Japan - J1 LeagueKINCHO StadiumData current as of 15 October 2026

Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos: match statistics

Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Cerezo Osaka played Yokohama F. Marinos in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: KINCHO Stadium. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Cerezo Osaka: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Yokohama F. Marinos: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Cerezo Osaka scores 0.88 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Yokohama F. Marinos scores 1.63 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Cerezo Osaka 38%, Yokohama F. Marinos 50%. Over 2.5: Cerezo Osaka 38%, Yokohama F. Marinos 25%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Cerezo Osaka has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.29. Cerezo Osaka: 11.6 shots per match, Yokohama F. Marinos: 11.5.

Match halves

Cerezo Osaka: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Yokohama F. Marinos: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Cerezo Osaka: 16-30 (3 goals). Yokohama F. Marinos: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cerezo Osaka are unbeaten at home, winning 3 of their 4 matches and conceding just 0.25 goals per game on average, giving them a slight edge heading into this match. However, Yokohama F. Marinos have been in better form over their last five league games, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while the hosts have won twice, drawn twice and lost once. The visitors average 1.5 goals away from home compared with Cerezo’s 1.25 at home, and also hit the target more often: 4 times per match to the hosts’ 3.5. The quality of chances created is similar, with Cerezo’s home xG at 1.39 and Yokohama’s away xG at 1.34; the hosts could also take advantage of the fact that the visitors allow chances worth an average xG of 1.52 on the road. Cerezo’s strong defensive record at home points towards a “1” pick, although Yokohama’s good run means a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 50% of their matches in the analyzed split, with the rate rising to 60% for each over their last five games. Cerezo average 1.75 goals at home, while Yokohama average 1.5 away, which points to a chance of both sides finding the net. Over their last five matches, their average attacking xG was similar, at 1.48 and 1.51 respectively, indicating that both teams regularly create scoring opportunities. However, caution is warranted: each has kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, and Yokohama have conceded just 0.6 goals per game recently. Therefore, BTTS - Yes has a slight edge, but it is not a strong signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: both teams finished below this line in 75% of their matches, and the projected total is 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Cerezo averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Yokohama averaged 1.6 scored and conceded just 0.6. Although both teams scored in 100% of the season matches included in the analysis, Over 2.5 goals landed in only 25% of matches for each side. Average attacking xG stands at 1.24 for Cerezo and 1.34 for Yokohama, supporting a scenario in which both teams score without producing a high-scoring game. Therefore, the 3.5 line offers a clearer edge than lower goal totals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Yokohama held a lead at the break four times and did not concede in the first half, while Cerezo led twice and conceded an average of 0.8 goals before half-time. Over this period, the visitors averaged 2.2 points per match compared with the hosts’ 1.6, and conceded just 0.6 goals per match against Cerezo’s 1.6. This points to a scenario in which Yokohama take the lead and hold on to it until the final whistle. However, the HT/FT pick is not clear-cut: Cerezo led at the break in three of their four home matches, and both teams averaged 1.75 points per match in these fixtures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
10Shots13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
2Shots on target2
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.16xG1.32
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
5Corners4
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
53Dangerous attacks50
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
11Fouls13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
4Cards1
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.88Goals scored / match1.63
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.5Goals conceded / match1.13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
57%Average possession49%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
3.38Shots on target / match3.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.63Shots per match11.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
3.38Shots on target3.5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
7.5%Shot conversion14.1%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
57%Possession49%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.33xG for1.29
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.51xG against1.42
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Shooting quality

Cerezo Osaka: BalancedYokohama F. Marinos: Efficient finishing
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
Accuracy (shots on target)29%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Cerezo Osaka · 1.6 pts / match - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka
LWDLD
Season result split
38% W25% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Yokohama F. Marinos
LDWDW
Season result split
50% W25% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-2
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 85% better for: goals scored per match.

0.88 goals / match - Cerezo Osaka · 1.63 goals / match - Yokohama F. Marinos

Yokohama F. Marinos is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Cerezo Osaka · 1.13 goals / match - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka scoring profile: mixed

Cerezo Osaka scores in 63% of matches (5 of 8 matches), while Yokohama F. Marinos keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

Yokohama F. Marinos scoring profile: very strong

Yokohama F. Marinos scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Cerezo Osaka keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).

7Goals scored (season)13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
12Goals conceded (season)9
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
2.38Average goals in match2.75
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal100%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%2 goals50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%3 goals13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%4 goals0%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%2 goals25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%3 goals25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%4 goals13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Yokohama F. Marinos - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.4 of 8 matches
60%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0%BTTS in both halves25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Scored in both halves50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
40%BTTS - last 560%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Yokohama F. Marinos is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Cerezo Osaka · 2.25 pts / match - Yokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Yokohama F. Marinos - half-time state
63% leading38% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)2.25
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.88
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.13
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
75%No goal before half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.63
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
63%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos
50%No goal after half-time25%
Cerezo OsakaYokohama F. Marinos

Cerezo Osaka - second-half results

38% W25% D38% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yokohama F. Marinos - second-half results

38% W25% D38% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cerezo Osaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Yokohama F. Marinos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Cerezo Osaka
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Yokohama F. Marinos
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Cerezo Osaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Yokohama F. Marinos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Cerezo OsakaLigaYokohama F. Marinos
Average goals in match▼ 2.382.99▼ 2.75
Both teams scored▼ 38%60%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 38%54%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▲ 38%22%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 63%71%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 75%88%• 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardJavier Hernández Cabrera
  2. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardAyumu Ohata
  3. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardJackson Irvine
  4. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Travis TakahashiOff: Javier Hernández Cabrera
  5. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Yota KomiOff: Lucas Fernandes
  6. Yokohama F. MarinosYellow cardTakuto Kimura
  7. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Kosei OkazawaOff: Yumeki Yokoyama
  8. Cerezo OsakaSubstitutionOn: Shinji KagawaOff: Pablo David Sabbag Daccarett
  9. Yokohama F. MarinosSubstitutionOn: Kei ChinenOff: Kosuke Matsumura
  10. Cerezo OsakaYellow cardShinji Kagawa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Cerezo Osaka 1 - 0 - 1 Yokohama F. Marinos. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Yokohama F. Marinos
3 : 1
Cerezo Osaka
Cerezo Osaka
1 : 0
Yokohama F. Marinos

FAQ

What was the result of Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

The J1 League match finished Cerezo Osaka 0:0 Yokohama F. Marinos. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cerezo Osaka and Yokohama F. Marinos?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Cerezo Osaka won 1, Yokohama F. Marinos won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

Cerezo Osaka score 0.88 goals per game on average and Yokohama F. Marinos 1.63. The J1 League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Cerezo Osaka's matches and 50% of Yokohama F. Marinos's.

What form are Cerezo Osaka and Yokohama F. Marinos in?

Over the last 5 games Cerezo Osaka have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Yokohama F. Marinos 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.