Ceramica Cleopatra vs National Bank of Egypt: match statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra vs National Bank of Egypt: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ceramica Cleopatra played National Bank of Egypt in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Ceramica Cleopatra: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match. National Bank of Egypt: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. National Bank of Egypt scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ceramica Cleopatra 50%, National Bank of Egypt 25%. Over 2.5: Ceramica Cleopatra 50%, National Bank of Egypt 50%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
National Bank of Egypt has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.49. Ceramica Cleopatra: 12.0 shots per match, National Bank of Egypt: 20.0.
Match halves
Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.25. National Bank of Egypt: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Ceramica Cleopatra: 0-15 (2 goals). National Bank of Egypt: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra sit 4th, while National Bank of Egypt are 10th, and the hosts have won 3 of their 4 league matches so far, with a goal difference of 8:3. In their last five matches, Ceramica have scored 8 goals and won three games, while the visitors have conceded 7 goals during this period. At home, the hosts average 1.5 goals per match and have failed to score on no occasion, contrasting with the visitors, who score just 0.5 goals away from home and have been held scoreless in 50% of their matches. National Bank do create plenty of chances, recording an average xG of 2.27 and 21.5 shots per match, but convert just 2% of their attempts. Therefore, Ceramica’s edge in finishing efficiency and current form should prove decisive.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “No” selection holds a slight edge, as National Bank of Egypt kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while this team’s seasonal BTTS rate stands at just 0%. The visitors conceded only 0.5 goals per match on average, with an xG against them of 1.02, whereas Ceramica Cleopatra, despite scoring an average of 1.5 goals, have failed to keep a single clean sheet. National Bank nevertheless generate a high 2.27 xG and 6.5 shots on target per match, but convert this into just 0.5 goals with a very low 2% conversion rate, increasing the risk that they will fail to capitalize on their chances. The last five matches for both teams produced BTTS in 40% of cases, identical to the league average of 40%, so the data does not point to a clearly goal-heavy match involving both sides. The most likely scenario is that at least one team will fail to score, primarily due to the visitors’ more solid defence and their poor seasonal finishing.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Ceramika’s last five matches produced an average of 2.4 goals, while National Bank’s matches averaged 2.6, indicating moderate scoring potential rather than a consistent trend toward very high-scoring games. During this period, the hosts conceded only 0.8 goals per match, while the visitors scored 1.2, which limits the projection for their attacking output. National Bank does generate a high xG of 2.11 and averages 6.5 shots on target, but converts just 2% of its attempts, meaning its quality of play does not fully translate into goals. The Under 3.5 line is also supported by the fact that the visitors have yet to record a match with at least four goals, while the league average is only 2.05 goals. The estimated 2.40 goals in the match clearly supports selecting Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ceramica Cleopatra led at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, while National Bank of Egypt were level after 45 minutes in 3 of 5 games and led only once. During this run, the hosts conceded just 0.2 goals per match before the break, while their opponents conceded 0.6, supporting the scenario of a Ceramica advantage already in the first half. Across their last five appearances, Ceramica won 60% of their matches and averaged 1.6 goals scored against 0.8 conceded, whereas National Bank of Egypt conceded 1.4 goals per game. After the break, the hosts score an average of 1.0 goal, while the visitors allow opponents 0.8, giving the home side a solid foundation to maintain or extend their lead. Although the visitors’ xG stands at 2.27 compared with Ceramica’s 1.80, their shot conversion rate is only 2%, versus 8% for the hosts; therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ceramica Cleopatra | National Bank of Egypt | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.25 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.5 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt
Ceramica Cleopatra is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.75 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.25 goals / match - National Bank of Egypt
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while National Bank of Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
National Bank of Egypt scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
Over / Under - National Bank of Egypt
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra · 1.5 pts / match - National Bank of Egypt
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
National Bank of Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.50 | 2.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ceramica Cleopatra
National Bank of Egypt
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ceramica Cleopatra | Liga | National Bank of Egypt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.02 | ▲ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 32% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 37% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 49% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ceramica Cleopatra 0 - 1 - 0 National Bank of Egypt. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ceramica Cleopatra vs National Bank of Egypt?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Ceramica Cleopatra 2:0 National Bank of Egypt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ceramica Cleopatra vs National Bank of Egypt?
Ceramica Cleopatra score 2.00 goals per game on average and National Bank of Egypt 1.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ceramica Cleopatra's matches and 25% of National Bank of Egypt's.
What form are Ceramica Cleopatra and National Bank of Egypt in?
Over the last 5 games Ceramica Cleopatra have a 3-0-1 record (2.25 points per game) and National Bank of Egypt 2-0-2 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ceramica Cleopatra vs National Bank of Egypt?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


