Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra occupies first place in the table and displays impressive home form with 86% of home matches won, scoring an average of 1.71 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Ghazl El Mehalla is a typical away-draw team (63% draws), failing to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%) and holding just a 13% away win rate. The difference in possession (61% vs 45%) and shot quality (4.29 vs 2.13 on target per match) decisively favors the hosts. Despite Ceramica's weaker recent form in the league overall, their dominance in home matches and the guests' offensive helplessness on the road indicate a probable victory for the hosts.
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ceramica Cleopatra played Ghazl El Mehalla in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 5 February 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Ceramica Cleopatra: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Ghazl El Mehalla: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.47 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Ghazl El Mehalla scores 0.60 and concedes 0.47. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 27%, Ghazl El Mehalla 27%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 27%, Ghazl El Mehalla 20%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.
xG, shots and style
Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.19 vs 1.03. Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.4 shots per match, Ghazl El Mehalla: 8.9.
Match halves
Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00. Ghazl El Mehalla: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (6 goals). Ghazl El Mehalla: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra occupies first place in the table and displays impressive home form with 86% of home matches won, scoring an average of 1.71 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Ghazl El Mehalla is a typical away-draw team (63% draws), failing to score in half of their away matches (FTS% 50%) and holding just a 13% away win rate. The difference in possession (61% vs 45%) and shot quality (4.29 vs 2.13 on target per match) decisively favors the hosts. Despite Ceramica's weaker recent form in the league overall, their dominance in home matches and the guests' offensive helplessness on the road indicate a probable victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Ghazl El Mehalla | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.2 pts / match - Ghazl El Mehalla
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 145% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.6 goals / match - Ghazl El Mehalla
Ghazl El Mehalla is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.6 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 0.47 goals / match - Ghazl El Mehalla
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Ghazl El Mehalla keeps a clean sheet in 73% (11 of 15 matches).
Ghazl El Mehalla scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - Ghazl El Mehalla
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 pts / match - Ghazl El Mehalla
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ghazl El Mehalla - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
Ghazl El Mehalla
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | Ghazl El Mehalla | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.07 | 2.02 | ▼ 1.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 46% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 35% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 36% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 58% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 68% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 3:2 Ghazl El Mehalla. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 1.47 goals per game on average and Ghazl El Mehalla 0.60. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 27% of Ghazl El Mehalla's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and Ghazl El Mehalla in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Ghazl El Mehalla 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
The statistical background for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.