Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC: match statistics
Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Central Coast Mariners played Melbourne City FC in A-League (Australia). The match was played on 29 November 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Central Coast Mariners: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Melbourne City FC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Central Coast Mariners scores 1.40 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Melbourne City FC scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.66 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Central Coast Mariners 60%, Melbourne City FC 40%. Over 2.5: Central Coast Mariners 40%, Melbourne City FC 40%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Melbourne City FC has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.13. Central Coast Mariners: 10.4 shots per match, Melbourne City FC: 11.0.
Match halves
Central Coast Mariners: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Melbourne City FC: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Central Coast Mariners: 16-30 (2 goals). Melbourne City FC: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
A-League: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Central Coast Mariners | Melbourne City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Melbourne City FC is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Central Coast Mariners · 1.6 pts / match - Melbourne City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Melbourne City FC is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Central Coast Mariners · 1.6 goals / match - Melbourne City FC
Melbourne City FC is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Central Coast Mariners · 1 goals / match - Melbourne City FC
Central Coast Mariners scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Melbourne City FC keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
Melbourne City FC scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Central Coast Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Central Coast Mariners
Over / Under - Melbourne City FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Melbourne City FC is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Central Coast Mariners · 1.6 pts / match - Melbourne City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Central Coast Mariners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Melbourne City FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Central Coast Mariners
Melbourne City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A-League).
Teams vs league
| Central Coast Mariners | Liga | Melbourne City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.66 | • 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 53% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 72% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC?
The A-League match finished Central Coast Mariners 0:0 Melbourne City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC?
Central Coast Mariners score 1.40 goals per game on average and Melbourne City FC 1.60. The A-League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Central Coast Mariners's matches and 40% of Melbourne City FC's.
What form are Central Coast Mariners and Melbourne City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Central Coast Mariners have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Melbourne City FC 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Central Coast Mariners vs Melbourne City FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.