper

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
CeljeKoper
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
CeljeKoper
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
CeljeKoper

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Celje is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Celje · 0.86 pts / match - Koper

Celje - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Koper - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.86
CeljeKoper
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.14
CeljeKoper
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
CeljeKoper
1.17Average goals (1st half)0.71
CeljeKoper
33%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CeljeKoper
67%No goal before half-time86%
CeljeKoper

After half-time (2nd half)

2.5Points per match (2nd half)2.29
CeljeKoper
1.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
CeljeKoper
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.14
CeljeKoper
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1
CeljeKoper
67%Clean sheet after half-time86%
CeljeKoper
17%No goal after half-time29%
CeljeKoper

Celje - second-half results

83% W0% D17% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding294%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Koper - second-half results

71% W14% D14% L
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding307%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Celje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Koper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Celje
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Koper
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Celje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Koper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

CeljeLigaKoper
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.53▼ 1.71
Both teams scored▲ 67%50%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%42%▼ 14%
Clean sheets▲ 33%30%▲ 57%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%71%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%82%▲ 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CeljeYellow cardMario Kvesić
  2. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Benjamin VerbičOff: Matic Ivanšek
  3. KoperYellow cardGiuseppe Agyemang
  4. KoperYellow cardFilip Bačkulja
  5. KoperSubstitutionOn: Kamil ManseriOff: Bassirou M'Backé N'Diayé
  6. KoperYellow cardBangaly Diawara
  7. KoperSubstitutionOn: Stefano SurdanovicOff: Bangaly Diawara
  8. CeljeYellow cardPijus Sirvys
  9. KoperYellow cardLeo Rimac
  10. CeljeYellow cardVeton Tusha

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Celje 1 - 2 - 1 Koper. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Celje vs Koper?

The PrvaLiga match finished Celje 0:1 Koper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Celje and Koper?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Celje won 1, Koper won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Celje vs Koper?

Celje score 1.67 goals per game on average and Koper 1.00. The PrvaLiga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Celje's matches and 29% of Koper's.

What form are Celje and Koper in?

Over the last 5 games Celje have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Koper 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Celje vs Koper?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Celje vs Koper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.