Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH: match statistics

Cercle Brugge crest
Cercle Brugge
0 : 0half-time 0:0
FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
150%(1.73)
X30%(3.93)
220%(4.66)

Cercle Brugge is in better form over their last five matches with a record of 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per match, while FCV Dender EH has not won any of their last five matches and averages only 0.2 points per match. The hosts boast a higher average expected goals (xG 1.58) in home matches than the visitors away (xG 1.29), indicating their greater efficiency in creating scoring opportunities. Cercle Brugge scores an average of 1.38 goals per home match, surpassing the 0.92 goals averaged by Dender in away matches. Although the hosts are on a poor home run with only an 8% win rate, their overall form and offensive statistics give them a genuine chance to break through. Considering both teams' defensive issues and Cercle Brugge's slightly better parameters, a home win is predicted, although a draw is also likely due to both sides' high draw rates.

Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cercle Brugge played FCV Dender EH in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 1 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Cercle Brugge: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. FCV Dender EH: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cercle Brugge scores 1.31 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. FCV Dender EH scores 0.81 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cercle Brugge 62%, FCV Dender EH 58%. Over 2.5: Cercle Brugge 46%, FCV Dender EH 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Cercle Brugge has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.27. Cercle Brugge: 13.4 shots per match, FCV Dender EH: 10.8.

Match halves

Cercle Brugge: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.50. FCV Dender EH: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

Cercle Brugge: 31-45+ (13 goals). FCV Dender EH: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Pro League: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cercle Brugge is in better form over their last five matches with a record of 2 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per match, while FCV Dender EH has not won any of their last five matches and averages only 0.2 points per match. The hosts boast a higher average expected goals (xG 1.58) in home matches than the visitors away (xG 1.29), indicating their greater efficiency in creating scoring opportunities. Cercle Brugge scores an average of 1.38 goals per home match, surpassing the 0.92 goals averaged by Dender in away matches. Although the hosts are on a poor home run with only an 8% win rate, their overall form and offensive statistics give them a genuine chance to break through. Considering both teams' defensive issues and Cercle Brugge's slightly better parameters, a home win is predicted, although a draw is also likely due to both sides' high draw rates.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
22Shots11
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8Shots on target6
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
2.41xG1.39
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
9Corners4
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
64Dangerous attacks38
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
10Fouls10
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1Cards2
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.31Goals scored / match0.81
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.54Goals conceded / match1.69
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
47%Average possession47%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
4.15Shots on target / match3.85
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match10.81
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
4.15Shots on target3.85
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
9.8%Shot conversion7.5%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
47%Possession47%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.5xG for1.27
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.58xG against1.67
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Shooting quality

Cercle Brugge: BalancedFCV Dender EH: Balanced
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cercle Brugge is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Cercle Brugge · 0.2 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge
DLWLW
Season result split
23% W35% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-11
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FCV Dender EH
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
12% W31% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-15
0.65 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cercle Brugge is 62% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Cercle Brugge · 0.81 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.54 goals / match - Cercle Brugge · 1.69 goals / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Cercle Brugge scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Cercle Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

34Goals scored (season)21
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
40Goals conceded (season)44
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
2.85Average goals in match2.5
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
7Goals scored (last 5)4
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal62%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
35%2 goals19%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
12%3 goals0%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%4 goals0%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal85%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
50%2 goals50%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
19%3 goals23%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%4 goals8%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time19%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
12%Scored in both halves15%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
60%BTTS - last 560%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cercle Brugge is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Cercle Brugge · 0.92 pts / match - FCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge - half-time state
27% leading35% draw38% trailing
FCV Dender EH - half-time state
15% leading46% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)0.92
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.81Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.62Average goals (1st half)1
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
38%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
54%No goal before half-time65%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)0.85
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)1.04
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
1.23Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
50%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH
58%No goal after half-time58%
Cercle BruggeFCV Dender EH

Cercle Brugge - second-half results

23% W46% D31% L
30
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 23%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

19% W27% D54% L
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cercle Brugge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FCV Dender EH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cercle Brugge
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
4
8
16-30
13
10
31-45
3
10
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
1
5
16-30
2
5
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
10
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cercle Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Cercle BruggeLigaFCV Dender EH
Average goals in match 2.852.61 2.50
Both teams scored 62%54% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%47% 50%
Clean sheets 23%27% 15%
Goal before half-time 85%73% 65%
Goal after half-time 65%73% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHYellow cardFabio Ferraro
  2. FCV Dender EHYellow cardDavid Toshevski
  3. Cercle BruggeYellow cardOumar Diakitu00e9
  4. Cercle BruggeSubstitutionOn: Charles HerrmannOff: Makaya Ibrahima Diaby
  5. Cercle BruggeSubstitutionOn: Oluwaseun AdewumiOff: Oumar Diakitu00e9
  6. Cercle BruggeSubstitutionOn: Steve NgouraOff: Charles Herrmann
  7. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Mohamed BerteOff: Roman Květ
  8. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Krzysztof KotonOff: David Toshevski

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Nathan VerboomenMatches officiated: 21
4.1Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 252%Home wins28%Draws19%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Cercle Brugge 0 - 1 - 0 FCV Dender EH. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
0 : 0
Cercle Brugge KSV

FAQ

What was the result of Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

The Pro League match finished Cercle Brugge 0:0 FCV Dender EH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

Cercle Brugge score 1.31 goals per game on average and FCV Dender EH 0.81. The Pro League average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Cercle Brugge's matches and 58% of FCV Dender EH's.

What form are Cercle Brugge and FCV Dender EH in?

Over the last 5 games Cercle Brugge have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FCV Dender EH 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH?

The statistical background for Cercle Brugge vs FCV Dender EH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.