Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ceramica Cleopatra play Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 2 September 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium.
Current form
Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Coca-Cola: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Coca-Cola scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.35 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 100%, Coca-Cola 50%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 100%, Coca-Cola 0%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 40%.
xG, shots and style
Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.48. Ceramica Cleopatra: 14.0 shots per match, Coca-Cola: 15.0.
Match halves
Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00. Coca-Cola: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Ceramica Cleopatra: 0-15 (1 goals). Coca-Cola: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.35 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 40%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Coca-Cola is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 2 pts / match - Coca-Cola
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.5 goals / match - Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.5 goals / match - Coca-Cola
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
Coca-Cola scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Coca-Cola
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
3 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / match - Coca-Cola
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Coca-Cola - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Coca-Cola
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 2.35 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 35% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 1 - 0 - 0 Coca-Cola. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
When do Ceramica Cleopatra and Coca-Cola play?
Ceramica Cleopatra face Coca-Cola on 2 September 2026 in Egyptian Premier League at Cairo International Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 2.00 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 1.50. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 50% of Coca-Cola's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Coca-Cola in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Coca-Cola — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.