Slovenia - PrvaLigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Celje vs Mura: match statistics

Celje crest
Celje
5 : 1half-time 2:1
Mura crest
Mura
175%(1.30)
X18%(4.33)
27%(12.33)

Celje are the clear favorites for this match, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 14 wins this season. The hosts show dominant form at home, winning 70% of their home matches with just 0% losses and scoring an average of 2.2 goals per game. Mura are in eighth place with very poor away form - 73% losses, only 9% wins, and just 0.82 goals scored on average away. The difference in expected goals (xG) is clear: Celje have 2.08 xG in home matches, while Mura only have 1.43 xG away, confirming the hosts' qualitative advantage. The recent form of both teams also favors Celje - Mura have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, making a home win a highly likely scenario.

Celje vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Celje played Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Celje: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Mura: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Celje scores 2.52 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Mura scores 1.00 and concedes 1.52. League average: 3.16 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Celje 57%, Mura 43%. Over 2.5: Celje 76%, Mura 48%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Celje has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.41. Celje: 15.2 shots per match, Mura: 10.9.

Match halves

Celje: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.52. Mura: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Celje: 76-90+ (15 goals). Mura: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Celje are the clear favorites for this match, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 14 wins this season. The hosts show dominant form at home, winning 70% of their home matches with just 0% losses and scoring an average of 2.2 goals per game. Mura are in eighth place with very poor away form - 73% losses, only 9% wins, and just 0.82 goals scored on average away. The difference in expected goals (xG) is clear: Celje have 2.08 xG in home matches, while Mura only have 1.43 xG away, confirming the hosts' qualitative advantage. The recent form of both teams also favors Celje - Mura have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, making a home win a highly likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

77Possession (%)23
CeljeMura
19Shots3
CeljeMura
8Shots on target2
CeljeMura
2.51xG0.56
CeljeMura
7Corners1
CeljeMura
104Dangerous attacks31
CeljeMura
6Fouls22
CeljeMura
1Cards7
CeljeMura

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.52Goals scored / match1
CeljeMura
1Goals conceded / match1.52
CeljeMura
62%Average possession48%
CeljeMura
5.9Shots on target / match3.24
CeljeMura

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.24Shots per match10.86
CeljeMura
5.9Shots on target3.24
CeljeMura
16.6%Shot conversion9.2%
CeljeMura
62%Possession48%
CeljeMura
1.88xG for1.41
CeljeMura
1.18xG against1.44
CeljeMura

Shooting quality

Celje: DominantMura: Balanced
CeljeMura
Accuracy (shots on target)39%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Celje is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Celje · 0.6 pts / match - Mura

Celje
DWDWL
Season result split
67% W24% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-2
2.24 pts / match · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Mura
LLLWL
Season result split
19% W29% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-11
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Celje is 152% better for: goals scored per match.

2.52 goals / match - Celje · 1 goals / match - Mura

Celje is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Celje · 1.52 goals / match - Mura

Celje scoring profile: very strong

Celje scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

Mura scoring profile: mixed

Mura scores in 52% of matches (11 of 21 matches), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

53Goals scored (season)21
CeljeMura
21Goals conceded (season)32
CeljeMura
3.52Average goals in match2.52
CeljeMura
12Goals scored (last 5)3
CeljeMura
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
CeljeMura

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal52%
CeljeMura
76%2 goals33%
CeljeMura
57%3 goals14%
CeljeMura
19%4 goals0%
CeljeMura

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal86%
CeljeMura
29%2 goals48%
CeljeMura
14%3 goals19%
CeljeMura
0%4 goals0%
CeljeMura

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time24%
CeljeMura
0%BTTS in both halves10%
CeljeMura
52%Scored in both halves24%
CeljeMura

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
CeljeMura
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CeljeMura
100%BTTS - last 520%
CeljeMura

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
CeljeMura
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
CeljeMura
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
CeljeMura

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
CeljeMura
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
CeljeMura
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
CeljeMura

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Celje is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.76 pts / match - Celje · 1 pts / match - Mura

Celje - half-time state
52% leading19% draw29% trailing
Mura - half-time state
24% leading29% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.76Points per match (1st half)1
CeljeMura
1Goals scored (1st half)0.48
CeljeMura
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
CeljeMura
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.29
CeljeMura
52%Clean sheet before half-time29%
CeljeMura
38%No goal before half-time67%
CeljeMura

After half-time (2nd half)

2.38Points per match (2nd half)0.95
CeljeMura
1.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
CeljeMura
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
CeljeMura
1.95Average goals (2nd half)1.24
CeljeMura
67%Clean sheet after half-time48%
CeljeMura
19%No goal after half-time57%
CeljeMura

Celje - second-half results

71% W24% R5% P
37
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+23
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mura - second-half results

14% W52% R33% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Celje - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Celje
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
10
3
16-30
5
7
31-45
7
1
46-60
10
5
61-75
15
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.

Mura
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
2
6
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Celje

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Mura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

CeljeLigaMura
Average goals in match 3.523.16 2.52
Both teams scored 57%62% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%65% 48%
Clean sheets 43%21% 14%
Goal before half-time 90%85% 81%
Goal after half-time 86%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.16
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.46
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Žan Luk LebanOff: Luka Kolar
  2. CeljeGoalMario KvesićAssist: Milot Avdyli
  3. MuraYellow cardHamza Ljukovac
  4. CeljeYellow cardMario Kvesić
  5. MuraYellow cardHamza Ljukovac
  6. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Artemijus TutyškinasOff: Gašper Vodeb
  7. MuraYellow cardNino Kouter
  8. CeljeSubstitutionOn: Nikita IosifovOff: Milot Avdyli
  9. MuraYellow cardFaad Sana
  10. CeljeGoalSvit Sešlar
  11. MuraSubstitutionOn: Jan KovačičOff: Nino Kouter
  12. MuraRed cardNejc Ajhmajer

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Celje 1 - 0 - 1 Mura. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NŠ Mura
2 : 1
NK Celje
NK Celje
3 : 0
NŠ Mura

FAQ

What was the result of Celje vs Mura?

The PrvaLiga match finished Celje 5:1 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Celje and Mura?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Celje won 1, Mura won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Celje vs Mura?

Celje score 2.52 goals per game on average and Mura 1.00. The PrvaLiga average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Celje's matches and 43% of Mura's.

What form are Celje and Mura in?

Over the last 5 games Celje have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mura 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Celje vs Mura?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.