Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad: match statistics
As league leaders, Ceramica Cleopatra presents impressive home form with 83% wins at home and only 17% losses. The hosts average 1.5 goals scored per home match while conceding just 0.5, translating to a goal difference of +6 and a remarkable 67% clean sheets. Al Ittihad, sitting at the bottom of the table, has very poor away results—only 17% wins and 67% losses, averaging just 0.67 goals scored per away match. Additionally, the visitors have a low shot conversion rate (7%) and lower xG (0.99) compared to the hosts (1.27), confirming their offensive struggles. Although Al Ittihad's recent form has slightly improved (1.4 PPG in the last 5 matches), facing the leader on their turf seems too great a challenge, making a victory for Ceramica Cleopatra the most probable scenario.
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ceramica Cleopatra played Al Ittihad in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 21 January 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Ceramica Cleopatra: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Al Ittihad: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.38 goals per match. Al Ittihad scores 0.62 and concedes 1.46. League average: 1.90 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 15%, Al Ittihad 46%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 15%, Al Ittihad 54%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.16 vs 1.12. Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.3 shots per match, Al Ittihad: 9.4.
Match halves
Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.00. Al Ittihad: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Ceramica Cleopatra: 61-75 (5 goals). Al Ittihad: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.90 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
As league leaders, Ceramica Cleopatra presents impressive home form with 83% wins at home and only 17% losses. The hosts average 1.5 goals scored per home match while conceding just 0.5, translating to a goal difference of +6 and a remarkable 67% clean sheets. Al Ittihad, sitting at the bottom of the table, has very poor away results—only 17% wins and 67% losses, averaging just 0.67 goals scored per away match. Additionally, the visitors have a low shot conversion rate (7%) and lower xG (0.99) compared to the hosts (1.27), confirming their offensive struggles. Although Al Ittihad's recent form has slightly improved (1.4 PPG in the last 5 matches), facing the leader on their turf seems too great a challenge, making a victory for Ceramica Cleopatra the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Al Ittihad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 400% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.6 pts / match - Al Ittihad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 111% better for: goals scored per match.
1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.62 goals / match - Al Ittihad
Ceramica Cleopatra is 284% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.38 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.46 goals / match - Al Ittihad
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Al Ittihad scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 69% (9 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Al Ittihad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 143% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.54 pts / match - Al Ittihad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Ittihad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Al Ittihad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Al Ittihad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.69 | 1.90 | ▲ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 15% | 43% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 33% | ▲ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 38% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 38% | 54% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 3:1 Al Ittihad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.31 goals per game on average and Al Ittihad 0.62. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 15% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 46% of Al Ittihad's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Al Ittihad in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Al Ittihad 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Al Ittihad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.